EVE Search - another battle in x4- Fix vs SA

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

another battle in x4- Fix vs SA

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
USN CVN73	Posted - 2006.02.25 07:49:00 - [1] just wanted to thank Fix for the fight in x4- Engagement was a good heads up battle with Fix gang jumping into x4- were Sa was waiting. mostly even 13 vs 13ish give or take but fairly even engagement. Sadly both sides was eaten by the lag monster that mysteriously engulfed both Fix and SA. Thank u Fix for the fight. sadly we couldnt enjoy the experience even with a small gang... USN
Aceformat	Posted - 2006.02.25 07:52:00 - [2] Edited by: Aceformat on 25/02/2006 07:52:51 The reason behind the lag monster was probably due to the hardware maintaining the absolute blood bath that was D-7 to H-W in the north (Over 200 ships), after breaking the new hardware in and then in the end breaking it
Badboy Geezer	Posted - 2006.02.25 11:23:00 - [3] so much for the new hardware... amd is sucky for servers
Mang0o	Posted - 2006.02.25 11:54:00 - [4] im eating muffins its very good I love you Mang0o, take a guess why -Eris
Zarthanon	Posted - 2006.02.25 11:57:00 - [5] Originally by: Mang0o im eating muffins its very good Mang0o 4tw! Originally by: ParMizaN i mayv or may nit abe a bit drunk Originally by: Buddrow TO THETR DRUMNBS OF WAR WET GHO
Rexthor Hammerfists	Posted - 2006.02.25 13:23:00 - [6] we had a 20v20 engagement vs, mm i forgot, yest. - was clear and alot of fun. - Purple Conquered The World, We the Universe.
Dianabolic	Posted - 2006.02.25 13:41:00 - [7] Originally by: Badboy Geezer so much for the new hardware... amd is sucky for servers Try waiting for the blood patch that is programmed to take advantage of the new servers before spouting off, k? Originally by: Thomas Jefferson A society that will trade a little liberty for a little security will lose both and deserve neither
Badboy Geezer	Posted - 2006.02.25 14:14:00 - [8] Originally by: Dianabolic Originally by: Badboy Geezer so much for the new hardware... amd is sucky for servers Try waiting for the blood patch that is programmed to take advantage of the new servers before spouting off, k? heh, well don't get offended, ccp made a positive step with this server upgrade. but intel > amd when it comes to server jobs ;)
Kaaii	Posted - 2006.02.25 14:57:00 - [9] I saw that huge kill blob on the map last nite, it looked ugly.. "..Id rather fall beside 10 lions, than stand with One thousand sheep.."
Cerwyn Taraman	Posted - 2006.02.25 15:00:00 - [10] Valar has been posting about the lag issues here (including that huge battle you mentioned): http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=299096 Apparently its not CPU load that is causing the lag, its something else that they are trying to figure out. CT
USN CVN73	Posted - 2006.02.25 15:08:00 - [11] yes i think your right. it wasnt cpu related. interestingly all moduals were working however the ships didnt respond. also the frame rate was very smooth. previous lag monster everything just froze. so yes improvement has been made but now a new version of the lag monster is here hehe... as for waiting for more patches upon patches upon patches i think everyone on the eve community are done with excuses. there are many people already quitting game sadly lots of old school dont play anymore because game isnt fun anymore and that once enjoyable gank and good ol even pvp engagements as small as 15 on each side cant escape Lag Monster. Who remembers the day u could throw 200 ships in any system and just Duke it out? I do... USN CVN72&73
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.25 15:19:00 - [12] Originally by: Badboy Geezer Originally by: Dianabolic Originally by: Badboy Geezer so much for the new hardware... amd is sucky for servers Try waiting for the blood patch that is programmed to take advantage of the new servers before spouting off, k? heh, well don't get offended, ccp made a positive step with this server upgrade. but intel > amd when it comes to server jobs ;) Intel is certainly not better at AMD especially at servers [23] Member: Official Forum Warrior What's with the blue robots? Click my sig.
It WasntMe	Posted - 2006.02.25 15:54:00 - [13] ccp tested intel and amd and amd was better
tomw	Posted - 2006.02.25 17:43:00 - [14] Originally by: USN CVN73 Who remembers the day u could throw 200 ships in any system and just Duke it out? I do... USN CVN72&73 i remember those days, i have very fond memorys of the dsma/cfs/star vs fa/fix "qdf then if i remember", orion and a few others. that first big battle in tapar was the single most fun event ive had. lately its been kinda a slump due to the whole lag thing.. _______________________________________________ Dragons united is now recruiting, contact tuberider or myself for info
Xianthar	Posted - 2006.02.25 19:10:00 - [15] Originally by: Badboy Geezer Originally by: Dianabolic Originally by: Badboy Geezer so much for the new hardware... amd is sucky for servers Try waiting for the blood patch that is programmed to take advantage of the new servers before spouting off, k? heh, well don't get offended, ccp made a positive step with this server upgrade. but intel > amd when it comes to server jobs ;) hmmm....thats not what the market share statistics are showing for the last few years....AMD is gaining in the server/workstation market, intel is losing... -xian
Findail	Posted - 2006.02.25 20:23:00 - [16] Yeah, what should have been a fun fight was really messed up with the lag. That was worse than large fleet battles I really hope CCP can sort the lag... I thought my PC had locked up for a while there Anyway, thanks to the SA guys for bringing a good, smack-free fight. Was still fun. And good on Shivan for hanging in there right to the end even though it cost him a recon ship. Good stuff.
Prince Asmodai	Posted - 2006.02.25 21:52:00 - [17] EVERYONE knows that DUAL opty's PWN ALLLL!!!!!
Badboy Geezer	Posted - 2006.02.25 22:45:00 - [18] Originally by: Xianthar Originally by: Badboy Geezer Originally by: Dianabolic Originally by: Badboy Geezer so much for the new hardware... amd is sucky for servers Try waiting for the blood patch that is programmed to take advantage of the new servers before spouting off, k? heh, well don't get offended, ccp made a positive step with this server upgrade. but intel > amd when it comes to server jobs ;) hmmm....thats not what the market share statistics are showing for the last few years....AMD is gaining in the server/workstation market, intel is losing... -xian do you guys work with those things or on testing? if not dont make comments like amd > intel in server jobs. pls, i made thousands of tests and it doesnt show what propaganda is, hehe. when it comes to full load, to its limits, intel based server, if rightly configured, will pwn any amd opteron combination. all in all, ccp made a good move by moving to blade servers. p.s. fix and SA hf
Ashido	Posted - 2006.02.25 23:30:00 - [19] What ever happened to You fight You go sleep You fight etc etc Instead of patting each other on the back for the fight after everyone
Nira Li	Posted - 2006.02.25 23:37:00 - [20] We just had a 10 vs 20 battle in empire with no lag except for one of our pilots that crashed but it seems it's down to what computers and connection ppl have now You Will Cry My Name
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.25 23:44:00 - [21] Originally by: Ashido What ever happened to You fight You go sleep You fight etc etc Instead of patting each other on the back for the fight after everyone yeah where's the hate? Originally by: Zzazzt Originally by: thoth foc PA doesnt stand for anything.. Punchbag Alliance...
USN CVN73	Posted - 2006.02.26 01:15:00 - [22] Originally by: Nira Li Edited by: Nira Li on 25/02/2006 23:40:42 We just had a 10 vs 20 battle in empire with 50+ in local with no lag except for one of our pilots that crashed but it seems it's down to what computers and connection ppl have now in some cases with old computers i would agree but with new hardware and a **** load of ram 4gigs and a t1 connection or better if your getting same issues as everyone else then u point fingers to the game not indivisuals personal hardware...
Brantoc	Posted - 2006.02.26 04:02:00 - [23] Originally by: Badboy Geezer heh, well don't get offended, ccp made a positive step with this server upgrade. but intel > amd when it comes to server jobs ;) Intel > AMD in 2001 AMD > Intel in 2005-2006

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.