| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Mike Adoulin
Adolescent Radioactive Pirate Hamsters
530
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 11:46:00 -
[31] - Quote
I'm still holding out for Da Monk.
*crosses fingers* Everything in EVE is a trap. And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)
|

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
441
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 15:54:00 -
[32] - Quote
Zeus Maximo wrote: ... However mercs are actually quite rare in high sec. You would probably get more votes if you related to Ivy League/Incursion runners/Industrial alliance ...
Well this being the C&P forum (not the carebear forum), my hope is a proven hisec pew lord or criminal who understands the more combative side of hisec would one day get a seat at the CSM table, to counter the road to nerfdom CCP has been pursuing.
When I see the CSM always stacked with null folks, those claiming a vibrant hisec pew community doesnt exist (to drive more numbers to the losec/null wastelands) and rumblings of making hisec wardecs consensual only, I get very concerned things are going to get worse for hisec pew without such representation.
In short, C&P needs a candidate who will enhance the wardec mechanics as job #1, not make them consensual only. C&P needs a candidate that will sack-up and poke CCP in the eye on these constant hisec nerfs. C&P needs a candidate with a strong enough voice to shout over the herd of nullsec CSM's (who I fear would love nothing more than for hisec pew to die entirely, to drive more pew oriented players into their clutches in low/null...)
This candidate isn't me, I'm on the same page as Kane, but it sure as fracking frak isn't an indy/carebear type who will frak up hisec further.
Who will stand for C&P and hisec pew? Who will get wardec fees put into a bucket claimable by the defender vs. ships killed to inspire them to come out and fight? Who will get NPC corp taxes raised to 50-60% to incentivize those hiding out there forever to join player corps? Who will call for 1 week stasis period on leaving a player corp with any active (or pending) wars? Who will call for a 15 minute "Do you wish to remain logged in?" popup timer, when a player doesn't move their mouse for 15 minutes or be auto-logged-off? (i.e. AFK in station or AFK cloaked in space just to be a d!ck)
Do it for fairness, do it for justice but above all...do it for the children! Would you like to know more? |

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
303
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 15:58:00 -
[33] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:Zeus Maximo wrote: ... However mercs are actually quite rare in high sec. You would probably get more votes if you related to Ivy League/Incursion runners/Industrial alliance ...
Well this being the C&P forum (not the carebear forum), my hope is a proven hisec pew lord or criminal who understands the more combative side of hisec would one day get a seat at the CSM table, to counter the road to nerfdom CCP has been pursuing. When I see the CSM always stacked with null folks, those claiming a vibrant hisec pew community doesnt exist (to drive more numbers to the losec/null wastelands) and rumblings of making hisec wardecs consensual only, I get very concerned things are going to get worse for hisec pew without such representation. In short, C&P needs a candidate who will enhance the wardec mechanics as job #1, not make them consensual only. C&P needs a candidate that will sack-up and poke CCP in the eye on these constant hisec nerfs. C&P needs a candidate with a strong enough voice to shout over the herd of nullsec CSM's (who I fear would love nothing more than for hisec pew to die entirely, to drive more pew oriented players into their clutches in low/null...) This candidate isn't me, I'm on the same page as Kane, but it sure as fracking frak isn't an indy/carebear type who will frak up hisec further. Who will stand for C&P and hisec pew? Who will get wardec fees put into a bucket claimable by the defender vs. ships killed to inspire them to come out and fight? Who will get NPC corp taxes raised to 50-60% to incentivize those hiding out there forever to join player corps? Who will call for 1 week stasis period on leaving a player corp with any active (or pending) wars? Who will call for a 15 minute "Do you wish to remain logged in?" popup timer, when a player doesn't move their mouse for 15 minutes or be auto-logged-off? (i.e. AFK in station or cloaked in space just to be a d!ck) Do it for fairness, do it for justice but above all...do it for the children!
Why not you? You seem to have all the ideas down.... Killboard
https://zkillboard.com/character/90841161/ |

Saeger1737
Pod Repo Path of Destruction.
473
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 17:59:00 -
[34] - Quote
Why failed diplomacy, they never leave Rens, so how can you be considered anything other then a station baiter? You can't represent someone if your not that type of person. Seems to me you have ulterior motives to do this. |

Michele Bachmann
Failed Diplomacy
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 18:06:00 -
[35] - Quote
Saeger1737 wrote:Why failed diplomacy, they never leave Rens, so how can you be considered anything other then a station baiter? You can't represent someone if your not that type of person. Seems to me you have ulterior motives to do this.
I've never claimed anything about my pvp other than that I pvp in hisec a lot and am very distraught over how unfair it really is. You can check my kb as I've been all over and still go all over. Station games are fun to a point but nothing beats roams and hunting war targets.
and honestly no ulterior motives. If I wanted to win a csm spot i'd be advocating for Ivy league or RvB or some carebear incursion group. I'd like to be the voice for the people of C&P, a group sorely underrepresented in the CSM and just EVE in general.
|

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
304
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 18:10:00 -
[36] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote: .....Station games are fun to a point....
No, they are not. Killboard
https://zkillboard.com/character/90841161/ |

Saeger1737
Pod Repo Path of Destruction.
474
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 18:22:00 -
[37] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote:Saeger1737 wrote:Why failed diplomacy, they never leave Rens, so how can you be considered anything other then a station baiter? You can't represent someone if your not that type of person. Seems to me you have ulterior motives to do this. I've never claimed anything about my pvp other than that I pvp in hisec a lot and am very distraught over how unfair it really is. You can check my kb as I've been all over and still go all over. Station games are fun to a point but nothing beats roams and hunting war targets. and honestly no ulterior motives. If I wanted to win a csm spot i'd be advocating for Ivy league or RvB or some carebear incursion group. I'd like to be the voice for the people of C&P, a group sorely underrepresented in the CSM and just EVE in general. So have you've ever set up merc contracts before, or Ganked freighters? Have you've swapped you safety off the green setting yet? If you haven't done any of these, you shouldn't run to represent it. I don't think you understand anyone in C&P or the things they do.
-1 for being a station baiting bear. |

Michele Bachmann
Failed Diplomacy
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 18:23:00 -
[38] - Quote
Saeger1737 wrote:Michele Bachmann wrote:Saeger1737 wrote:Why failed diplomacy, they never leave Rens, so how can you be considered anything other then a station baiter? You can't represent someone if your not that type of person. Seems to me you have ulterior motives to do this. I've never claimed anything about my pvp other than that I pvp in hisec a lot and am very distraught over how unfair it really is. You can check my kb as I've been all over and still go all over. Station games are fun to a point but nothing beats roams and hunting war targets. and honestly no ulterior motives. If I wanted to win a csm spot i'd be advocating for Ivy league or RvB or some carebear incursion group. I'd like to be the voice for the people of C&P, a group sorely underrepresented in the CSM and just EVE in general. So have you've ever set up merc contracts before, or Ganked freighters? Have you've swapped you safety off the green setting yet? If you haven't done any of these, you shouldn't run to represent it. I don't think you understand anyone in C&P or the things they do. -1 for being a station baiting bear.
yes i have, you can ask my ceo he backs me 100% |

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
304
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 18:35:00 -
[39] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote: yes i have, you can ask my ceo he backs me 100%
lol... Killboard
https://zkillboard.com/character/90841161/ |

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
1404
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:09:00 -
[40] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote: I know what I've going against me, but I have to try if not for myself then for the people I fly with
This is a joke right? Tell me this whole thread is a joke. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Michele Bachmann
Failed Diplomacy
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:11:00 -
[41] - Quote
Batelle wrote:Michele Bachmann wrote: I know what I've going against me, but I have to try if not for myself then for the people I fly with
This is a joke right? Tell me this whole thread is a joke.
No this is not a joke.
Why wouldn't the people from C&P want a potential CSM candidate to represent them? |

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
84
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:13:00 -
[42] - Quote
Here's the work around for folks that hang in NPC corps.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=21412391
Yeah yeah I know, he's not in an NPC corp. Just showing you the work around, so that part of your platform is fixed (you're welcome). |

Michele Bachmann
Failed Diplomacy
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:15:00 -
[43] - Quote
not acceptable by me or a lot of people |

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
84
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:17:00 -
[44] - Quote
So you're against ganking??? Or am I too old to understand the meaning of unacceptable? |

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
304
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:21:00 -
[45] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote:Batelle wrote:Michele Bachmann wrote: I know what I've going against me, but I have to try if not for myself then for the people I fly with
This is a joke right? Tell me this whole thread is a joke. No this is not a joke. Why wouldn't the people from C&P want a potential CSM candidate to represent them?
The people of C&P want a fellow C&P'er to represent them, if anything. I dont personally know of you, but im pretty sure you arent a content creator like the other names mentioned in this thread.
If I was to cast a vote for a C&P based CSM, it would be for a well known name such as Monk or Adriel... people who live the life so to speak. Killboard
https://zkillboard.com/character/90841161/ |

Amrastion Tasartir
Hook In Mouth xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:22:00 -
[46] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:So you're against ganking??? Or am I too old to understand the meaning of unacceptable?
You are just too old, thx |

Michele Bachmann
Failed Diplomacy
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:23:00 -
[47] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:So you're against ganking??? Or am I too old to understand the meaning of unacceptable?
i'm not against ganking,
If I want to gank I know I can, if I want to wardec I can't. That's the discrepancy I see with the 'work around' |

Saeger1737
Pod Repo Path of Destruction.
474
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:25:00 -
[48] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote:Batelle wrote:Michele Bachmann wrote: I know what I've going against me, but I have to try if not for myself then for the people I fly with
This is a joke right? Tell me this whole thread is a joke. No this is not a joke. Why wouldn't the people from C&P want a potential CSM candidate to represent them?
Because your a C&P nobody, we want someone who's been around with a well known name, not some noob station hugger. |

Amrastion Tasartir
Hook In Mouth xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:26:00 -
[49] - Quote
Saeger1737 wrote:Michele Bachmann wrote:Batelle wrote:Michele Bachmann wrote: I know what I've going against me, but I have to try if not for myself then for the people I fly with
This is a joke right? Tell me this whole thread is a joke. No this is not a joke. Why wouldn't the people from C&P want a potential CSM candidate to represent them? Because your a C&P nobody, we want someone who's been around with a well known name, not some noob station hugger.
man station huggers sounds so vile and crude, can there not be a better term? |

Michele Bachmann
Failed Diplomacy
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:28:00 -
[50] - Quote
Saeger1737 wrote:Michele Bachmann wrote:Batelle wrote:Michele Bachmann wrote: I know what I've going against me, but I have to try if not for myself then for the people I fly with
This is a joke right? Tell me this whole thread is a joke. No this is not a joke. Why wouldn't the people from C&P want a potential CSM candidate to represent them? Because your a C&P nobody, we want someone who's been around with a well known name, not some noob station hugger.
\o/ yay for popularity contests.
I'm sure Psychotic will throw his hat in and I'll probably vote for him but I suppose until that happens I'm all you've got.
At least this thread crystallizes what C&Pers want in a CSM rep |

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
84
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:29:00 -
[51] - Quote
The CSM boat has sailed and you're not on it. Not the shortest run ever - but you were close. |

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
305
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:36:00 -
[52] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote:
\o/ yay for popularity contests.
I'm sure Psychotic will throw his hat in and I'll probably vote for him but I suppose until that happens I'm all you've got.
At least this thread crystallizes what C&Pers want in a CSM rep
Its not a popularity contest. Its about being an active member of the community, and being active has the byproduct of being well known. You, however, have not established any solid reputation, and therefore no confidence from the community. Killboard
https://zkillboard.com/character/90841161/ |

Michele Bachmann
Failed Diplomacy
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:39:00 -
[53] - Quote
Leto Thule wrote:Michele Bachmann wrote:
\o/ yay for popularity contests.
I'm sure Psychotic will throw his hat in and I'll probably vote for him but I suppose until that happens I'm all you've got.
At least this thread crystallizes what C&Pers want in a CSM rep
Its not a popularity contest. Its about being an active member of the community, and being active has the byproduct of being well known. You, however, have not established any solid reputation, and therefore no confidence from the community.
Wow maybe what you just said was the whole purpose of me making this thread |

Saeger1737
Pod Repo Path of Destruction.
474
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:44:00 -
[54] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote:Leto Thule wrote:Michele Bachmann wrote:
\o/ yay for popularity contests.
I'm sure Psychotic will throw his hat in and I'll probably vote for him but I suppose until that happens I'm all you've got.
At least this thread crystallizes what C&Pers want in a CSM rep
Its not a popularity contest. Its about being an active member of the community, and being active has the byproduct of being well known. You, however, have not established any solid reputation, and therefore no confidence from the community. Wow maybe what you just said was the whole purpose of me making this thread
Then your stance is aimed to get famous, see ulterior motives like I said, your not worth the time nor the effort of a vote. Appearantly you have no idea what Thule is saying. To be a C&P leader you have to be known for your crime or your addiction to destruction, not some wannabe with a forum post. |

Michele Bachmann
Failed Diplomacy
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:47:00 -
[55] - Quote
Saeger1737 wrote:Michele Bachmann wrote:Leto Thule wrote:Michele Bachmann wrote:
\o/ yay for popularity contests.
I'm sure Psychotic will throw his hat in and I'll probably vote for him but I suppose until that happens I'm all you've got.
At least this thread crystallizes what C&Pers want in a CSM rep
Its not a popularity contest. Its about being an active member of the community, and being active has the byproduct of being well known. You, however, have not established any solid reputation, and therefore no confidence from the community. Wow maybe what you just said was the whole purpose of me making this thread Then your stance is aimed to get famous, see ulterior motives like I said, your not worth the time nor the effort of a vote. Appearantly you have no idea what Thule is saying. To be a C&P leader you have to be known for your crime or your addiction to destruction, not some wannabe with a forum post.
lol get real, you clearly don't care about the ideas i've presented or participating in a discussion and apparently I have to be famous or as you put it 'be known'
I made this thread to be known. Politics doesn't happen in a closet by myself. |

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
305
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 19:58:00 -
[56] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote:
lol get real, you clearly don't care about the ideas i've presented or participating in a discussion and apparently I have to be famous or as you put it 'be known'
I made this thread to be known. Politics doesn't happen in a closet by myself.
The point here is that the ideas are not yours. They arent news to anyone here. If you want to participate, by all means do so, but dont try to start out your involvement in C&P by championing your rise to the top.
YES, you have to be known to matter in this case. How are we to know your not a carebear in disguise? How do we know your not a nullbunny alt? Anyone who votes for a candidate they know nothing about simply shouldnt vote. Killboard
https://zkillboard.com/character/90841161/ |

Michele Bachmann
Failed Diplomacy
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 20:07:00 -
[57] - Quote
Leto Thule wrote:
The point here is that the ideas are not yours. They arent news to anyone here. If you want to participate, by all means do so, but dont try to start out your involvement in C&P by championing your rise to the top.
YES, you have to be known to matter in this case. How are we to know your not a carebear in disguise? How do we know your not a nullbunny alt? Anyone who votes for a candidate they know nothing about simply shouldnt vote.
I would argue that most of the ideas that CSM reps give to CCP are not their own as they are representatives of a community. |

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
84
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 20:11:00 -
[58] - Quote
She is a carebear but she is not in disguise.
"Not acceptable to me or a lot of other people"
This is not the C&P outlook on ganking. This is the thinly veiled agenda of a HS war dec player who hates on NPC bears because she can not pluck them with impunity. The more I think about this the more disgusted I get.
Representative of the people - HA
More like judge and jury with preconceived opinions. pfffft |

Donovan Draknevov
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
50
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 22:21:00 -
[59] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote: lol get real, you clearly don't care about the ideas i've presented or participating in a discussion and apparently I have to be famous or as you put it 'be known'
I made this thread to be known. Politics doesn't happen in a closet by myself.
There have only been two topics you've been involved in that have anything relating to your ideas: This one, and one in the Features and Ideas discussion forum, here. Other than that, you've created one topic to create a WH Corp, and everything else has been in the Timecode Bazaar. You have yet to properly flesh out your platform. I could do the same thing, and say that my platform is Free Cheese Sandwiches for all Capsuleers, but until I state how I plan on making that happen, and flesh out the whos and whys, it's not much of a platform. Everyone has ideas, but you need the ability to follow up and make them a true representation of the needs of the many, and the ability to get the community behind you. My honest recommendation would be to skip this election, and build a name for you here in the forums (Or in any forum, honestly, but become a name people know) and a name for yourself in the game as well. They will know you by your deeds in the game, and will be able to make a more informed decision. Right now, electing you is a crap-shoot. You could be the glorious savior of C&P (Bringing ruin to all others who don't like the pew) or you could be someone who joins up, and then we don't hear anything about you until the next election.
One thread does not the candidate make. Prove to the people you're worth electing to support them in a community-driven game, and they'll elect you. Right now, all you have are short-thoughts. Flesh them out and put proven experience behind it, and you should be on a better track. Trust in the Rust |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4450
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 23:48:00 -
[60] - Quote
Michele Bachmann wrote:lol get real, you clearly don't care about the ideas i've presented or participating in a discussion and apparently I have to be famous or as you put it 'be known'
I made this thread to be known. Politics doesn't happen in a closet by myself.
We don't care because your ideas & platform are garbage & not thought out at all. Also nobody knows you. Why should people vote for an unproved nobody to represent them? This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |