I d rather have my idea out there before the next horrible idea comes around... like a personal SMA that can store 3 cruisers per Person ....

For example when you fly a ship with a Corp Hangar, you got those nice green icons, why cannot i have a SMA with that functions or mark my ship to be bound to my pilot only ... LIKE i dont know CAR KEYS?

womwomwowmwoaugharwajwowoooommm

for the last time... POS related changed are NOT wormhole issues. theyre POS issues.

Now someone could say: GÇ£Okay but Wormholes were never intended to be colonized.GÇ¥ Well, the City of Mexico wasnGÇÖt expecting the slum settlements either but apparently now they got to deal with it.

1 thing Bert.. The WH's as anomaly part..

I think one of the greatest parts of w-space is that people don't scan their entire chain, cause lazy.. When you watch an enemy fleet and know they doesn't know where your WH is, cause they havn't dropped probes to find it.
If everyone had the WH's as anomalies, you would loose that surprise, which is also why the autoupdating siglist is bullshit.

Also, why is it, that CCP every damn patch goes "no new content for w-space" and yet, they always manage to ruin the wormhole effects or our gameplay.. It is pretty damn impressive tbh.

Also, why is it, that CCP every damn patch goes "no new content for w-space" and yet, they always manage to ruin the wormhole effects or our gameplay.. It is pretty damn impressive tbh.

Just want to point out that not having to scan wormholes would change pvp in a pretty harmful way, possibly killing WH space.

If wormholes were warpable then we would pretty much instantly have the entire chain scouted, nothing would be a surprise. Small corps/farmers/solo would also be much less viable.

Quite often when scouting a chain, if we run into potential pew we don't want to drop probes and alert the pew to POS up. In effect this means we know the chain up to that system and no further, which can and has turned into three way fights. This is about the only time two fleets can come together without scouting each other first. ( unless your Boris, in which case your welp your fleet into another unscouted fleet that is known for having more numbers with half your fleet not aligned/afk and no logistics )

The fun in wormholes is not the Scanning part, its the layout of the chains itself, in what system to fight, who is also connected and what is behind the next hole ... NOT IGNORING GAS, RELIC and DATA SITES ... THATS NOT UNKNOWN THATS ******* ACCOUNTANTS WORK!

Some1's been blue balled in C4 space a bit too much. Only logical thing to explain your frothing. C4 space is pratically perfect as it is right now & honestly is the TRUE WH space. I'd go as far to say it's the most balanced space in all of EvE.

Some1's been blue balled in C4 space a bit too much. Only logical thing to explain your frothing. C4 space is pratically perfect as it is right now & honestly is the TRUE WH space. I'd go as far to say it's the most balanced space in all of EvE.

IsupportBert.com

I'm still having trouble making out this wall of text.

Is this basically the same thread that comes around every few months? We are bored, pew is dead bla bla bla?

Honestly you guys are worse then Treehuggers, at least they can safe one Tree each.

Damn here herb, did you write this while logged off in our home ??

sooo much rabble rabble

as always . . . Jack speaks the truth, the fewer CCP hands in w space the better !!

Herbb, My Man!

Well I agree with some (alliance bms and dual static c4's), dissagree with toher (no-scan wh's)

But overall CCP should look at wormholes and fix some low hanging fruits thing to make it flourish again like it used too


Also: RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE FIX WH CCP RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE (are you satisfied Herbb?)

I'm not asking them to fix it... they are doing a horrible job at it... its time for us to fix it with them...and by us i mean everybody and i m asking everybody to pull better ideas out of their holes :)

Dual static C4''s
More "random" wormholes spawning
"fix" c5/c6 cap escalation farming to force people out of their holes
fix wormholes sound/animation
allaince bookmarks
personal SMA's
more settings for personal hangars and SMA (allow person you want to to have access to them)
random spawns for sleepers sites

Bert for CSM! Speaking of CSM, where are our two dually appointed CSM duders for all this Rabble Rabble?!

But more than anything. All the hidden lore stuff that we obviously havent figured out fully yet. More of it. And make it lead to something new in wormholes. If we can make gates in future, why not wormholes to unknown destinations (random wh generator to random wh, maybe to a new type of wormhole. Yeah blasphemy. But )?

- Calaretu

Dual static C4''s
More "random" wormholes spawning
"fix" c5/c6 cap escalation farming to force people out of their holes
fix wormholes sound/animation
allaince bookmarks
personal SMA's
more settings for personal hangars and SMA (allow person you want to to have access to them)
random spawns for sleepers sites

Not bored, don't want to change WH space because you are. F*** off like the last thirty thousand with **** ideas of how to change WH's to how they want it.

you are a feisty one, now do it like the others and please go back to your mommies breast ... because "YOU DIDNT READ THE DISCLAIMER!!!!"

You could try not being in a ****** alliance that relies on one person to create it's content. We want our alliance name back.

Naw QT i have almost missed your threads of crazy, but don't sweat it Bert is a whole new level of crazy to fill your shoes.

You could try not being in a ****** alliance that relies on one person to create it's content. We want our alliance name back.

My threads will return soonGäó



LOL Blue fire is still alive? Wow. Thats cute.

LOL Blue fire is still alive? Wow. Thats cute.

Blue-Fire is as active if not more active then HK

I'll have you know evewho.com rates HK as "Quite Active" and you guys as "Active".

That means we have a whole "Quite" more activity than you do and because it's on the internet, you know it's true.

LOL Blue fire is still alive? Wow. Thats cute.

Ah thanks for pointing that out didn't know that metric existed. Was just goin off kills each month **** me right

Because most of you guys are still in wormholes...

More on topic, I believe c4s with double static would be totally awesome.



Just imagine:

> C4 with H900 and P060, briding between c1 and c5, with maybe even a c4-k162. A smaller inustrial corp could move into that and run highend ladars, aswell as c4-groupcontent and c1-solocontent.

> C4 with N766 and C247, connecting to both the pretty vibrating c2-spaces aswell as those more carebearish/k-space oriented c3-groups. Would also mean that people living in that c4 would have a minimum of 2 k-space exits. Those routes are usually where the action is at.

> Or a c4 with double U574. C4 up to two c6s, the equivalent of the current c5 static c6 black hole system with one planet and two moons.


Also Fozzie hinted that the whole local-thingy is getting revamped, so I'd be really interested to see how that works out for w-space regarding pvp. Big changes are coming from over there I guess.

well I mean, we can't all sit in Amarr and Niarja just whoring on kills all day. But hey, if you wanna go out to null and kill all the thrashers and skiffs your heart can take, then more power to you.

I'd say screw C4's and look at the bigger picture... Suggested it before and I will do so yet again; new randomized static for ALL classes of holes. And by randomized static I mean a hole that is static only in the way that a new one respawns after it is closed, in all other ways it would be randomized between different w-space classes. No kspace random statics simply to keep it from becoming too easy to get fuel and other crap in. More interaction always results in more action, one way or another. And more action means more content.

And **** Bert, I go away from the game for awhile and you go and leave. Now who's going to shoot me randomly when I'm fleeted with them?

Extra static for each C4 and extra static (with random destination class/space) for each black hole - thats right, black hole C2s and C4s would have three statics \o/