| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
MaiLina KaTar
   |
Posted - 2003.09.04 16:50:00 -
[31]
I¦d also love to see formations for the gang-feature.
Mai's Idealog |
Bad Harlequin
|
Posted - 2003.09.04 17:14:00 -
[32]
cool stuff.
Lots and lots of cool stuff.
I'd like to point everyone at Patch Review and the Chaos server. If you aren't checking things out and making your voice heard, how is anyone to know your concern? The signal-to-noise ratio on (any) General forums 'sjust too gawdawful for the devs to wade thru - the patch review has its share of chaff too but it's a wee bit more focused.
Read Travelers' patchlog, check out chaos - you can actually play with stuff that doesn't exist yet and give feedback to the devs that may change it! How cool is that?
As for events, well, that's only slightly patch-related. Improved content coming thru Papa Smurf's underutilized Agent system, player-owned Things In Space, and suchlike, will make events a little wider in scope and variety, IMHO, but they still are staff-dependent more so than code.
Patchwise, all i can (continue) to say is that i hope we've all learned that introducing X without -X is a bad idea. I.e., warp scramblers being ingame so long without stabilizers, and i've *still* yet to see a counter to the Webs. So i hope that as stuff is introduced, the countermeasures (if any) is introduced at the same time or in VERY short order (like, the next week at the latest...).
This is primarily so that if something turns out to be horribly imbalanced we're not all sitting on our thumbs while the game is un-whacked. 
You are in a maze of twisty little asteroids, all alike. |
Nightwing
|
Posted - 2003.09.04 18:36:00 -
[33]
1-Most of the changes on Chaos now.(once stability reached)
2-Player owned equipment for Deep Space (Not Ships)i.e. refinery's, stations, turrets, etc...
3-Pirate Battleships!!!
4-Promised changes to drops!
5-Boosters/implants
6-ALL skills currently ingame->functional
7-Smuggling
8-Slow introduction of new Tech
9-Jove space open and EXTREMELY HOSTILE!!
10-BOUNTY HUNTING LICENSES!!! so that you can collect the bounties on those who carefully remain at less than -5 (in magnitude) and hole up in empire space so Concord protects them.
|
Aleister Crowley
|
Posted - 2003.09.04 19:05:00 -
[34]
1) Less events
2) Working missions
3) Less major changes to standard modules
4) A true and universe wide 'risk vs reward' analysys. With appropriate changes to up certain rewards and add risk to others.
5) Faster paced addition of technology (NOT EVENT DRIVEN)
6) An in-game guide to sec status.
7) Station activities.
8) Planet/moon interaction.
9) A DYNAMIC trade economy.
10) Fix the chat bugs.
11) Put in at least moderate naming convention filters.
12) Balance out locations of difficult NPC pirates to stations/empire space.
'Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law' |
scam artist
|
Posted - 2003.09.04 19:35:00 -
[35]
double all ships armour and shields to counter server instability
these boards need a search engine |
Jebba IV
|
Posted - 2003.09.04 19:54:00 -
[36]
stockmarket
events/quests
player owned stations
deep core mining
|
Drutort
|
Posted - 2003.09.04 21:28:00 -
[37]
The ability for alliances and player owed regions or conquest to be put in!! so that things can be recognized in the gameą.
I really doubt that system will ever come iną we will be forced to stay in a region with NPC control that they couldnĘt do jack **** really if we could take overą but we canĘt
Would be nice to build stations and over time take over an area and have it be clamed as yours etcą and be recognized on the MAP!!
I mean if its NOT ABOUT THE PLAYER, then who cares about NPC??
btw i would to add everything else that the above people said 
support Idea: QuickInfo an alternative to ShowInfo
my MoBlog |
Moph
|
Posted - 2003.09.04 21:53:00 -
[38]
- group tactics
- gang offensive formations
- gang deffensive formations
- group targetting
- destroyable stations
- wrecks :) i wish so
|
cold lazarus
|
Posted - 2003.09.04 21:57:00 -
[39]
Some way to tell if a player has logged out or CTD'd so the ship will stay in the battle if he/she has logged out... but will disapear if CTD... hate the lamers who log out 
|
Tristan
|
Posted - 2003.09.04 22:00:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Tristan on 04/09/2003 22:00:59
stations and sentry guns
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |