EVE Search - Concord response time stealth changed?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

Concord response time stealth changed?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Les Strout Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2014.03.01 09:36:00 - [1] - Quote Has concord response time stealth changed in the last couple of days? Systems (0.6) where I could easily gank a retriever in a catalyst suddenly leaves me 2-3 seconds short. I use same fit, no concord in belt and after completing my gank (now with wingman), they havent learned their lesson and changed fit either, which leaves me to conclude maybe Concord stopped eating too many donuts and are faster?
Ammzi Love Squad Black Legion. 1698	Posted - 2014.03.01 10:22:00 - [2] - Quote Yes, it's been changed. Either intended or not intended by CCP.
Les Strout Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2014.03.01 10:26:00 - [3] - Quote Ammzi wrote: Yes, it's been changed. Either intended or not intended by CCP. No doubt its intended, so yet another attempt to ninja convert Eve into "Risk free isk harvesting Online" Any ideas on how much was changed? Seems like 10-15% was shaved off response timer or so?
Shizuken Venerated Stars 184	Posted - 2014.03.01 11:39:00 - [4] - Quote Les Strout wrote: Has concord response time stealth changed in the last couple of days? Systems (0.6) where I could easily gank a retriever in a catalyst suddenly leaves me 2-3 seconds short. I use same fit, no concord in belt and after completing my gank (now with wingman), they havent learned their lesson and changed fit either, which leaves me to conclude maybe Concord stopped eating too many donuts and are faster? I think this is the closest to rage tears I will see from a griefer. Show me on this toy catalyst where the bad concord touched you...
Dsparil Mal Crime Incorporated 0	Posted - 2014.03.01 12:32:00 - [5] - Quote I don't think so. I thought so at first but i think the new ship warp times are playing a part in it combined with the current location of the concord ships. Also take into consideration whether or not there was a previous gank in the system after downtime. Terrorizing a few 0.6 amarr systems with no problem. Eve got a pod kill earlier this morning.
Les Strout Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2014.03.01 13:18:00 - [6] - Quote Shizuken wrote: Les Strout wrote: Has concord response time stealth changed in the last couple of days? Systems (0.6) where I could easily gank a retriever in a catalyst suddenly leaves me 2-3 seconds short. I use same fit, no concord in belt and after completing my gank (now with wingman), they havent learned their lesson and changed fit either, which leaves me to conclude maybe Concord stopped eating too many donuts and are faster? I think this is the closest to rage tears I will see from a griefer. Show me on this toy catalyst where the bad concord touched you... Nah just wondering, I'll just adapt to target size.
Agondray Avenger Mercenaries VOID Intergalactic Forces 56	Posted - 2014.03.01 21:36:00 - [7] - Quote This just in, "ganker fails ganking miner, blames eve devs, not pilots lack of talent/skills." "Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mine" -Dr. Smith
Haedonism Bot Revolutionary Front 883	Posted - 2014.03.02 09:56:00 - [8] - Quote Dsparil Mal wrote: I don't think so. I thought so at first but i think the new ship warp times are playing a part in it combined with the current location of the concord ships. CONCORD doesn't warp, it spawns, so warp times and location (unless they are already within 150 km of you) don't affect their response. It is possible the OP is just noticing the 6 second difference between a system where CONCORD has been pre-spawned and one where it has not. everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com
Serendipity Lost Repo Industries 151	Posted - 2014.03.02 10:00:00 - [9] - Quote Haedonism Bot wrote: Dsparil Mal wrote: I don't think so. I thought so at first but i think the new ship warp times are playing a part in it combined with the current location of the concord ships. CONCORD doesn't warp, it spawns, so warp times and location (unless they are already within 150 km of you) don't affect their response. It is possible the OP is just noticing the 6 second difference between a system where CONCORD has been pre-spawned and one where it has not. hahahahaha
Riot Girl You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack 2826	Posted - 2014.03.02 10:45:00 - [10] - Quote Shizuken wrote: Les Strout wrote: Has concord response time stealth changed in the last couple of days? Systems (0.6) where I could easily gank a retriever in a catalyst suddenly leaves me 2-3 seconds short. I use same fit, no concord in belt and after completing my gank (now with wingman), they havent learned their lesson and changed fit either, which leaves me to conclude maybe Concord stopped eating too many donuts and are faster? I think this is the closest to rage tears I will see from a griefer. Show me on this toy catalyst where the bad concord touched you... I've seen you post 3 times today and each post was filled with rage tears about gankers. Honestly, if you're going to berate gankers, you could at least try to act nonchalant about it. Oh god.

Dsparil Mal Crime Incorporated 1	Posted - 2014.03.02 13:14:00 - [11] - Quote Haedonism Bot wrote: Dsparil Mal wrote: I don't think so. I thought so at first but i think the new ship warp times are playing a part in it combined with the current location of the concord ships. CONCORD doesn't warp, it spawns, so warp times and location (unless they are already within 150 km of you) don't affect their response. It is possible the OP is just noticing the 6 second difference between a system where CONCORD has been pre-spawned and one where it has not. Ok well might be wrong about that. All I know is if I want to clear a belt of concord I just go to the gate and start shooting it with a noob alt and they leave the belt and show up there. Looks like warping to me. Good to know that. Means I don't need to be going all the way to the dawn gate to make shenanigans happen lol.
Alastair Ormand Badger Badger Badger Apocalypse Now. 56	Posted - 2014.03.03 08:30:00 - [12] - Quote Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears.
Danalee EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 538	Posted - 2014.03.03 09:23:00 - [13] - Quote Alastair Ormand wrote: Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears. Got a newsflash for you: Nullsec = Carebear Trammel lalaland, let's all hold hands and shoot structure while AFK. Hi and lowsec is where the action is. D.
Haedonism Bot Revolutionary Front 883	Posted - 2014.03.03 10:12:00 - [14] - Quote Alastair Ormand wrote: Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears. Haters gonna hate. everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 2893	Posted - 2014.03.03 10:27:00 - [15] - Quote Alastair Ormand wrote: Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears. The idea that PvP isn't supposed to exist except in specific places is precisely the hateful concept that makes many of us do this in the first place. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Morganta The Greater Goon Clockwork Pineapple 1968	Posted - 2014.03.04 19:11:00 - [16] - Quote Alastair Ormand wrote: Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears. null is terrible target rich environments is where its at and saving space penguins from filthy rock lickers
Tengu Grib Maniacal Laughter Ltd. 3	Posted - 2014.03.04 20:56:00 - [17] - Quote Alastair Ormand wrote: Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears. I tried living in Null. I was very bored. Now I live in High sec. Never had more fun in PVP! Tengu Grib > I agree. The distinct lack of quality spaceships makes RL the worst space sim ever.
Zan'der Hakaari State War Academy Caldari State 0	Posted - 2014.03.05 02:09:00 - [18] - Quote Alastair Ormand wrote: Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears. They don't want PVP though. They want PVS (player versus sheep). In null sec the targets shoot back and when they explode it's their own lack of skill to blame. If they fail at ganking miners or freighters that don't fight back the game hands them a perfect excuse for their failure. "It's Concords fault!"
Taoist Dragon Sh1t Happens. And then you die. 882	Posted - 2014.03.05 06:17:00 - [19] - Quote Zan'der Hakaari wrote: In null sec the targets shoot back I have to find this area of null. Most of the time when I go into nul the vast majority of time everyone just docks up. On the few occasions someone does undock they usually come ount with so much overkill (I normally fly T1 frigs/cruisers) that I usually just fly away. So in essence they are even worse than the 'carebear pvp'er' you are having ago at. There is a reason they are called null-bears! That is the Way, the Tao. Balance is everything. http://taoistdragon.blogspot.com.au/
BadAssMcKill Love Squad 673	Posted - 2014.03.05 20:18:00 - [20] - Quote Morganta wrote: Alastair Ormand wrote: Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears. null is terrible target rich environments is where its at and saving space penguins from filthy rock lickers There are penguins in space? http://i.imgur.com/6j6cIZE.gif-á

Shizuken Venerated Stars 192	Posted - 2014.03.06 20:16:00 - [21] - Quote Riot Girl wrote: I've seen you post 3 times today and each post was filled with rage tears about gankers. Honestly, if you're going to berate gankers, you could at least try to act nonchalant about it. Sweet, I have groupies...
Sarah xCalibre Pod Liberation Authority HYDRA RELOADED 40	Posted - 2014.03.07 16:54:00 - [22] - Quote Shizuken wrote: Riot Girl wrote: I've seen you post 3 times today and each post was filled with rage tears about gankers. Honestly, if you're going to berate gankers, you could at least try to act nonchalant about it. Sweet, I have groupies... Or at least a stalker, eh congrats? Ive deleted this sig 500 times now! - Sarah xCalibre
Alyth The Scope Gallente Federation 4	Posted - 2014.03.08 03:29:00 - [23] - Quote BadAssMcKill wrote: Morganta wrote: Alastair Ormand wrote: Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears. null is terrible target rich environments is where its at and saving space penguins from filthy rock lickers There are penguins in space? You were unaware?
Tacomaco No Taxes just fun 10	Posted - 2014.03.10 09:44:00 - [24] - Quote Oh, fail gankers made a wine thread. Nerf Concord. It's like criminals complaining about the police been to fast to respond. Maybe you should start where the newb gankers start in 0.5 or even better 0.1-0.4? Oh, wait, in low-sec other players may shoot at you. Gankers complaining on the "Crime & Punishment" forum for failing their ganks.....pathetic. Maybe CONCORD should degrade your security to -5.0 after the first miner gank. After all you're a pirate and you don't mind that, right?. Then you can live like a real pirate and players can remove you from your ship on site.
Tul Breetai Impromptu Asset Requisition 728	Posted - 2014.03.10 10:30:00 - [25] - Quote Shizuken wrote: I think this is the closest to rage tears I will see from a griefer. Show me on this toy catalyst where the bad concord touched you... Gankers don't cry, they just go grab another cat. Anti-gankers, on the other hand... Tacomaco wrote: Oh, fail gankers made a wine thread. Nerf Concord. It's like criminals complaining about the police been to fast to respond. Maybe you should start where the newb gankers start in 0.5 or even better 0.1-0.4? Oh, wait, in low-sec other players may shoot at you. Gankers complaining on the "Crime & Punishment" forum for failing their ganks.....pathetic. Maybe CONCORD should degrade your security to -5.0 after the first miner gank. After all you're a pirate and you don't mind that, right?. Then you can live like a real pirate and players can remove you from your ship on site. He asked if it had been changed to eliminate human error from his conclusion. He got an answer, and stated he'd simply adapt. Then you came in and started crying about your ore-fueled fantasies... There's nothing worse than an EVE player, generally considered to be top of the food chain in the MMO world, that cannot smacktalk with wit and coherency.
Tul Breetai Impromptu Asset Requisition 728	Posted - 2014.03.10 10:32:00 - [26] - Quote double post There's nothing worse than an EVE player, generally considered to be top of the food chain in the MMO world, that cannot smacktalk with wit and coherency.
Lakotnik TSOE Po1ice TSOE Consortium 0	Posted - 2014.03.10 11:27:00 - [27] - Quote Danalee wrote: Alastair Ormand wrote: Want PVP? Go to null sec. Stop being high sec PVP carebears. Got a newsflash for you: Nullsec = Carebear Trammel lalaland, let's all hold hands and shoot structure while AFK. Hi and lowsec is where the action is. D. Is that why so many l33t pvp people are in NPC corps like you? Such douchebaggery shall not be tolerated. Plenty of pvp in null all the time. Null isn't all about sieging structures, you should get out more -.D
Bethan Le Troix Krusual Investigation Agency 78	Posted - 2014.03.10 15:45:00 - [28] - Quote Les Strout wrote: Has concord response time stealth changed in the last couple of days? Systems (0.6) where I could easily gank a retriever in a catalyst suddenly leaves me 2-3 seconds short. I use same fit, no concord in belt and after completing my gank (now with wingman), they havent learned their lesson and changed fit either, which leaves me to conclude maybe Concord stopped eating too many donuts and are faster? I don't think the response times have changed within the last month. That is rather like the comments that invention chance has changed which hasn't either. It's one of two things: 1) CONCORD were already somewhere in-system. 2) An issue related to tanking on the Retriever or the type of guns or ammo you were using. Which guns/ammo an how many of were you using? Also if you are using the char you are posting with you won't have enough skills to do the job in time. So hopefully that is your posting alt?


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.