| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific
Initiative Mercenaries
4816
   |
Posted - 2014.02.17 18:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
No not at all! I just spent 3 days in Iceland and all we did was throw nullsec puppies and kittens into the sharkpool and drink cognac and nulltear cocktails. Hahaha I've secretly been anti-0.0 the whole time!
I don't always drink null tears, but when i do, it's Dos Equis.
|
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific
Initiative Mercenaries
5119
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 20:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:CCP finally overhauls the moon mining system removing the passive income generators ability to fund Coalitions SRP funds forcing players to actually use the space they hold to make ISK.
- This is achieved by switching the Highend moon minerals from Null Sec and LE Moon minerals from Low Sec
- In addition to this CCP will swap highend Roids and lowsec mid range roids.
Recognizing the clear imbalance in LP generation in Low Sec CCP seeds pirate faction stations throughout Low Sec in fringe regions of Null Sec.
- Allowing Low Sec alliances and players to generate Pirate Faction LP instead of Empire Faction LP.
None of which makes any sense at all. If people want pirate faction LP (other than SOE) they should go to pirate space. Low Sec is Empire space thus empire LP.
Low sec already has the best LP generating missions (lvl 5s) as well as some of the most valuable LP (faction warfare and the low sec sisters of EVE agents) in addition to the best exploration (5-6/10s that can drop things like pithum/gistum invuls and medium shield boosters, which is usually better isk wise than the stuff you can get from 7/10s on up) and unique content like Clone Tag dropping ships and several farmable high in Cosmos plexes.
None of us complain about the unbalanced nature iof low sec rewards because low sec is dangerous unlike high sec, but buffing low sec rewards is insane because any good PVEr can already make a mint there.
There is no place in high sec, low sec or wormholes where you can make 100 mil an hour with a frigate with warp core stabs. PVE wise low sec is fine. |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific
Initiative Mercenaries
5125
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 23:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:
See all I hear is don't take our passive income away CCP. We need moongoo so we don't have to PVE!
There is that prejudice again. Because Im in a null allaince you think I have something to do with passive income. I do not, I only rarely pvp so i don't get reimbursed for anyhting (for example). I don't care what CCP does with moon goo good or bad, it doesn't affect me.
Quote:
Low Sec doesn't offer anything to the pirate group. Moon minerals being of Highest Value would give them something to fight over other than "for the hell of it" It provides a gaping bridge between FW PVP and Nullsec combat.
This again demonstrates you don't understand people. Pirates aren't going to up and stop pirating to challenge null sec colaitions that are thousands of times bigger for moon goo or anything else. Again, there is no magic wall keeping null sec groups out of low sec.
All that would happen were CCP to do as you suggest is switch which systems CCP has to reinforce beause of blobbing.
Quote:
What is one good reason that Null Sec should retain the highest value moons or minerals?
Because it's the most dangerous space by volume (wormhole space is the most dangerous per capita). While low sec doesn't have much npc protection, it has some (gate guns, station guns, sec loss for shooting people).
The proper rewards progession in EVE is high sec (because of CONCORD), low sec (some automated protection), Null sec (no protection save what peopel do for themselves), Wormholes (no protection AND no local). Again, many of us accept the rewards inbalance in low sec (such as low having DED plexes that drop better stuff than the higher rated DED plexes of null) because at least there is risk in low, but low has more than enoguh rewards for organized groups already. Thats why TEST went to faction warfare and Goons and co used to lock down low sec incursion consellations. |
| |
|