Click-bait for a blog?

Buy your own advert.

Why is null sec important to the eve player, it offers nothing to me other than large 6 hour tidi battles defending other peoples moon goo mining setups? CCP needs to make null sec more appealing. We need better content, and we need to entice people to kill each other over said content.

Why is null sec important to the eve player, it offers nothing to me other than large 6 hour tidi battles defending other peoples moon goo mining setups? CCP needs to make null sec more appealing. We need better content, and we need to entice people to kill each other over said content.

Why is null sec important to the eve player, it offers nothing to me other than large 6 hour tidi battles defending other peoples moon goo mining setups? CCP needs to make null sec more appealing. We need better content, and we need to entice people to kill each other over said content.

We need better content

A hilarious troll!

Nullsec is very dead, except for the action that I don't like

Nullsec is full of structures and structures are Content!(tm) Quit whining.

So how can CCP fix null sec?

So how can CCP fix null sec?

Why is null sec important to the eve player, it offers nothing to me other than large 6 hour tidi battles defending other peoples moon goo mining setups? CCP needs to make null sec more appealing. We need better content, and we need to entice people to kill each other over said content.

null is dead ... long live null

fighting for a non blue eve

Just because it has nothing to offer you does not mean it is dead.

If I were you, I would ponder your statement a while longer before labeling space that contains more than half of the relevant playerbase as "dead."

Null will be a happy place full of good fights

Last indication from CCP was 70% of players alts, nubs, bots and scammers are in high.

This was a stealth ban capitals post, right?


Fixed that up for you.

Nah sorry. You don't get to rewrite what the devs released to suit your agenda.

This was a stealth ban capitals post, right?

Fixed that up for you.

I hear 70% of all statistics are made up, entirely subjective, or completely inaccurate.

Do you maybe have some percentages to confirm that?

Nah sorry. You don't get to rewrite what the devs released to suit your agenda.

(CCP) Affinity referred to some recent detailed research CCP has done which indicates that the players who stick around longest tend to do everything, while pure PvE players tend to churn out of the game.

It would be a shame if you were, well, rewriting what the devs released to suit your agenda.

The problem I see with nullsec is that the major alliances are in a stalemate, and CCP probably wants it this way to keep subscribers, if a major alliance lost they may all quit the game. CCPs main focus is to attract newbies to the game for the sharks to feed on with gate camps and grief gameplay mechanics. EvE will never have a winner, just a bunch of whiners.

Good thing our newbies turn into sharks

Null is the same as it was 5 years ago. The only thing that has changed is more people figured out it was smoke an mirrors. 90% of us were destined to be herds in high sec with a few billion in our wallet. We don't have the time or the desire to live EVE or freeload of the people who do.

The sea is empty and full of sharks, soon they feed on each other.

OP doesn't have a clue what is going on in null (no pandas there, sorry).

This article shows that null had more content than high, low and WH combined.

PS. I'm not goon and don't have any relationship to them, but reading eve news is actually what makes me want to log in again and again.

We should get Concord in null sec.

Then it would be perfect !

Right OP ?

Right ?

OP doesn't have a clue what is going on in null (no pandas there, sorry).

This article shows that null had more content than high, low and WH combined.

PS. I'm not goon and don't have any relationship to them, but reading eve news is actually what makes me want to log in again and again.

That's not content. That's players running the only pvp themepark ride that exists in null - The Blobbatron. A ride that involves shooting a structure till its 30% shields, then returning 24 hours later with as many people as possible to shoot the remaining HP. The enemy also brings as many people as possible in an attempt to a) kill an inferior force or b) crash the server if the enemy force is superior. The players then petition CCP for reimbursements and the force left holding the system attempts to gank those unlucky players logging in after the crash.

Why is null sec important to the eve player, it offers nothing to me other than large 6 hour tidi battles defending other peoples moon goo mining setups? CCP needs to make null sec more appealing. We need better content, and we need to entice people to kill each other over said content.

You know that structures reinforce at 25% shields and stuff like Ihubs/stations reinforce again at 50% armor, right?

SBUs don't reinforce

The length of a reinforcement timer can vary from 0 if idiots don't stront to over 2 days for some structures.

That's not content. That's players running the only pvp themepark ride that exists in null - The Blobbatron. A ride that involves shooting a structure till its 30% shields, then returning 24 hours later with as many people as possible to shoot the remaining HP. The enemy also brings as many people as possible in an attempt to a) kill an inferior force or b) crash the server if the enemy force is superior. The players then petition CCP for reimbursements and the force left holding the system attempts to gank those unlucky players logging in after the crash.


Strangely this themepark ride is universally hated by all involved but they still can't seem to stop riding it or defending it.

How's it doing in lowsec? Apart from FW that is.

How's it doing in lowsec? Apart from FW that is.

Dude. This is a video game. What isn't smoke and mirrors?

I'll be honest...

Nul is the most boring thing I've experienced in EVE. It's not for everyone.