EVE Search - [G] official Statement

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

[G] official Statement

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
alty mcaltalot	Posted - 2006.04.07 23:17:00 - [1] Congratulations CCP - by setting the skill requirements for capital ships so high only the alliances with the most amount of vets can effectivly play in 0.0. As CCP's own data farming showed, the average player only plays for 7 months or so. Learning Skills: 2 months Large Turrets 5: 1 month Advanced Weapon Upgrades 5: 1 month Battleship 5: 1.5 months Advanced Spaceship Command: 1 month That's 6.5 and a half months training right there. Territorial warfare has gone from who can spam a system with the most small POS to who can suck up the most vets and bring the most dreadnoughts.
alty mcaltalot	Posted - 2006.04.07 23:21:00 - [2] Originally by: vladdy2 Originally by: alty mcaltalot Congratulations CCP - by setting the skill requirements for capital ships so high only the alliances with the most amount of vets can effectivly play in 0.0. As CCP's own data farming showed, the average player only plays for 7 months or so. Learning Skills: 2 months Large Turrets 5: 1 month Advanced Weapon Upgrades 5: 1 month Battleship 5: 1.5 months Advanced Spaceship Command: 1 month That's 6.5 and a half months training right there. Territorial warfare has gone from who can spam a system with the most small POS to who can suck up the most vets and bring the most dreadnoughts. so what.... you want it to be the one that can bring the most Alt/n00bs to the system? no, I am simply stating that the current system sucks just as much as the old one.
alty mcaltalot	Posted - 2006.04.07 23:29:00 - [3] Originally by: vladdy2 Originally by: alty mcaltalot Originally by: vladdy2 Originally by: alty mcaltalot Congratulations CCP - by setting the skill requirements for capital ships so high only the alliances with the most amount of vets can effectivly play in 0.0. As CCP's own data farming showed, the average player only plays for 7 months or so. Learning Skills: 2 months Large Turrets 5: 1 month Advanced Weapon Upgrades 5: 1 month Battleship 5: 1.5 months Advanced Spaceship Command: 1 month That's 6.5 and a half months training right there. Territorial warfare has gone from who can spam a system with the most small POS to who can suck up the most vets and bring the most dreadnoughts. so what.... you want it to be the one that can bring the most Alt/n00bs to the system? no, I am simply stating that the current system sucks just as much as the old one. yeh i know, its friday, its a whacko day in Eve, Im at work, i felt like being a smart***. tbh Dread/Cap ships are "end Game" items not "mid Game" items or sum such. Makes sense to me as it fits with EvE whole way of progression in game. Until then attack them in Ibis' in which case, ccp has one again shot themselves in the foot with their plan to get more people into 0.0. why should people invest so much time and isk into building a new empire when the defence of it relies on who can recruit the most vets?
alty mcaltalot	Posted - 2006.04.07 23:38:00 - [4] Originally by: Vince Draken Originally by: alty mcaltalot Congratulations CCP - by setting the skill requirements for capital ships so high only the alliances with the most amount of vets can effectivly play in 0.0. As CCP's own data farming showed, the average player only plays for 7 months or so. Learning Skills: 2 months Large Turrets 5: 1 month Advanced Weapon Upgrades 5: 1 month Battleship 5: 1.5 months Advanced Spaceship Command: 1 month That's 6.5 and a half months training right there. Territorial warfare has gone from who can spam a system with the most small POS to who can suck up the most vets and bring the most dreadnoughts. 1: Get some better attributes 2: Failing to do that get a load of GTC's 3: Buy a vet that had to quit eve Some of us have been playing from the start, thats 2 years 11 months. That is $525 is subscription fee's, hours of effort and roughly a billion isk in skills. Your point? With good attributes you can probably knock 5 days off those skills. The problem isn't the vets, it's the skill requirements and mechanics of 0.0 territory control.
alty mcaltalot	Posted - 2006.04.07 23:40:00 - [5] Originally by: pershphanie Originally by: Cmd Woodlouse G Alliance disbands Move along. And no this is no joke. I dont believe you. Whats the catch? if bob goes north, you're first
alty mcaltalot	Posted - 2006.04.09 19:38:00 - [6] Originally by: Kinsy <3 Woody. Shocking... someone hasn't seen the other thread on the front page yet :)

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.