EVE Search - [IDEA] SHIP HOLD in industrial ship

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

[IDEA] SHIP HOLD in industrial ship

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lidia Caderu Harbingers of Chaos Inc The East India Co. 24	Posted - 2014.02.16 17:24:00 - [1] - Quote Currently we have ore holds and mineral holds in industrial ships its very nice. How about adding hold for packed ships and drones. Approx capacity at L5 = 70k m3 = BS + BC
Lakshata Chawla Blue-Fire 90	Posted - 2014.02.16 20:59:00 - [2] - Quote Lidia Caderu wrote: Currently we have ore holds and mineral holds in industrial ships its very nice. How about adding hold for packed ships and drones. Approx capacity at L5 = 70k m3 = BS + BC We have regular haulers for that, or SMA's in capitals.
Lidia Caderu Harbingers of Chaos Inc The East India Co. 24	Posted - 2014.02.16 23:25:00 - [3] - Quote Regular have too small hold, carriers not for hi-sec.
ShahFluffers Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance 4889	Posted - 2014.02.16 23:33:00 - [4] - Quote Orca. Change isn't bad, but it isn't always good. Sometimes, the oldest and most simple of things can be the most elegant and effective.
Alundil Sky Fighters 403	Posted - 2014.02.17 03:01:00 - [5] - Quote ShahFluffers wrote: Orca. This But support ops idea anyway because killmails. Clone mechanics enchancements Deep Space Probe Revival
Kaerakh Obscure Joke Implied 127	Posted - 2014.02.17 04:32:00 - [6] - Quote Alundil wrote: ShahFluffers wrote: Orca. This But support ops idea anyway because killmails. Freighter.
Crazy Dave Nerotic Transport Corp 4	Posted - 2014.02.17 04:58:00 - [7] - Quote Lidia Caderu wrote: Regular have too small hold, carriers not for hi-sec. An Orca carries ships nicely in highsec.
Kaerakh Obscure Joke Implied 127	Posted - 2014.02.17 05:52:00 - [8] - Quote Kaerakh wrote: Alundil wrote: ShahFluffers wrote: Orca. This But support ops idea anyway because killmails. Freighter. Red Frog.
Vesan Terakol Sad Face Enterprises 38	Posted - 2014.02.17 06:14:00 - [9] - Quote There is a reason this is not allowed, which is related to getting battleships into smaller class wormholes too easily. A ship, which can enter a C1, should not be able to carry inside a battleship.
Catherine Laartii Providence Guard Templis CALSF 70	Posted - 2014.02.17 07:24:00 - [10] - Quote I would be amenable to that, with the exception that the mass and material cost for the 'Hauler' type industrials to be a bit closer to battlecruisers, including hull hp. Separating the gap between the fast couriers and the heavy haulers would be ideal indeed. Perhaps they could set this up in conjunction with the t2 indy rebalance?
Danika Princip Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team 2472	Posted - 2014.02.17 12:51:00 - [11] - Quote Catherine Laartii wrote: I would be amenable to that, with the exception that the mass and material cost for the 'Hauler' type industrials to be a bit closer to battlecruisers, including hull hp. Separating the gap between the fast couriers and the heavy haulers would be ideal indeed. Perhaps they could set this up in conjunction with the t2 indy rebalance? So an orca then.
Claud Tiberius Falcon United 8	Posted - 2014.02.17 13:27:00 - [12] - Quote I would love to be able to separate a part of the hold and designate it as 'ammo storage' (or any other storage type I want). In other words, having separate windows for some item groups. That way I won't accidentally sell the ammo... I know its not changing space. Its just easier management.
Gawain Edmond Angry Mustellid 55	Posted - 2014.02.17 13:43:00 - [13] - Quote but the orca is a ship used by pirates so they don't have to dock up to re-ship to gank people it needs to be like the orca have half the bass twice the agility a tenth of the cost and twice the size of hold and you can't fit ships in it if you're in a gang with someone who's ever had a negative sec status change cause pirates are bad oh and it needs to have the tank of a carrier
Kasife Vynneve Nourwolf Corporation Fortis Et Certus 17	Posted - 2014.02.17 13:45:00 - [14] - Quote I carry small crates around for things like that in addition to the other fittings that I use on the ship at any given time
Lidia Caderu Harbingers of Chaos Inc The East India Co. 24	Posted - 2014.02.17 14:01:00 - [15] - Quote Danika Princip wrote: Catherine Laartii wrote: I would be amenable to that, with the exception that the mass and material cost for the 'Hauler' type industrials to be a bit closer to battlecruisers, including hull hp. Separating the gap between the fast couriers and the heavy haulers would be ideal indeed. Perhaps they could set this up in conjunction with the t2 indy rebalance? So an orca then. Too expansive, too slow, need lots of skills, same for freighter.
Danika Princip Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team 2473	Posted - 2014.02.17 14:20:00 - [16] - Quote Lidia Caderu wrote: Danika Princip wrote: Catherine Laartii wrote: I would be amenable to that, with the exception that the mass and material cost for the 'Hauler' type industrials to be a bit closer to battlecruisers, including hull hp. Separating the gap between the fast couriers and the heavy haulers would be ideal indeed. Perhaps they could set this up in conjunction with the t2 indy rebalance? So an orca then. Too expansive, too slow, need lots of skills, same for freighter. So you want something that does what an orca does, with no training or cost involved, and you think this is balanced because...?
Noxisia Arkana Deadspace Knights 163	Posted - 2014.02.17 15:12:00 - [17] - Quote 17 Days to get into an orca. It's a substantial investment (isk wise), but it's also a risk to fly - so, theoretically you don't have a bunch of new players jumping into them and hauling obscene amounts of ISK through space and getting blapped. I'm not seeing the need you've outlined.
Lidia Caderu Harbingers of Chaos Inc The East India Co. 24	Posted - 2014.02.17 21:24:00 - [18] - Quote Danika Princip wrote: Lidia Caderu wrote: Danika Princip wrote: Catherine Laartii wrote: I would be amenable to that, with the exception that the mass and material cost for the 'Hauler' type industrials to be a bit closer to battlecruisers, including hull hp. Separating the gap between the fast couriers and the heavy haulers would be ideal indeed. Perhaps they could set this up in conjunction with the t2 indy rebalance? So an orca then. Too expansive, too slow, need lots of skills, same for freighter. So you want something that does what an orca does, with no training or cost involved, and you think this is balanced because...? well for some reason CCP made all those specific Holds in indy ships, and that made life MUCH easier. Everything can potencially be carried in orca or in freighter...
Batelle Komm susser Tod 1794	Posted - 2014.02.17 21:38:00 - [19] - Quote OP is asking for packed ships. Industrials are large enough for that. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!" Never forget.
Catherine Laartii Providence Guard Templis CALSF 72	Posted - 2014.02.17 21:52:00 - [20] - Quote Danika Princip wrote: Catherine Laartii wrote: I would be amenable to that, with the exception that the mass and material cost for the 'Hauler' type industrials to be a bit closer to battlecruisers, including hull hp. Separating the gap between the fast couriers and the heavy haulers would be ideal indeed. Perhaps they could set this up in conjunction with the t2 indy rebalance? So an orca then. Orca has its own roles that it fills quite nicely. For the rest of us that don't feel like shelling out over half a billion isk to move our stuff, this thread is discussing balance changes to ships you might have flown. They're called industrials, and while their rebalance was nice, they could still use a little work.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.