Lets also remove the velocity cap on hulls and let our skill determine what speed the ships go.



Also, DPS and tank.

I propose that we should remove the artificial limit of max number of locked targets on hulls and just let the pilots skills determine this value instead.

unless you fit active targeters.

One Question, what would Happen if we Limit the locks on one target.

Lets say, if 10 players can lock at the same Battleship but then every other player receive a fail message.

One Question, what would Happen if we Limit the locks on one target.

Lets say, if 10 players can lock at the same Battleship but then every other player receive a fail message.

One Question, what would Happen if we Limit the locks on one target.

Lets say, if 10 players can lock at the same Battleship but then every other player receive a fail message.

Ohh yay, is this a bad idea about targetting thread? :D

How about we remove all limits on how many targets you can lock, but you have to buy lock tokens. They are 10m3 and everytimeyou lock something it consumes a token.

Ohh yay, is this a bad idea about targetting thread? :D

No, this is the thread where people that want to prove how e-tough they are tell everyone how bad an idea is without actually addressing the idea itself. Usually with poor spelling and grammar.

No, this is the thread where people that want to prove how e-tough they are tell everyone how bad an idea is without actually addressing the idea itself.

The skill is quite useful at 5 given you fly hulls that can lock 10 targets a lot(logi, marauder, recon) and can make the extra 2 lock slots available to you by adding a signal amplifier or auto targeter. It is quite niche to bring it to 5, but it gives you a lot more ease and performance for some roles(cap logi for incursions or a remote rep marauder for example), at the cost of one low or utility high slots you get the additional locks your skill provides on the hull and can reduce the amount of target switching(because even 10 can be quite limited at times).

Like a lot of advanced logistic and recon skills it is quite niche but can be very useful to have if you fly logi on a daily basis for example, got everything maxed out and become a bit more flexible with the fitting and more proficient with the role.

The only person throwing around 'e-tough' so far has been you.

There's your solution. Problem solved.

In the future, if you want 'value for the skills you trained,' then fly ships that can take advantage of those skills.

I eagerly await your next thread, where you tell us that all ships should have their targeting range extended to 250km.

The idea has been addressed: It's bad, and has little to no merit.

The limit on max locked targets on a given hull is a balance point. If you want to lock more targets with a particular hull, you are intended to have to make tradeoffs by fitting active targeting mods or signal amps. That is the purpose of the limitation.

I would welcome an actual argument as to why a mining barge, frigate, battleship, or titan locking up to 12 targets is a 'balancing point.'

You forgot to include your noctis in that list.

You also forgot to include what the requisite slots are used for. This is where the tradeoff happens.

Do you want to use Auto Targets? Yes.

Does your ship have a utility high? Yes. Want more targets? Yes. Give up unbonused DPS or neuting/nosing/cloaking capability.

Does your ship have a utility high? No. Give up bonused DPS/mining yield/reps to lock more things.

Do you want to use signal amps instead? Yes.

Choose one commonly buffed stat to not buff:

Damage.

Tank.

Yield.

Speed.

Agility.