| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sadayiel
   |
Posted - 2006.04.11 08:31:00 -
[1]
after read lots and lots of post about deimos and thorax , this weird idea came to my mind not sure if someone tought on it before.
How the thorax, deimos may work with instead the 5% to less cap reduction from mwd it got some % to reduce powergrid needs in blasters...
okay it need to aproach enemy, but the fact comes that the good thing of those ships it¦s a big dmg at extreme close range, not a big speed to reach extreme close range...
Feel free to add any idea,suggestion
-------------------Sig-----------------------
S.S.E. currently recruiting new players.
Convo me or leave an eve-mail.
Suicide it's man way to tell God. You can't fire me so I quit. |
Asurix
|
Posted - 2006.04.11 09:51:00 -
[2]
I definetly don't agree as you need to get into close range as fast as possible and I'd like to have some cap left right there =)
|
Sluggers
|
Posted - 2006.04.11 10:05:00 -
[3]
Yes i guess it would be good. But hey, all ships cant be nber and are not ment to be either. Ever heard of balance? Giving them -% pg needs on blasters would give them a significant buff, thus making them un-balanced compared to other ships in the same class.
|
Harper04
|
Posted - 2006.04.11 23:28:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Sluggers
Yes i guess it would be good. But hey, all ships cant be nber and are not ment to be either. Ever heard of balance? Giving them -% pg needs on blasters would give them a significant buff, thus making them un-balanced compared to other ships in the same class.
Sorry, but you must not fly deimos' or thorax's much. This is a terrible idea, because one of the biggest problems currently is cap usage, and this would gimp your cap even more by taking away that bonus. Blasters fittings are being fixed somewhat through the blaster boost that's coming up anyways.
|
Franky B
|
Posted - 2006.04.11 23:30:00 -
[5]
dont get rid of the MWD bonus.
for gods sake please dont.
|
lofty29
|
Posted - 2006.04.11 23:34:00 -
[6]
just give it a say, 10 to 20% boost to cpu + pg. That would pretty much fix it
---------------------------
Originally by: Oveur
I see boobies! \o/
|
Hllaxiu
|
Posted - 2006.04.11 23:36:00 -
[7]
The deimos would not be able to maintain its own blasters if that MWD bonus was removed...
---
Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail. - Emerson |
Malthros Zenobia
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 02:32:00 -
[8]
Originally by: lofty29
just give it a say, 10 to 20% boost to cpu + pg. That would pretty much fix it
Does the moa have an easier time fitting a full rack of t2 250s and heavies?
I don't think a t1 cruiser should beable to jjust slap on 5 neutron IIs without some sort of gimp, in this case, it's the rest of the setup.
The deimos MAYBE, but I'd also like to see it be possible to fit a good setup for the harpy using 4x 150mm T2s and a T2 launcher.
Originally by: Dark Shikari
Istvaan Shogaatsu's ego, when combined with a veldspar asteroid, would create 500 titans. Too bad he's never mined.
RAWR!11 Sig Hijack!11 - Imaran |
Karl Shade
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 02:39:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Karl Shade on 12/04/2006 02:39:31
Originally by: Malthros Zenobia
The deimos MAYBE, but I'd also like to see it be possible to fit a good setup for the harpy using 4x 150mm T2s and a T2 launcher.
What does the harpy have to do with the Deimos?
To the OP. No. This would make the Rax a gallente Moa. Completely defeating it¦s purpose as a closerange damagedealer.
-
|
Ikusa
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 02:48:00 -
[10]
Personaly i wouldnt mind alil more power and pcu added to the rax but the MWD is must on it. and for the love of god buff the brutixes speed!
Live isnt fair... Why sould nos be? |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |