| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Leyla Constantine
University of Caille Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 19:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
Well we all know how irritating it is sometimes not being able to understand which system the FC is ordering the fleet to warp to so I propose that we change the system names to something which is easier to pronounce for the sake of efficiency in the game.
I understand that some of the planets and systems were named after beta testers and I really appreciate their work and would like to take this opportunity to thank them on behalf of entire New Eden. But the reason they beta tested was to make EVE Online better and the way it can be made even more better is to simply change the planet and system names. That is what they would have wanted and that is the best way to honor their memory. |

Baaldor
Black Sail Anarchists
36
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 19:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
FC : Set Destination to linked System in fleet chat.
FC: Everyone warp to Hof (Hofjaldgund) Gate
Not too hard to work around it. |

Drake Draconis
Shadow Cadre Shadow Confederation
87
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 19:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
Baaldor wrote:FC : Set Destination to linked System in fleet chat.
FC: Everyone warp to Hof (Hofjaldgund) Gate
Not too hard to work around it.
Or
FC: Everyone warp to Hotel-Oscar-Foxtrot
Not that hard. |

Baaldor
Black Sail Anarchists
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 19:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Drake Draconis wrote:Baaldor wrote:FC : Set Destination to linked System in fleet chat.
FC: Everyone warp to Hof (Hofjaldgund) Gate
Not too hard to work around it. Or FC: Everyone warp to Hotel-Oscar-Foxtrot Not that hard.
Or that,
|

Takara Mora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 20:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
I'm all for making things easier ... but with multiple languages playing the game, you might cause more problems than you'd solve. |

Leyla Constantine
University of Caille Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 20:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
Baaldor wrote:Drake Draconis wrote:Baaldor wrote:FC : Set Destination to linked System in fleet chat.
FC: Everyone warp to Hof (Hofjaldgund) Gate
Not too hard to work around it. Or FC: Everyone warp to Hotel-Oscar-Foxtrot Not that hard. Or that,
At this point it is a fact that that because of the hard to pronounce names people misunderstand where to warp even if the FC says "Hotel-Oscar-Foxtrot" And with regards to setting destination it's not always that you warp to the set destination. Plans might change suddenly.
No matter what you say at this point people are having difficulties because of the hard to pronounce names. I've seen with my own eyes people having these difficulties so for their sake and everyone else in New Eden who are having the same problems I urge every capsuleer to support this proposal.
|

Leyla Constantine
University of Caille Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 20:23:00 -
[7] - Quote
Takara Mora wrote:I'm all for making things easier ... but with multiple languages playing the game, you might cause more problems than you'd solve.
I fully understand your concerns and have thought them through but as it is now most of the planet and system names if not all are in icelandic even though the majority of the playerbase speaks english and understands english better.
So by changing the names we would not make problems but solve them and that is what we should do if we want to move EVE Online forward. So if you are not against EVE but want to see it prosper support this proposal and if not.
Well there isn't much I can do. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
247
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 20:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Warp to the first/second/third gate. right click > Stargates > third gate > warp (assuming your overview isn't set up to make this really easy)
Problem solved. |

Leyla Constantine
University of Caille Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 20:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Warp to the first/second/third gate. right click > Stargates > third gate > warp (assuming your overview isn't set up to make this really easy)
Problem solved.
I fully understand your point and it would solve the problem but unfortunately only for mining fleets. In fast fleet action people only have time to use shortcuts to warp quickly. So I am afraid that everyone will still have to support this issue and CCP will still have to urgently change this. |

Jodis Talvanen
State War Academy Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 20:49:00 -
[10] - Quote
New Eden is not in England or America, they don't speak English, as a result, the names are not English. |

Drake Draconis
Shadow Cadre Shadow Confederation
89
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 20:58:00 -
[11] - Quote
Leyla Constantine wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Warp to the first/second/third gate. right click > Stargates > third gate > warp (assuming your overview isn't set up to make this really easy)
Problem solved. I fully understand your point and it would solve the problem but unfortunately only for mining fleets. In fast fleet action people only have time to use shortcuts to warp quickly. So I am afraid that everyone will still have to support this issue and CCP will still have to urgently change this.
Stop right there.
Its very clear to us that you are obviously not famialr with the nature of fleet operations.
I suggest you take the time to talk to FC's before you start spouting off noobish gibberish like some kid who thinks he knows everything.
As its already been stated...there are multiple languages invovled...changing things for "YOUR sake" on behalf of "US" is not what I call a good excuse.
The system names are fine as they are....its a flavor of uniqueness..we dont need to mess it up.
You pick a method and you stick to it.
Changing names won't change a damn thing....its the same mechanics....
And your reasoning for "change of plans" is ridiculous.
The rule in Fleets is simple...you do as your told...or your ass is podded.
End of discussion.
some may not be as harsh...others worse yet. If you can't follow instructions..you have no business being in a fleet. Many corps...and alliances have an entire SOP on the subject.
I seriously doubt you have any experince to base your "complaint" (as opposed to proposal) on this subject at best.
In short...the solution is to get a good FC and to LISTEN to your FC....changing the coat of paint won't change a damn thing. |

Leyla Constantine
University of Caille Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 21:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
There are other clients than english but the language that the majority of eve players understand is english. Here in Denmark for example people start learning english from 4th grade. |

Drake Draconis
Shadow Cadre Shadow Confederation
89
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 21:12:00 -
[13] - Quote
Leyla Constantine wrote:There are other clients than english but the language that the majority of eve players understand is english. Here in Denmark for example people start learning english from 4th grade.
So you speak for everyone else then?
This coming from a 12 day old toon....in an NPC Corporation.
Yeah....sure....uh huh...yep.
Lets force OUR language on every one else.... thats gonna start a flame war.
I bleieve that is my exit signal.
*quitely exits out the back before the fist fight starts* |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 21:13:00 -
[14] - Quote
I've never encountered this problem TBH. It's easy to broadcast destinations and when giving commands it doesn't matter if you pronounce the system name correctly. All that matters is that you are able to differentiate it from the other options available within that system. If the name is unpronouncable, you use the first few letters and digits to achieve the same thing.
I'm also not sure what the name changes would actually really achieve, since this is a global game. Some people are going to have trouble with some names and others with different ones.You'd propably object, if all the names would be changed, so they would be easy and clear for me to pronounce, since finnish is my native language. On the other hand I can guarantee, that I won't pronounce all the words as they should be, if they were chosen by a native english speaker for example. I just don't see any particular reason why CCP should start catering to any one group on this issue. It's propably best, that they leave the names as they are. |

Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
149
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 21:56:00 -
[15] - Quote
I have a better idea...
Learn to pronounce the system names better.
Look at me! Solving problems again! Woohoo! Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
24
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 22:10:00 -
[16] - Quote
No, just no.
It would be like changing New York to something else just to make life easy for someone that's not a native English speaker.
The names we have in eve may be difficult to translate but these are the names we have and I never want to see them changed to something mundane. How bad would it be to have Bourynes changed to Bristol? Or Emogranlan to Blackpool? No freakin way dude!
Leave our names be. Not supported. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
257
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 00:12:00 -
[17] - Quote
Leyla Constantine wrote:I fully understand your point and it would solve the problem but unfortunately only for mining fleets. In fast fleet action people only have time to use shortcuts to warp quickly. So I am afraid that everyone will still have to support this issue and CCP will still have to urgently change this.
Fleet Commander broadcasts "Warp To" for a specific gate, entire fleet right-clicks broadcast and selects "warp to". What's difficult about that? There is no need to rename anything, since very few people need to use the names.
Alternately, spend some time with your fleet commander and get to know their accent and quirky pronunciation.
Or I could support your proposal and inform you that GÇö being Australian GÇö I have a hard time pronouncing any names other than "Bruce". I have no problem with all systems in EVE Online being named "Bruce". You're welcome. |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 02:20:00 -
[18] - Quote
There are ridiculously few systems that you could get confused which stargate to warp to with the first 3 letters.
The odd names add a flavor to the game, and do not hinder normal operations.
However, I could see the situation where, under panic, confusion would be had. But that would be the case even if the systems were named Tom, Joe, and Harry. |

Endovior
Brothers At Arms Intrepid Crossing
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 06:59:00 -
[19] - Quote
You're lucky... at least your systems have names.
I have little patience for anyone unable to refer to a merely unpronounceable name by the first three letters or whatnot, since that's more or less the only way to refer to systems in null. I'd advise that you simply get used to heading to 'Aitch-Oh-Eff' and whatnot... since in null, it's all stuff like 'Jay-Tac-See' and 'Ay-Wun-Arr'.
Not supported... or, at least, not before names get handed out to the null systems. |

Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
110
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 08:57:00 -
[20] - Quote
Endovior wrote:You're lucky... at least your systems have names.
I have little patience for anyone unable to refer to a merely unpronounceable name by the first three letters or whatnot, since that's more or less the only way to refer to systems in null. I'd advise that you simply get used to heading to 'Aitch-Oh-Eff' and whatnot... since in null, it's all stuff like 'Jay-Tac-See' and 'Ay-Wun-Arr'.
Not supported... or, at least, not before names get handed out to the null systems.
I support adding null-like names to all of high/low sec systems for easier identification. Could always keep the old names for RP sake - say, "ABC-12 (Caldari Prime)". It would make the moments when I just really need to get a fleet through Gallente space much les of a pain in the vocal chords.
A related (and somewhat more practical) issue is one system connecting to two similarly sounding systems, making it sometimes unclear which one the FC actually meant, especially if they have a strong accent. One particular example I remember off-hand is ZKYV in Pure Blind, which connects to F-NM and S-M. |

Cynthia Gallente
Zodiac Research Society
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 15:58:00 -
[21] - Quote
Leyla Constantine wrote:Well we all know how irritating it is sometimes not being able to understand which system the FC is ordering the fleet to warp to so I propose that we change the system names to something which is easier to pronounce for the sake of efficiency in the game.
I understand that some of the planets and systems were named after beta testers and I really appreciate their work and would like to take this opportunity to thank them on behalf of entire New Eden. But the reason they beta tested was to make EVE Online better and the way it can be made even more better is to simply change the planet and system names. That is what they would have wanted and that is the best way to honor their memory. I have no qualms with the naming conventions. I actually like the names of every single system in the game. ~The prophecy comes true. |

Mal Darkrunner
Zero Tau Research Institute
22
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:34:00 -
[22] - Quote
So your proposal is to change the names of (presumably) a large number of systems in order to make the game a bit easier for FCs or fleet members?
Names that have been part of the EVE galaxy for, what, 7 years or more?
For me this smacks too much of dumbing down.
I like the EVE system names just as they are - especially Haajinen which, when pronounced by a certain FC, sounded absolutely hilarious 
As others have already mentioned there are a number of ways in which to convey system names for fleet warps, etc. (e.g. linking in chat, using abbreviations or spelling, broadcast window, setting destinations/waypoints).
Perhaps if you're having trouble you could investigate some of those first, instead of trying to get the whole galaxy altered? |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
252
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 00:50:00 -
[23] - Quote
Mal Darkrunner wrote:So your proposal is to change the names of (presumably) a large number of systems in order to make the game a bit easier for FCs or fleet members?
Names that have been part of the EVE galaxy for, what, 7 years or more?
For me this smacks too much of dumbing down.
Also, the instant obsolescence of seven years worth of documents, blogs, videos, bookmarks, podcasts, notes, and memories. There are a lot of routes I know by heart. Renaming half the systems because some people find them hard to pronounce would mean that I'd have to relearn those routes AND unlearn the old ones that would confuse me. |

Solo Player
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 03:14:00 -
[24] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: Also, the instant obsolescence of seven years worth of documents, blogs, videos, bookmarks, podcasts, notes, and memories. There are a lot of routes I know by heart. Renaming half the systems because some people find them hard to pronounce would mean that I'd have to relearn those routes AND unlearn the old ones that would confuse me.
I'm pretty sure they'd update automatically.
I certainly don't support renaming those systems that have funny but sensible empire names. I still do mind the random names in 0.0 . How about allowing corporations to suggest a name for a system that hasn't got one yet once they have held sov and an outpost in the system for 6 months or more and built some upgrades? (CCP'd still have to check names for appropriateness) |

Rer Eirikr
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
50
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 05:04:00 -
[25] - Quote
Or we could just stick with what we have, because its fine plenty of ways to get around mispronunciation have already been given. |

Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 06:08:00 -
[26] - Quote
Solo Player wrote:I still do mind the random names in 0.0 . How about allowing corporations to suggest a name for a system that hasn't got one yet once they have held sov and an outpost in the system for 6 months or more and built some upgrades? (CCP'd still have to check names for appropriateness)
Most 0.0 players I know are as attached to our system names as highsec players are to Jita. |

Solo Player
60
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 12:10:00 -
[27] - Quote
Abdiel Kavash wrote:Solo Player wrote:I still do mind the random names in 0.0 . How about allowing corporations to suggest a name for a system that hasn't got one yet once they have held sov and an outpost in the system for 6 months or more and built some upgrades? (CCP'd still have to check names for appropriateness) Most 0.0 players I know are as attached to our system names as highsec players are to Jita.
I guessed as much - actually, let's get rid of both nao! ;)
OTT, I wouldn't want to force anybody to rename their home, but I imagine it could be an incentive for space holders that invest into upgrading their space to "leave a mark", so to speak.
|

Ms Twitch
Skunkwerx Manufacturing
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 19:29:00 -
[28] - Quote
I have been zipping around low sec and 0.0 for many years and either using the first three letters broadcasting has never failed me, if I am unable to get it 1'st time I just ask the FC for a repeat.
Not supported. |

Velicitia
Open Designs
56
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 19:55:00 -
[29] - Quote
Abdiel Kavash wrote:Solo Player wrote:I still do mind the random names in 0.0 . How about allowing corporations to suggest a name for a system that hasn't got one yet once they have held sov and an outpost in the system for 6 months or more and built some upgrades? (CCP'd still have to check names for appropriateness) Most 0.0 players I know are as attached to our system names as highsec players are to Jita.
yup, still have fond memories of getting the **** kicked out of me in NOL and J-L ... spent some time in 1DH too
For those of you who care ... NOL-M9 and J-LPX7 (can't remember the rest of 1DH off hand though). Haven't been there in YEARS, but still have the names burned into my memory... |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Putz.
261
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 01:06:00 -
[30] - Quote
Solo Player wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: Also, the instant obsolescence of seven years worth of documents, blogs, videos, bookmarks, podcasts, notes, and memories. There are a lot of routes I know by heart. Renaming half the systems because some people find them hard to pronounce would mean that I'd have to relearn those routes AND unlearn the old ones that would confuse me.
I'm pretty sure they'd update automatically.
Did you think that response through AT ALL? How are they going to autoupdate spreadsheets and youtube videos? |

Iella Wesirri
Dead Rats Tell No Tales
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 02:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
Tell you what sir. You come up with a list of, what, 2000 unique names for all the systems in eve that are all easy to pronounce and I'll fully support this idea. Please post your list here so we can all see them. I expect to see something by Wednesday.
- Iella |

De'Veldrin
Norse'Storm Battle Group Intrepid Crossing
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 16:22:00 -
[32] - Quote
Endovior wrote:You're lucky... at least your systems have names.
I have little patience for anyone unable to refer to a merely unpronounceable name by the first three letters or whatnot, since that's more or less the only way to refer to systems in null. I'd advise that you simply get used to heading to 'Aitch-Oh-Eff' and whatnot... since in null, it's all stuff like 'Jay-Tac-See' and 'Ay-Wun-Arr'.
Not supported... or, at least, not before names get handed out to the null systems.
Or the names we give them:
For example, nearly everyone in IRC refers to 4LNE-M as "Four Line". It's not hard to say, and everyone knows what you mean, including the non-native English speakers. E-BYOS is referred to as"eBay" by most of my corpmates, though in alliance fleets it's normally just "EB".
Honestly it doesn't matter what the name is as long as everyone you need to communicate with knows it by that name. Names are an arbitrary human convention. Pick one and stick with it. Unsub or don't.-á I don't care what your reasons are, and neither does anyone else.-á Just click the button and go away - or don't. |

Velicitia
Open Designs
67
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 16:57:00 -
[33] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:Endovior wrote:You're lucky... at least your systems have names.
I have little patience for anyone unable to refer to a merely unpronounceable name by the first three letters or whatnot, since that's more or less the only way to refer to systems in null. I'd advise that you simply get used to heading to 'Aitch-Oh-Eff' and whatnot... since in null, it's all stuff like 'Jay-Tac-See' and 'Ay-Wun-Arr'.
Not supported... or, at least, not before names get handed out to the null systems. Or the names we give them: For example, nearly everyone in IRC refers to 4LNE-M as "Four Line". It's not hard to say, and everyone knows what you mean, including the non-native English speakers. E-BYOS is referred to as"eBay" by most of my corpmates, though in alliance fleets it's normally just "EB". Honestly it doesn't matter what the name is as long as everyone you need to communicate with knows it by that name. Names are an arbitrary human convention. Pick one and stick with it.
Following that convention ... I remember "TPAR-G " being referred to as "Trap" (never flew there myself though). |

Solo Player
60
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 22:50:00 -
[34] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Solo Player wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: Also, the instant obsolescence of seven years worth of documents, blogs, videos, bookmarks, podcasts, notes, and memories. There are a lot of routes I know by heart. Renaming half the systems because some people find them hard to pronounce would mean that I'd have to relearn those routes AND unlearn the old ones that would confuse me.
I'm pretty sure they'd update automatically. Did you think that response through AT ALL? How are they going to autoupdate spreadsheets and youtube videos?
Sorry, I guessed I made the part I was referring to clear by underlining it in your quote. I was lazy and, apparently, wrong.
|

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
96
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 00:52:00 -
[35] - Quote
Solo Player wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Solo Player wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: Also, the instant obsolescence of seven years worth of documents, blogs, videos, bookmarks, podcasts, notes, and memories. There are a lot of routes I know by heart. Renaming half the systems because some people find them hard to pronounce would mean that I'd have to relearn those routes AND unlearn the old ones that would confuse me.
I'm pretty sure they'd update automatically. Did you think that response through AT ALL? How are they going to autoupdate spreadsheets and youtube videos? Sorry, I guessed I made the part I was referring to clear by underlining it in your quote. I was lazy and, apparently, wrong.
How does the bookmarks updating fix seven years worth of documents, blogs, videos, podcasts, notes, wikis, guides and memories? |

Solo Player
60
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 01:13:00 -
[36] - Quote
Danika Princip wrote: How does the bookmarks updating fix seven years worth of documents, blogs, videos, podcasts, notes, wikis, guides and memories?
Are you suggesting so? I'm not. Not that anyone really gives a twit about all that anyways - some people will keep referring to Mumbai as Bombay, and nobody gets confused. Besides: chill, girl.
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
264
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 01:42:00 -
[37] - Quote
Solo Player wrote:Sorry, I guessed I made the part I was referring to clear by underlining it in your quote. I was lazy and, apparently, wrong.
If I make a bookmark to sit 170 km off the kaaputenen gate in niarja and name it "Niar - Kaap 170" I completely understand the meaning of the name, but CCP can't change that with any sort of find and replace.
That's what I'm talking about, NOT the actually coordinates of the bookmarks.
It's completely unfeasible and would put far to much work in the hands of the players to fix all their data because CCP changed 8 years of established game content. |

Wilhelm Riley
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 02:08:00 -
[38] - Quote
These system names have been here since the games inception and people have managed up 'til now. Besides, easier to pronounce just means something people are families with, which in turn means that these wonderful system names will be replaced with generic and boring names. |

Kan'loch Lacoud
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 10:37:00 -
[39] - Quote
Leyla Constantine wrote:That is what they would have wanted and that is the best way to honor their memory.
That is one of the dumbest justifications ever, please don't use it. |

Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
97
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 11:25:00 -
[40] - Quote
Solo Player wrote:Danika Princip wrote: How does the bookmarks updating fix seven years worth of documents, blogs, videos, podcasts, notes, wikis, guides and memories?
Are you suggesting so? I'm not. Not that anyone really gives a twit about all that anyways - some people will keep referring to Mumbai as Bombay, and nobody gets confused. Besides: chill, girl.
yeah, no-one cares at all about all the guides, route planners, blogs, recruitment ads. wikis, or thier own memories. No-one at all.
nope.
No-one.
Get out. |

Tenobia Aybara
the Organ Grinder and Company Higginbotham and Bailey's Circus
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 20:34:00 -
[41] - Quote
I quite like the idea of letting corps that have had sov in a system for a long time give it a name, however I think it should be a bracketed attribute, such that the original alphanumeric name remains.
One alternative that I quite like is giving all systems two types of names, a 'real' name and a 'code'. I guess it would be possible to then allow players to choose which appears bracketed or something.
However I do not really see names as a big issue, I would prefer that they spend time updating lore or other essentially aesthetic aspects of the game first.
Danika Princip wrote:Solo Player wrote:Danika Princip wrote: How does the bookmarks updating fix seven years worth of documents, blogs, videos, podcasts, notes, wikis, guides and memories?
Are you suggesting so? I'm not. Not that anyone really gives a twit about all that anyways - some people will keep referring to Mumbai as Bombay, and nobody gets confused. Besides: chill, girl. yeah, no-one cares at all about all the guides, route planners, blogs, recruitment ads. wikis, or thier own memories. No-one at all. nope. No-one. Get out.
He quite clearly underlined JUST bookmarks, therefore his comment was just aimed at bookmarks. The implication was that it did not belong in the list of things which would not update. However the point another raised about the names we give our bookmarks is a valid one. |

Uronksur Suth
Viziam Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:38:00 -
[42] - Quote
Leyla Constantine wrote:Well we all know how irritating it is sometimes not being able to understand which system the FC is ordering the fleet to warp to so I propose that we change the system names to something which is easier to pronounce for the sake of efficiency in the game.
I understand that some of the planets and systems were named after beta testers and I really appreciate their work and would like to take this opportunity to thank them on behalf of entire New Eden. But the reason they beta tested was to make EVE Online better and the way it can be made even more better is to simply change the planet and system names. That is what they would have wanted and that is the best way to honor their memory.
No. There's no reason to have an in-universe game change simply because some FC's aren't imaginative enough to figure out such a simple issue. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |