| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[1]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[2]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[3]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[4]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[5]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[6]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[7]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[8]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[9]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[10]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[11]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[12]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[13]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[14]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[15]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[16]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[17]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[18]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[19]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[20]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[21]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[22]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[23]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[24]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[25]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[26]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[27]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[28]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[29]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|

Astatine Eightyfive
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 00:28:00 -
[30]
It's 2006... you've got a new cluster of sexay opterons... can we stop truncating the killmails?
I can't imagine the extra 1-2kb of bandwidth everytime someone gets killed would add up to more than a half meg/sec bandwidth.
On more of a wishlist side, any chance of getting PGP signed killmails? Kills don't happen that often, and since the killmails are an integral part to many corp's operations, being able to verify them against a key would stop forged mails instantly.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |