Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

BAJRAN BALI
Rabid Ninja Space Monkey Inc. Monkeys with Guns.
42
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 22:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
This idea is based mainly to help out Faction Warfare corps and alliances, but all corps and alliances could benefit from this as passive incomes continue to dry up. I'll try and break this down to how it might help/hurt all aspects of space.
LetGÇÖs start with Null sec first. They are missing a considerable chunk of moon goo income these days. With the new ESS in null sec pilots are getting isk along with LP. The addition of LP, while using the ESS, magnifies how much a pilot can gain from ratting. LP the pilot is receiving is missed income for the corp and alliance. Allowing the corps to collect a small portion of the LP, possibly based on tax percentage, might entice Null sec corps and alliances to consider the ESS. This could also play an effect with the groups in null that run pirate faction missions.
High sec corps and alliances stand to gain, arguably, the most if this were to happen. This would just be another income generator for all High sec entities. This could even help create SRPGÇÖs for some High sec groups looking to get into wars or mercenary work.
None Faction Warfare Low sec corps and alliances could also benefit from this. There are groups who form corps and alliances around doing L5 missions. With the potential LP pay out to corps from these missions we might see some real action in and around these systems. I know some may argue that there is already action in these systems, but there are still many that are dead -+ of the day. This would be a great catalyst for content with all low sec missioning systems.
Faction Warfare Low sec corps and alliances tend to have an income problem. They mainly rely on donations from members to keep ship in stock and offices open. In Faction Warfare there is no real drive to rat as low sec rats donGÇÖt pay out well. Clone soldiers are rare and are not a dependable source of income for Faction Warfare groups. Our main drive is to kill our enemies and run Faction Warfare complexes. Both result in LP being paid out to the pilot. Adding a Corp LP tax could help finance SRPGÇÖs and any future AsakaiGÇÖs.
What are some other reasons this would be good? LP is a technically an ISK sink, we could always use more corp ISK sinks. Groups might move around to get the LP they want, Corps could turn in LP and use it for SRP.
I know my idea is far from perfect, but could make for a great addition to the game. Please give thoughts on this. With CCP looking to revamp corp permissions anyway this is a great time to put a bug in their ear.
YouTube: kds119 Twitter: @realkds119 Blog: derptw.blogspot.com |

Aquila Sagitta
Blue-Fire
225
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 22:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
They'll add this in 3 years when they do the corp role overhaul  Blue-Fire Best Fire |

Alundil
Sky Fighters
407
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
This post reserved for the first corporate LP Pool Theft Scam Threadnaught Clone mechanics enchancements Deep Space Probe Revival |

Catherine Laartii
Providence Guard Templis CALSF
77
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 00:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
I like the idea, but I think it should be set up for alliances, rather than individual corporations. I could see this being set up as a tax system, rather than a donation system. Although both might be equally viable, I could see this being useful in regards to farmers in the corp; they could contribute a bit more than they do now.
Although, to be entirely honest, I'd like to see them overhaul missions before they implement something like this. |

BAJRAN BALI
Rabid Ninja Space Monkey Inc. Monkeys with Guns.
42
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 06:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alundil wrote:This post reserved for the first corporate LP Pool Theft Scam Threadnaught God I hope so!
Catherine Laartii wrote:I like the idea, but I think it should be set up for alliances, rather than individual corporations. I could see this being set up as a tax system, rather than a donation system. Although both might be equally viable, I could see this being useful in regards to farmers in the corp; they could contribute a bit more than they do now.. As I stated, It could work well for both corps and alliances. Also I'm not sure if you misunderstood, but I meant it for a taxing tool.
Thanks for your input! YouTube: kds119 Twitter: @realkds119 Blog: derptw.blogspot.com |

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
1858
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 06:46:00 -
[6] - Quote
There needs to be options for transferring loyalty points between players. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Hesod Adee
Kiwis In Space
274
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 19:22:00 -
[7] - Quote
Batelle wrote:There needs to be options for transferring loyalty points between players. Yes there does.
But I think the OP is asking for something different: Tax the LP for the corp wallet. It sounds like a good idea. Until you find you have one member running missions for a different corp than everyone else or worse, a bunch of corps to get his standings up across high sec. Though being able to trade the LP for ISK would solve that problem. |

Corraidhin Farsaidh
Hello-There
211
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 20:23:00 -
[8] - Quote
Loyalty points are between the player and the corp...they should never be transferrable in my opinion, it just makes no sense in corporation terms...
I think a 'letter of recommendation' method could work to push a players lp up to faction level but other than that i can't agree on player to player lp transfer or lp tax. ('Player corp to npc corp: 'We're taking some of your trust in bob by way of tax. That's ok by you isn't it?'... |

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
1859
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 20:51:00 -
[9] - Quote
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:Loyalty points are between the player and the corp...they should never be transferrable in my opinion, it just makes no sense in corporation terms...
LP are currency just like everything else. They're just a currency that's really annoying to trade in. I would agree with you if LP was used for anything besides dispensing bacon to hungry little mission runners. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

BAJRAN BALI
Rabid Ninja Space Monkey Inc. Monkeys with Guns.
42
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 15:28:00 -
[10] - Quote
Let me take a second to clarify. I keep seeing where some are mentioning players trading LP. THIS IS NOT WHAT I MEANT. I'd like to see a corp LP tax to help generate ISK on the corp level to help with SRP's and other corp sponsored things. YouTube: kds119 Twitter: @realkds119 Blog: derptw.blogspot.com |
|

Corraidhin Farsaidh
Hello-There
211
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 15:35:00 -
[11] - Quote
Same principle though, the NPC corp trusts the player who performs duties for them, not the players corp so they wouldn't give LP to the players corp. If your players value your corp then they can convert LP to goods and give 10% of the profits
|

BAJRAN BALI
Rabid Ninja Space Monkey Inc. Monkeys with Guns.
42
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 16:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:Same principle though, the NPC corp trusts the player who performs duties for them, not the players corp so they wouldn't give LP to the players corp. Not sure I agree with this. NPC corp standings are not always based on the pilots standings. If you refer to Evelopedia and scroll to the boittom and read under "NPC Faction standings towards Player corporations" you'll notice player corp standings are taken into effect. To take an example, Jump clones can be obtained in short order by joining a player corp with an NPC corp standing of 8 or higher. If the player corp is trusted enough by the NPC corp to provide jump clones, even if the player corp pilot has terrible standing, I think the NPC corp can trust them enough with LP's in the form of a tax.
I've not been able to find exact information on Evelopedia about player corp standings allowing you to do missions for NPC agents you don't have access to with your personal standings, but I'm sure this comes into effect. I'm also unable to test this as I have no pilots with this particular issue. In the past I have obtained jump clones through my corp standings that I should not have been able to get without the aid of my corp's standings. YouTube: kds119 Twitter: @realkds119 Blog: derptw.blogspot.com |

Corraidhin Farsaidh
Hello-There
211
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 17:29:00 -
[13] - Quote
BAJRAN BALI wrote:Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:Same principle though, the NPC corp trusts the player who performs duties for them, not the players corp so they wouldn't give LP to the players corp. Not sure I agree with this. NPC corp standings are not always based on the pilots standings. If you refer to Evelopedia and scroll to the boittom and read under "NPC Faction standings towards Player corporations" you'll notice player corp standings are taken into effect. To take an example, Jump clones can be obtained in short order by joining a player corp with an NPC corp standing of 8 or higher. If the player corp is trusted enough by the NPC corp to provide jump clones, even if the player corp pilot has terrible standing, I think the NPC corp can trust them enough with LP's in the form of a tax. I've not been able to find exact information on Evelopedia about player corp standings allowing you to do missions for NPC agents you don't have access to with your personal standings, but I'm sure this comes into effect. I'm also unable to test this as I have no pilots with this particular issue. In the past I have obtained jump clones through my corp standings that I should not have been able to get without the aid of my corp's standings.
The rise in your own standings contributes to you corps standings I thought? Just feels wrong to think of taxing loyalty! The player should cash in LP and give 10% to the corp if they feel that strongly about it :D |

Hesod Adee
Kiwis In Space
282
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 19:45:00 -
[14] - Quote
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:Same principle though, the NPC corp trusts the player who performs duties for them, not the players corp so they wouldn't give LP to the players corp. If your players value your corp then they can convert LP to goods and give 10% of the profits
Standings represent the NPC corps trust in the capsuleer. Not loyalty points.
Loyalty points have nothing to do with trust or loyalty. They are just a currency that is annoying to use. |

BAJRAN BALI
Rabid Ninja Space Monkey Inc. Monkeys with Guns.
46
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 20:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
Hesod Adee wrote: Standings represent the NPC corps trust in the capsuleer. Not loyalty points.
Loyalty points have nothing to do with trust or loyalty. They are just a currency that is annoying to use.
This is what I'm getting at. LP is seen as a currency by most pilots. With that in mind I don't see why we couldn't put a tax on it for corps. YouTube: kds119 Twitter: @realkds119 Blog: derptw.blogspot.com |

Daichi Yamato
Xero Security and Technologies
1195
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 21:14:00 -
[16] - Quote
wouldnt mind.
LP's arent meant to be a currency as such. i think its a way to quantify NPC corp gratitude. Thus it makes sense to perhaps share it with the corp (like thanking a boss for sending good employees) but doesnt make sense to transfer LP between players (just because u say hes a good guy, doesn't mean they'll just beleive u and give them special stuff).
same way for standings. ur corp standings is affected by ur personal standing. but u cannot trade standings. EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY?No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided""So it will be up to a pilot to remain vigilant wherever they may be flying and be ready for anything at any time" |

BAJRAN BALI
Rabid Ninja Space Monkey Inc. Monkeys with Guns.
46
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 21:35:00 -
[17] - Quote
Daichi Yamato wrote:doesnt make sense to transfer LP between players
I agree with you here. This is a good time for me to specify about that. The LP should be collected in tax for much like isk off bounties for rats killed and mission rewards and deposited into the corp LP wallet. Now from here I feel it should be bound to the corp and could be spent by directors. Maybe the LP could even be it's own special division in the wallet and CEO's can allow access that way. In being bound to the corp this should solve any major LP monopoly's I could see come out of this. Also maybe not allow it to be added to the pilots LP who is spending it on behalf of the corp. YouTube: kds119 Twitter: @realkds119 Blog: derptw.blogspot.com |

Estella Osoka
Deep Void Merc Syndicate Sicarius Draconis
336
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 21:51:00 -
[18] - Quote
BAJRAN BALI wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:doesnt make sense to transfer LP between players I agree with you here. This is a good time for me to specify about that. The LP should be collected in tax for much like isk off bounties for rats killed and mission rewards and deposited into the corp LP wallet. Now from here I feel it should be bound to the corp and could be spent by directors. Maybe the LP could even be it's own special division in the wallet and CEO's can allow access that way. In being bound to the corp this should solve any major LP monopoly's I could see come out of this. Also maybe not allow it to be added to the pilots LP who is spending it on behalf of the corp.
Disagree. If you want to put a corp tax on LP paypouts, then you should go full tilt and allow LP transfers between players also. |

Xe'Cara'eos
A Big Enough Lever
96
|
Posted - 2014.03.19 23:54:00 -
[19] - Quote
BAJRAN BALI wrote:Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:Same principle though, the NPC corp trusts the player who performs duties for them, not the players corp so they wouldn't give LP to the players corp. Not sure I agree with this. NPC corp standings are not always based on the pilots standings. If you refer to Evelopedia and scroll to the boittom and read under "NPC Faction standings towards Player corporations" you'll notice player corp standings are taken into effect. To take an example, Jump clones can be obtained in short order by joining a player corp with an NPC corp standing of 8 or higher. If the player corp is trusted enough by the NPC corp to provide jump clones, even if the player corp pilot has terrible standing, I think the NPC corp can trust them enough with LP's in the form of a tax. I've not been able to find exact information on Evelopedia about player corp standings allowing you to do missions for NPC agents you don't have access to with your personal standings, but I'm sure this comes into effect. I'm also unable to test this as I have no pilots with this particular issue. In the past I have obtained jump clones through my corp standings that I should not have been able to get without the aid of my corp's standings.
player corp standings don't let you mission beyond your own standings, that I'm aware of..... that said - NPC corp standings are how you advance, though you can also mission enough with a friend to be able to pull out lvl 4's with a certain agent who you have a lousy corp standing towards..... For posting an idea into F&I: come up with idea, try and think how people could abuse this, try to fix your idea - loop the process until you can't see how it could be abused, then post to the forums to let us figure out how to abuse it..... If your idea can be abused, it WILL be. |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
296
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 00:27:00 -
[20] - Quote
BAJRAN BALI wrote:This idea is based mainly to help out Faction Warfare corps and alliances, but all corps and alliances could benefit from this as passive incomes continue to dry up. I'll try and break this down to how it might help/hurt all aspects of space.
LetGÇÖs start with Null sec first. They are missing a considerable chunk of moon goo income these days. With the new ESS in null sec pilots are getting isk along with LP. The addition of LP, while using the ESS, magnifies how much a pilot can gain from ratting. LP the pilot is receiving is missed income for the corp and alliance. Allowing the corps to collect a small portion of the LP, possibly based on tax percentage, might entice Null sec corps and alliances to consider the ESS. This could also play an effect with the groups in null that run pirate faction missions.
High sec corps and alliances stand to gain, arguably, the most if this were to happen. This would just be another income generator for all High sec entities. This could even help create SRPGÇÖs for some High sec groups looking to get into wars or mercenary work.
None Faction Warfare Low sec corps and alliances could also benefit from this. There are groups who form corps and alliances around doing L5 missions. With the potential LP pay out to corps from these missions we might see some real action in and around these systems. I know some may argue that there is already action in these systems, but there are still many that are dead -+ of the day. This would be a great catalyst for content with all low sec missioning systems.
Faction Warfare Low sec corps and alliances tend to have an income problem. They mainly rely on donations from members to keep ship in stock and offices open. In Faction Warfare there is no real drive to rat as low sec rats donGÇÖt pay out well. Clone soldiers are rare and are not a dependable source of income for Faction Warfare groups. Our main drive is to kill our enemies and run Faction Warfare complexes. Both result in LP being paid out to the pilot. Adding a Corp LP tax could help finance SRPGÇÖs and any future AsakaiGÇÖs.
What are some other reasons this would be good? LP is a technically an ISK sink, we could always use more corp ISK sinks. Groups might move around to get the LP they want, Corps could turn in LP and use it for SRP.
I know my idea is far from perfect, but could make for a great addition to the game. Please give thoughts on this. With CCP looking to revamp corp permissions anyway this is a great time to put a bug in their ear.
or you no, if your a real FW corp you have your tax rate set to 50% and have you members run missions for LP since you no LP in missions is WAY more isk than runing plexs. and wow look at that tons of isk.
TLDR: No, dont need another way for stupids leading masses to get rich. |
|

Tsobai Hashimoto
Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica
215
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 07:37:00 -
[21] - Quote
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:Loyalty points are between the player and the corp...they should never be transferrable in my opinion, it just makes no sense in corporation terms...
I think a 'letter of recommendation' method could work to push a players lp up to faction level but other than that i can't agree on player to player lp transfer or lp tax. ('Player corp to npc corp: 'We're taking some of your trust in bob by way of tax. That's ok by you isn't it?'...
it does in FW.....FW corps should get a small % of the LP. for having the logistics and leadership to man a corp willing to fight for the faction
this will help FW corps do SRP.....and that = more willing PVP |

Corraidhin Farsaidh
Hello-There
296
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 08:33:00 -
[22] - Quote
I would suggest a change whereby a corp can register with a faction for faction war and on that basis gets a commission based on the LP earned by a capsuleer in that corp. This would be LP to the corp wallet for use buying Faction gear (which obviously can be sold or used as thr corp wishes).
LP should always remain between the corp and capsuleer in terms of the current system though. You could argue that the player should be making the donations to the corp voluntarily to repay the support given. They are after all Privateers serving a given faction whilst it suits them and many are known to switch factions depending on who gives the best LP at any given time. |

BAJRAN BALI
Rabid Ninja Space Monkey Inc. Monkeys with Guns.
47
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 12:55:00 -
[23] - Quote
Flyinghotpocket wrote:or you no, if your a real FW corp you have your tax rate set to 50% and have you members run missions for LP since you no LP in missions is WAY more isk than runing plexs. and wow look at that tons of isk.
TLDR: No, dont need another way for stupids leading masses to get rich.
If I'm understanding you right, this thread is not about individuals getting richer. REAL FW corps don't run missions 23.5/7... They are out there fighting and taking the systems needed. Even if they did you need the higher FW tiers to make missions worth while. Those pilots are in their respected corps to have a support system just like any other part of space. Their corps likely rent offices, give out ships, do logistics, and if your really lucky give SRP. Low sec FW corps have a unique problem with their taxation of members. If they were able to get help from their members in this manner I think your would see even more destruction out of low sec.
Also another part of it for null sec is those new ESS's pay out LP. Those Null blocks one day will want a slice of that pie.
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:I would suggest a change whereby a corp can register with a faction for faction war and on that basis gets a commission based on the LP earned by a capsuleer in that corp. This would be LP to the corp wallet for use buying Faction gear (which obviously can be sold or used as thr corp wishes).
LP should always remain between the corp and capsuleer in terms of the current system though. You could argue that the player should be making the donations to the corp voluntarily to repay the support given. They are after all Privateers serving a given faction whilst it suits them and many are known to switch factions depending on who gives the best LP at any given time.
The issue I see with the registration is that this would be FW only... That could be a big problem in the long run as it wouldn't... and I can't belive I'm going to say this... FAIR for other groups who don't do FW. Each type of space should in some way be profitable, but you can't tilt one section of space to be more so without have serious drawbacks. Take WH's they are unique, but CRAZY profitable and have massive drawbacks. FW LOW SEC is still LOW SEC. Tilting that section of low sec that hard could be a problem. If we just add LP tax to everyone we still have a fairly level playing field. YouTube: kds119 Twitter: @realkds119 Blog: derptw.blogspot.com |

Noxisia Arkana
Deadspace Knights
241
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 16:10:00 -
[24] - Quote
Honestly, it would be nice if there was a 105% or a 101% payout for missions and player corporations got that 1% LP for having their members service a major faction.
It would give players an incentive to form their own corps in HS and possibly pull some players out of the NPC corp pool. In addition it could help fund fleet ops, fuel POS's, etc. And yes, someone will steal it, god willing. |

Alundil
Sky Fighters Sky Syndicate
434
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 16:32:00 -
[25] - Quote
Noxisia Arkana wrote:And yes, someone will steal it, god willing. That's the spirit hehe Clone mechanics enchancements Deep Space Probe Revival |

BAJRAN BALI
Rabid Ninja Space Monkey Inc. Monkeys with Guns.
47
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 17:49:00 -
[26] - Quote
Noxisia Arkana wrote:Honestly, it would be nice if there was a 105% or a 101% payout for missions and player corporations got that 1% LP for having their members service a major faction.
It would give players an incentive to form their own corps in HS and possibly pull some players out of the NPC corp pool. In addition it could help fund fleet ops, fuel POS's, etc. And yes, someone will steal it, god willing.
Are you saying that there should be a set flat tax that players can not change? Also with the over 100% payout we'd see more disposable LP rather than keeping it the same.
On to your second point I agree that an LP tax would be a HUGE incentive for the high sec guys! Could also open up new doors for scammers... Could even aid those high sec gankers... recruit and awox  YouTube: kds119 Twitter: @realkds119 Blog: derptw.blogspot.com |

Noxisia Arkana
Deadspace Knights
243
|
Posted - 2014.03.20 18:10:00 -
[27] - Quote
BAJRAN BALI wrote:Are you saying that there should be a set flat tax that players can not change? Also with the over 100% payout we'd see more disposable LP rather than keeping it the same. On to your second point I agree that an LP tax would be a HUGE incentive for the high sec guys! Could also open up new doors for scammers... Could even aid those high sec gankers... recruit and awox 
1. Flat Tax. No. What I'm looking at is this: LP pays out 100% to player. There is an additional (1%, .1%, whatever) that generates and goes into the corporate wallet. For NPC corps this will amount to no gain (there are no players able to take advantage of the corp wallet). For player corps; it gives incentive for people to come out of NPC corps and gives a way for corps to help fund ops, etc.
2. Being able to tax LP and Market transactions as a corp? Please no. |

BAJRAN BALI
Rabid Ninja Space Monkey Inc. Monkeys with Guns.
48
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 12:17:00 -
[28] - Quote
Haven't seen activity on this lately, but don't want to see it die off. I know FW mechanics are coming up soon and this needs to be fresh in the dev's minds. YouTube: kds119 Twitter: @realkds119 Blog: derptw.blogspot.com |

Seith Kali
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
36
|
Posted - 2014.05.08 18:57:00 -
[29] - Quote
I love the idea of a corporation sub-contracting missions to mission runners/ LP farming mercenaries. There's so much gameplay potential in tradable LP it is crazy not to allow it. Apprentice Goonswarm Economic Warfare Consultant - Drowning in entitlement and privilege.-á |

Corraidhin Farsaidh
Hello-There
466
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 03:48:00 -
[30] - Quote
Noxisia Arkana wrote:BAJRAN BALI wrote:Are you saying that there should be a set flat tax that players can not change? Also with the over 100% payout we'd see more disposable LP rather than keeping it the same. On to your second point I agree that an LP tax would be a HUGE incentive for the high sec guys! Could also open up new doors for scammers... Could even aid those high sec gankers... recruit and awox  1. Flat Tax. No. What I'm looking at is this: LP pays out 100% to player. There is an additional (1%, .1%, whatever) that generates and goes into the corporate wallet. For NPC corps this will amount to no gain (there are no players able to take advantage of the corp wallet). For player corps; it gives incentive for people to come out of NPC corps and gives a way for corps to help fund ops, etc. 2. Being able to tax LP and Market transactions as a corp? Please no.
That's a more workable idea I think, no trading or taxinf of player/mission corp LP, but a 1% LP recognition of tyhe players corp could work *but* the malcanis thingybob would apply so the major corps would simply benefit even more and become further out of reach for the asmaller corps so on that basis I'm still undecided,,, |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |