Oh, but you have never corrected your typos.
You'll probably win because of your blocks votes, but certainly not because of your 'campaign'.

What's your view on the warp speed changes?

i think they better reflect reality and give use of different shiptypes more use in tactics. However i dont feel my view on a single part of eve is important, as CSM is a team effort. not a contest or debate who is right or wrong.

Well, technically speaking a CSM member CAN do that, but they shouldn't be surprised when the rest of the council as well as CCP suddenly become very interested in absolutely nothing they have to say if they DO try to voice their own opinion for once, nor be surprised to find themselves reviled as useless in public.

Which leads into a way that I need to elaborate.

Often (or more) as not, we've all got opinions that run the gamut from "variations of each other" to "polar opposites" and, particularly if consensus is reached, reaching it after having pitted them against each other only strengthens the final outcome by exposing holes and issues previously unseen. So, yes, it's frequently a contest or debate, and your views are absolutely important, which means you need to have them - there's little value in consensus reached by just +1ing someone else's opinion or idea.

CSM is a team effort. not a contest or debate who is right or wrong.

Yes seems to Be in line with rl, its more that if 14 people will push their own agenda and tie their feeling of succes into achieving that , that will tend to become a energy drain, u debate on the edge, but the end result will never be a full fullfillment of 14 agendas. Trebor told me last year it is sometimes the least rewarding job, as public opinion will be at best mixed, and feeling of Achievement needs to come from intrinsic motivation.

Thnx for the reply, gives good insight

...so because you might not get everything you want you're not going to try in the first place?

If I'm understanding you correctly and this is what you're actually saying, why are you running for CSM at all?

Yes seems to Be in line with rl, its more that if 14 people will push their own agenda and tie their feeling of succes into achieving that [...]

Its a rl issue u see in compagnies as well [...] In rl i see people turn bitter and starting to say [...]

I have given my vote already, and i would give it again if it'll help, i do not appreciate the negative comments to his copy and paste from last years run, because if thats ur passion and u type something new the next year then ur just apply'ing for the TITLE and not the ROLE to serve EVE's plilots.

When will you be doing an interview with Cap Stable?

I think it's clear Core believes Provibloc will elect him without the contribution of any outside support and without any need on his part to be accountable or work to articulate any kind of platform.

He'll probably get 1000-1200 votes at best that way. Whether that's enough this year, I don't know. Last year it wouldn't have worked.

I guess most of the provibloc that actually votes for him, haven't read this thread, and have no idea of how bad this candidate is.

I mean, you can see a list of the supporters that CTA +1 posted the thread and evemail them to let them know if you're sufficiently non-lazy. Personally, I can't be assed to and also would be seen as having an axe to grind, so...

I have removed a rule breaking post.

The Rules:
10. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.

Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties.

OK ... I will ask these same questions in a mail, as you stated, and then we will publish the results.
Considering the Dev Post: An Announcement Regarding Real Life Harassment, the very large response from the community, the affect this could have on game play, and the stated interest from the very pilots that are being asked to vote for a candidate who they are now being denied information they may find relative, I find this very curious.
This subject does NOT only affect CCP, or CSM, but many other EVE pilots.

Allowing other pilots to have this conversation on other websites has already make it a public matter.
You can't put the stink back in the bottle once you let it out.