EVE Search - [War Results] Rage of Angels

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

[War Results] Rage of Angels

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Soul Raven	Posted - 2006.04.09 19:09:00 - [1] ------------------------------------------ R.O.A vs Xelas Alliance Kill Report \| ------------------------------------------ Kills: 86 -------------- Assault Frigate: 1 Battleship: 3 (faction BS: 1- Machariel) Battlecruiser: 1 Capsule: 30 Cruiser: 6 (faction cruiser: 1 - Vigilant) Covert Ops: 1 Destroyer: 1 Frigate: 20 Interceptor: 2 Industrial: 8 Mining Barge: 1 Shuttle: 12 Losses: 1! ------------ Cruiser: 1 (Vigilant) Was a very difficult war in the respect of finding targets. Xelas did a very good job in shutting up shop and stopping us from getting easy targets so hats off to you for that. There is still an option open to the employer to extend this beyond 1 week. So see you in space ladies and gents Soul Raven Rage of Angels
alty mcaltalot	Posted - 2006.04.09 19:10:00 - [2] lol @ the losses good job
Vegas	Posted - 2006.04.09 19:14:00 - [3] Originally by: alty mcaltalot lol @ the losses good job It was me the only loss. But in my defence it was the Machariel that killed me ----------------------------------------------- Rage of Angels Killboard
NAFnist	Posted - 2006.04.09 19:16:00 - [4] We had too look long and hard for targets during this contract.
Raid	Posted - 2006.04.09 20:12:00 - [5] Hmm nice job.. Like how you pointed out the Vigilant as a "faction cruiser" in the kills but not in the losses. Originally by: Bared Bel'Medar Its a rare dialect called "dou'chay'ba'gh"... frequently used by members of this forum community. I was under the assumption you spoke it
NAFnist	Posted - 2006.04.09 20:15:00 - [6] Originally by: Raid Hmm nice job.. Like how you pointed out the Vigilant as a "faction cruiser" in the kills but not in the losses. it does state Vigilant in the losses, so it doesnt exactly take a masters degree to figure out
alty mcaltalot	Posted - 2006.04.09 20:15:00 - [7] Originally by: Raid Hmm nice job.. Like how you pointed out the Vigilant as a "faction cruiser" in the kills but not in the losses. probably because it's been established that it's a faction cruiser?
Hellraiza666	Posted - 2006.04.09 21:41:00 - [8] hmmm, is 86 : 1 better ratio than burn eden ?
Rule2k	Posted - 2006.04.09 22:09:00 - [9] pld ROA
Jarek Naumen	Posted - 2006.04.09 22:13:00 - [10] Originally by: Raid Hmm nice job.. Like how you pointed out the Vigilant as a "faction cruiser" in the kills but not in the losses. Should've left it Cruiser: 1 in order to be more accurate . But i added the ship's name in brackets exactly for the sole purpose to hide the fact that it was a faction cruiser. ROA Forums
Masta Killa	Posted - 2006.04.09 22:19:00 - [11] Originally by: Hellraiza666 hmmm, is 86 : 1 better ratio than burn eden ? The good guys have 130-150 kills per 1 death and the noob (me) has 35-40 per 1 death. --------------------------------------
DUFFMANX	Posted - 2006.04.09 23:09:00 - [12] Originally by: Masta Killa Originally by: Hellraiza666 hmmm, is 86 : 1 better ratio than burn eden ? The good guys have 130-150 Forum Posts per 1 Thread and the noob (me) has 35-40 Forum Posts 1 Thread. That should be more accurate
munchy	Posted - 2006.04.09 23:13:00 - [13] Originally by: DUFFMANX Originally by: Masta Killa Originally by: Hellraiza666 hmmm, is 86 : 1 better ratio than burn eden ? The good guys have 130-150 Forum Posts per 1 Thread and the noob (me) has 35-40 Forum Posts 1 Thread. That should be more accurate QFT ---
Remedial	Posted - 2006.04.10 01:34:00 - [14] You know, not to deflate anyone's parade, but 60 something of those kills were pods, shuttles or frigates. I'm not saying you guys didn't do well, I just don't understand why people count kills like having a 10:1 ratio is the be-all, end-all of PvP when you can lose a T2 fitted BS worth 100M and have that be the "1", or 10 crappy T1 frigs as the "10".
alty mcaltalot	Posted - 2006.04.10 01:52:00 - [15] Originally by: Remedial You know, not to deflate anyone's parade, but 60 something of those kills were pods, shuttles or frigates. I'm not saying you guys didn't do well, I just don't understand why people count kills like having a 10:1 ratio is the be-all, end-all of PvP when you can lose a T2 fitted BS worth 100M and have that be the "1", or 10 crappy T1 frigs as the "10". if you had been reading the various comments dotted around this forum on the contract, xelas pretty much docked the moment a single hostile entered the system. it's a bit hard to get kills when your target keeps running :)
Enfoe	Posted - 2006.04.10 05:56:00 - [16] Originally by: Remedial You know, not to deflate anyone's parade, but 60 something of those kills were pods, shuttles or frigates. I'm not saying you guys didn't do well, I just don't understand why people count kills like having a 10:1 ratio is the be-all, end-all of PvP when you can lose a T2 fitted BS worth 100M and have that be the "1", or 10 crappy T1 frigs as the "10". This is true. However often times you can not control what enemy targets you come across. It'd be cool if you could force your enemies to undock in the ships of your choosing, it just doesnt work that way. Anyways it'd be hard to argue that ROA didnt exceed all expectations in their first contract. Looks like eve may have a new top tier merc corp. Who ever hired them really got their isks worth here.
Killow	Posted - 2006.04.10 06:30:00 - [17] Hmm thanks for the good words Persh...
KOTH Fluf	Posted - 2006.04.10 07:08:00 - [18] Good job guys. Unfortunately I could have told you that your wouldnt catch more than frigs. ROA has always been a class act. Miss you guys. Fluf CEO Shiva Vertigo Coalition
Markie	Posted - 2006.04.10 09:54:00 - [19] if I lost my POD I would loose over 700 mil, thats a lot of BS. ROA Forums Mercs For Hire --> Join ROA Here <--
liquidism	Posted - 2006.04.10 10:12:00 - [20] n1
Lubomir Penev	Posted - 2006.04.10 10:53:00 - [21] Originally by: Soul Raven Losses: 1! ------------ Cruiser: 1 (Vigilant) What about counting the losses you got to Huffe Technologies in Udianor? As Udianor is one of the chokepoint between empire and Fountain it is my opinion you tried to set up camp there and ergo that those losses are war related. So I'd add : Battlecruiser: 1 (Ferox) Battleship: 1 (Dominix) Cruiser: 1 (Moa) Pod: 1 Also when tailed, heading to a known gatecamp is IMHO a valid tactic. Pirates can serve a valid purpose after all... Relevant links: Pod Ferox Dominix Moa
RichThugster	Posted - 2006.04.10 11:01:00 - [22] Originally by: Remedial end-all of PvP when you can lose a T2 fitted BS worth 100M and have that be the "1", or 10 crappy T1 frigs as the "10". well if the player with the t2 BS dies and looses 100mil, often they have more than a few hundred mil to replace it. with the "crappy" t1 frigs, they are flying it because A)they cant afford better, B)dont have skills to fly better, C)Cant afford to loose a 100mil isk BS. it comes down to the base arguement in the goonies thread. "goonies killed 80% of so and so, whilst loosing just 5% of their players." sure goons loose more, but as a percentage its nothing. to alot of ppl flying t2 BS, 100mil is nothing as a percentage of their wealth. Compared to the player in the frig, the 500k (ship+fittings) they loose is a lot of isk, or by loosing that ship it avoids them loosing something like their t2 BS, which they cant afford to loose.
Jarek Naumen	Posted - 2006.04.10 12:22:00 - [23] Originally by: Lubomir Penev Edited by: Lubomir Penev on 10/04/2006 11:35:20 Edited by: Lubomir Penev on 10/04/2006 11:34:51 Originally by: Soul Raven Losses: 1! ------------ Cruiser: 1 (Vigilant) What about counting the losses you got to Huff Technologies in Udianor? As Udianor is one of the chokepoint between empire and Fountain it is my opinion you tried to set up camp there and ergo that those losses are war related. So I'd add : Battlecruiser: 1 (Ferox) Battleship: 1 (Dominix) Cruiser: 1 (Moa) Pod: 1 Also when tailed, heading to a known gatecamp is IMHO a valid tactic. Pirates can serve a valid purpose after all... Relevant links: Pod Ferox Dominix Moa Well as you have said as well those have not been lost to Xelas. And we "tried" to set up camp there? If we wanted to setup camp there we would've set it up...period. That Dominix was mine and i just went through there at the wrong time. Also those losses are posted on our killboard for reference: Dominix Moa Ferox ROA Forums
NAFnist	Posted - 2006.04.10 12:58:00 - [24] Originally by: Lubomir Penev What about counting the losses you got to Huff Technologies in Udianor? Should we also count the kills made by us of random factions everywhere around the universe stating 'It was on the route to killing Xelas, ergo relevant to the war' Doesnt make sence now, does it
Lubomir Penev	Posted - 2006.04.10 13:58:00 - [25] Originally by: Jarek Naumen Well as you have said as well those have not been lost to Xelas. And we "tried" to set up camp there? If we wanted to setup camp there we would've set it up...period. That Dominix was mine and i just went through there at the wrong time. My point was that you being there was directly war related. It was nothing random. I got shot at by an Eagle Thursday, had I not been able to flee, I was headed to Ostingele really hoping to jump in a SNIGG camp. You can call me crazy :-) Originally by: Jarek Naumen Also those losses are posted on our killboard for reference: I certainly did not wanted to imply they were not, it's just I don't find searching on your site very convenient.
Tetovo	Posted - 2006.04.10 14:18:00 - [26] Originally by: Lubomir Penev Edited by: Lubomir Penev on 10/04/2006 11:35:20 Edited by: Lubomir Penev on 10/04/2006 11:34:51 Originally by: Soul Raven Losses: 1! ------------ Cruiser: 1 (Vigilant) What about counting the losses you got to Huff Technologies in Udianor? As Udianor is one of the chokepoint between empire and Fountain it is my opinion you tried to set up camp there and ergo that those losses are war related. So I'd add : Battlecruiser: 1 (Ferox) Battleship: 1 (Dominix) Cruiser: 1 (Moa) Pod: 1 Also when tailed, heading to a known gatecamp is IMHO a valid tactic. Pirates can serve a valid purpose after all... Relevant links: Pod Ferox Dominix Moa Hey I fought an ROA gatecamp too!!! Can my kills be counted in the xelas contract even though they happened halfway across eve!!111111eleven
Orree	Posted - 2006.04.10 15:42:00 - [27] Originally by: Lubomir Penev Edited by: Lubomir Penev on 10/04/2006 14:08:48 Originally by: Jarek Naumen Well as you have said as well those have not been lost to Xelas. And we "tried" to set up camp there? If we wanted to setup camp there we would've set it up...period. That Dominix was mine and i just went through there at the wrong time. My point was that you being there was directly war related. It was nothing random. I got shot at by an Eagle Thursday, had I not been able to flee, I was headed to Ostingele really hoping to jump in a SNIGG camp. You can call me crazy :-) Originally by: Jarek Naumen Also those losses are posted on our killboard for reference: I certainly did not want to imply they were not, it's just I don't find searching on your site very convenient. Holy stretches in logic, Batman!
Maling	Posted - 2006.04.10 16:22:00 - [28] dont forget that many of the kills that you guys mad were of abandoned shuttles and frigs inspace because they were players who have not logged on for over 3 months, so about 40 of your kills shouldnt be counted, and in regards to a pod with implants if you in 0.0 yuor a noob if you fly with ur implants in. get a jump clone
NAFnist	Posted - 2006.04.10 16:44:00 - [29] Originally by: Maling and in regards to a pod with implants if you in 0.0 yuor a noob if you fly with ur implants in. get a jump clone Well.. it was an empire war We only took a gang to Fountain for a day or two.
Jarek Naumen	Posted - 2006.04.10 17:18:00 - [30] Edited by: Jarek Naumen on 10/04/2006 17:18:43 whhoops i meant edit not quote ROA Recruitment Mercs 4tw :)

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.