Originally by: pershphanie

---

how about we just say we had a GF and do it again tomarrow?

---

Originally by: TickTackTuck

---

its funny how F-E says their allies failed (=> PA, NBSI, G, Iron allthough G/Iron were never allies) considering that they are an 1800 member alliance while .5. has just a fraction of it.
So u are now saying u were too incompetent/weak on ur own to beat a much smaller alliance?
Not to mention that u being alone is far from the truth, PA and NBSI might not have shown a good perfomance, still it was at least 2 additional alliances on ur side and that u decided to ally .5. is no sign of strength or a question of choosing "better" allies.
Facts are u were to scared of .5. to do things on ur own so u decided u better ally them instead of fight em.
Now there is hardly any risk for F-E vs G/Iron cause u know with .5. on ur side and the possibility of BoB joining in the fight if it should get rough for ur side there wont be any chance for u to get into real trouble.
Sure in a political sense its maybe the right decission but then plz stop to say that this decission is based on the weakness of others.
Ur relationship with .5. is on nothing else based than ur own weakness and to hear that G/Iron let u "alone" is simply disgusting.
They were at least able to do their part of work and stop BoB, ASCN and others while u with a lot bigger player base werent able to stop just one alliance.
PA and NBSI got bashed a lot on the board here but F-E would deserve it so much more, not because u decided to go a different way without them but simply because u betrayed everything u were fighting for up to that point and made a 180 degree change of ur political direction solely based on the fear of having to deal with a strong enemy.

---