EVE Search - Should FW be extended to high sec?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Warfare & Tactics

Should FW be extended to high sec?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Kaivar Lancer Federal Defense Union 365	Posted - 2013.12.01 21:07:00 - [1] - Quote The faction war seems kinda meaningless if it's only restricted to some arbitrary low sec systems. I think FW would become more immersive if empires could take over every system in both high sec and low sec, with perhaps the exception of the capital system. This shouldn't affect non-FW players (or at least they shouldn't be blapped). Who knows, maybe the Gallente flag will fly over Jita 4-4 one day.
Salicaz CTRL-Q Iron Oxide. 183	Posted - 2013.12.01 21:52:00 - [2] - Quote Kaivar Lancer wrote: The faction war seems kinda meaningless if it's only restricted to some arbitrary low sec systems. I think FW would become more immersive if empires could take over every system in both high sec and low sec, with perhaps the exception of the capital system. This shouldn't affect non-FW players (or at least they shouldn't be blapped). Who knows, maybe the Gallente flag will fly over Jita 4-4 one day. In a lore point of view aren't we fighting on behalf of the empires on the fringes of said empires or something close? They dont want to engage in real conflicts with each otheras they are expensive in cost and lives but capsuleers can do it for them? Game balance wise you still can do fw in highsec, I've ganked a lot of militia pilots in high sec, its just harder. But imo fw belongs in low sec.
Veshta Yoshida PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 809	Posted - 2013.12.01 23:30:00 - [3] - Quote Salicaz wrote: Kaivar Lancer wrote: The faction war seems kinda meaningless if it's only restricted to some arbitrary low sec systems. I think FW would become more immersive if empires could take over every system in both high sec and low sec, with perhaps the exception of the capital system. This shouldn't affect non-FW players (or at least they shouldn't be blapped). Who knows, maybe the Gallente flag will fly over Jita 4-4 one day. In a lore point of view aren't we fighting on behalf of the empires on the fringes of said empires or something close? They dont want to engage in real conflicts with each otheras they are expensive in cost and lives but capsuleers can do it for them? Game balance wise you still can do fw in highsec, I've ganked a lot of militia pilots in high sec, its just harder. But imo fw belongs in low sec. Precisely, it is war by proxy, specifically said so in the Concord thingie if I recall .. allowed to prevent all out war. To include Empire space proper would be tantamount to open declarations which would probably be great fun but the omni-present gate camps and docking games that follows would become stale very quickly and kill Eve dead as sure as if CCP sold out to Zynga (now there's a nightmare!) by making the game as a whole a one trick pony. That said. Over the years there has been calls to allow FW to influence aspects of high-sec life and that could be harnessed quite effectively to make things a lot more interesting overall. Could be an expansion-contraction type of thing, with things going badly abroad, things at home gets easier and vice versa .. for instance, better mining/lower taxes when troops are hurting for resupply.
X Gallentius Justified Chaos 1723	Posted - 2013.12.02 00:12:00 - [4] - Quote Go to high sec CONCORD space. Fight all you want since they do not bar any militia from their systems.
Baron' Soontir Fel Justified Chaos 91	Posted - 2013.12.02 04:59:00 - [5] - Quote It would be really cool if the high sec border systems (1-2 jumps) got converted to low-sec if the other side controlled the border systems. So the Gallente could push though important high-sec hubs like Ichoriya/Onnamon/Nourv and make them low-sec, which shows how the nation is losing control/strength.
Bad Messenger Nasranite Watch OLD MAN GANG 604	Posted - 2013.12.02 10:00:00 - [6] - Quote No, it already is.
Leto Thule Sons of Retribution 172	Posted - 2013.12.02 14:45:00 - [7] - Quote Baron' Soontir Fel wrote: It would be really cool if the high sec border systems (1-2 jumps) got converted to low-sec if the other side controlled the border systems. So the Gallente could push though important high-sec hubs like Ichoriya/Onnamon/Nourv and make them low-sec, which shows how the nation is losing control/strength. That would be awesome. Killboard https://zkillboard.com/character/90841161/
Dan Carter Murray 448	Posted - 2013.12.02 14:51:00 - [8] - Quote change LP stores in highsec based on the garbage tier system currently in place for FW http://mfi.re/?j7ldoco 50GB free space @ MediaFire.com
Flyinghotpocket Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica 208	Posted - 2013.12.02 16:12:00 - [9] - Quote would be nice if the amarr highsec navy was rebalanced so that even with two 90% webs they didnt miss every single shot
inVictu5 AirBorNe MoBiliZed sTriKe tEaM 10	Posted - 2013.12.02 16:17:00 - [10] - Quote Baron' Soontir Fel wrote: It would be really cool if the high sec border systems (1-2 jumps) got converted to low-sec if the other side controlled the border systems. So the Gallente could push though important high-sec hubs like Ichoriya/Onnamon/Nourv and make them low-sec, which shows how the nation is losing control/strength. I agree. Theres no creativity at CCP atm. Almost all the good ideas came from the players.

X Gallentius Justified Chaos 1723	Posted - 2013.12.02 16:22:00 - [11] - Quote Dan Carter Murray wrote: change LP stores in highsec based on the garbage tier system currently in place for FW lol right now all the High Sec Mission Farmers get screwed when their side is winning (isk/lp drops on most of their faction navy items).
Machiavelli's Nemesis Angry Mustellid 357	Posted - 2013.12.02 17:15:00 - [12] - Quote Remove highsec. Oh and nullsec. No one actually lives in these places, it's just a sea of bots and scrubs.
Bad Messenger Nasranite Watch OLD MAN GANG 604	Posted - 2013.12.02 19:00:00 - [13] - Quote Machiavelli's Nemesis wrote: Remove highsec. Oh and nullsec. No one actually lives in these places, it's just a sea of bots and scrubs. i think highsec has quite much active people, there is just no reason to go lowsec or 0.0.
March rabbit True Horde 895	Posted - 2013.12.03 13:04:00 - [14] - Quote Bad Messenger wrote: Machiavelli's Nemesis wrote: Remove highsec. Oh and nullsec. No one actually lives in these places, it's just a sea of bots and scrubs. i think highsec has quite much active people, there is just no reason to go lowsec or 0.0. well. actually there is one reason to go there: to see how boring and dead this space. After spending some time in low/0.0 you return to trade hub and .... You see lots of people who can just speak and not try to kill each other! The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
Dan Carter Murray 449	Posted - 2013.12.03 14:55:00 - [15] - Quote X Gallentius wrote: Dan Carter Murray wrote: change LP stores in highsec based on the garbage tier system currently in place for FW lol right now all the High Sec Mission Farmers get screwed when their side is winning (isk/lp drops on most of their faction navy items). which is why each npc corp should supply unique items http://mfi.re/?j7ldoco 50GB free space @ MediaFire.com
Nimrod vanHall Martyr's Vengence Nulli Secunda 38	Posted - 2013.12.03 20:16:00 - [16] - Quote Dan Carter Murray wrote: X Gallentius wrote: Dan Carter Murray wrote: change LP stores in highsec based on the garbage tier system currently in place for FW lol right now all the High Sec Mission Farmers get screwed when their side is winning (isk/lp drops on most of their faction navy items). which is why each npc corp should supply unique items So true
Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance 55	Posted - 2013.12.09 14:36:00 - [17] - Quote Baron' Soontir Fel wrote: It would be really cool if the high sec border systems (1-2 jumps) got converted to low-sec if the other side controlled the border systems. So the Gallente could push though important high-sec hubs like Ichoriya/Onnamon/Nourv and make them low-sec, which shows how the nation is losing control/strength. that's a cool idea - could totally start a fail cascade that spreads to Eve Gate and back again


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.