| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
55
   |
Posted - 2012.02.09 10:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Cool, cool. It's kind of water under the bridge who came up with it, right? Cat's out of the bag now.
I think the more important question is, what sort of mechanics do you have in mind that would work well for both Faction Warfare and null sec sovereignty?
If you've got some good ideas, I can be convinced to get my people on board. We should definitely be talking specifics here though, I don't want my supporters getting all riled up about "null sec mechanics in FW" if there really isn't anything to get all doomsday about.
If you can explain to the Faction Warfare community what options you endorse that might be tested, maybe we can deflate the whole argument before it gets too out of control.
It might be a cat out of a bag for your people, but my people are happier with CCP not implementing ~grand ideas~ on null without testing them elsewhere first. One man's scandal is another's good sense.
Faction Warfare, The Official Guinea Pigs of New Eden. |
Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
55
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 10:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Vordak Kallager wrote:
Faction Warfare, The Official Guinea Pigs of New Eden.
You guys could use some medical product testing, it beats being neglected since 2008.
As long as it makes my winter coat lustrous and shiny. |
Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
55
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 11:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Imryn Xaran wrote:The Mittani wrote:Imryn Xaran wrote:
I want clarification on this contradictory position.
you don't deserve one, sorry publord Really? You are happy that anyone reading this thread will know that you appear to be a two faced liar? What, exactly, has he lied about? He's publicly stated that it's not cool for Goons to report other Goons and if he told some pubbies to report each other...what difference does it make? Are you expecting him to care a great deal about what the pubbies do with the bot reporting system? If you want to accuse him of being some sort of RMT overlord then just man up and say it. The way you're currently going about it is embarrassing.
I, FOR ONE, WELCOME OUR HAS-ALWAYS-BEEN-HERE RMT OVERLORD. 
Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7 |
Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
61
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 04:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
JamesCLK wrote:Cearain wrote:
:words::words::words::words::words::words: and more :words:
Mittens prefering to test 0.0 sov mechanics on FW, and Mittens (as the chairman) trying to push the CSM to advocate 0.0 sov mechanics to be tested on FW, are two entirely different arguments. His stance is from my understanding the former of the two. Put the Drama Llama away? 
If you test 0.0 mechanics on FW and Lowsec, you are going to get very different results and feedback than if you test them on the player base they are designed for.
FW/Lowsec inhabitants and 0.0 inhabitants differ greatly in their expectations of the game and why they play the game. Something that might work in 0.0 might not work in FW and vice versa. Therefore, it is a waste of time to try to use one player base as a "test-bed" for the other.
To use an extremely straightforward analogy that you might be able to more clearly understand:
CCP gives their Dog a bath. The Dog loves it. Dogs and Cats are both animals. Therefore, CCP is going to give it's Cat that same bath. You can guess how that will turn out.
Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7 |
Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
61
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 05:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Thanks Jinli mei for doing the hard work of finding the official stance on the botting issue. I wanted to know, but was too lazy to do it myself.
I suppose the botting is a Two Final Solution. Either you hate bots so much you leave your alliance, or you love your allaince so much you stay and ignore the botting. Makes sense to me. Not much else you can do I suppose.
Also with the low sec test bed. When I read it, it seemed a way to add features to low sec, so its more fun and enjoyable and has things going for it. I never felt it would restrict low sec the way players feel about it. I actaully liked hearing about the test bed and it is a bit surprising the players reactions to it.
So far, those "features" have been potential new 0.0 Sov Mechanics. We don't want "nullsec lite" in lowsec. There will be a lot of unsubs if we have to start doing 0.0 Sov war bullshit over in lowsec. Lowsec is about casual/instant pvp, not about long form ups/waits and alarm-clock ops.
Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7 |
Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous
Late Night Alliance
61
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 06:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:yeah that's why nullsec voters came out in droves to vote in representatives
because they're really happy with the current sov war mechanics as is
so happy that clearly they want to make lowsec a copy of the current model
I don't think you understand what my point is, but thanks for the sarcasm anyway.
Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7 |
| |
|