| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jason Marshall
   |
Posted - 2006.04.20 15:55:00 -
[1]
So, i dont think missles should be nerfed, i htink there just needs to be counter measures. Notthing uber but maybe a energy weapon the destoys them at like 2-3km away still doing damage just not has much. And also misles shouldnt be able to turn like they are, i sit 500m off the guy thats firing them and they just turn right around, not so much them comming back but that they dont do any damage. there needs to be ways to defend againts them on ships that cant use defender missles.
|
Drew Blaze
|
Posted - 2006.04.20 16:28:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Jason Marshall
Notthing uber but maybe a energy weapon the destoys them at like 2-3km away still doing damage just not has much.
-They already have this, its called a "Smartbomb"
___________________________
Secret Alt. |
Marine HK4861
|
Posted - 2006.04.20 16:53:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Jason Marshall
And also misles shouldnt be able to turn like they are, i sit 500m off the guy thats firing them and they just turn right around, not so much them comming back but that they dont do any damage.
I'm going to guess and say that you're complaining that missiles hit too easily?
All a missile basically consists of is a warhead, propulsion system and a guidance system. They're not going to be to so immobile they can't fly and track you.
Modern cruise missiles can do a perfect 90 degree turn, so whay can't missiles in the future be able to hit any target within its range?
Originally by: Jason Marshall
there needs to be ways to defend againts them on ships that cant use defender missles.
There's the traditional way of fooling missiles - EWar.
(Of course, the counter to that is FOF missiles...)
The problem with the EVE missile system is that the missiles work off the ship's targeting system, rather than being self guided.
I'd welcome some additional Ewar counter measures, like a ghost imager (create an additional target on the target ship's sensors).
Other than that, tank for their damage, go really fast and keep your sig radius as small as possible.
|
Brer Lapin
|
Posted - 2006.04.20 22:03:00 -
[4]
Hi Im Scissors,
Papers fine but rock needs a nerf.
|
LUGAL MOP'N'GLO
|
Posted - 2006.04.21 00:58:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Brer Lapin
Hi Im Scissors,
Papers fine but rock needs a nerf.
^^^Nice one 
I agree.
... + didn't missiles already get nerfed? I'm new to the game, but I heard there was a huge nerf on missiles and caldarians were pretty tossed about the patch.
|
LUGAL MOP'N'GLO
|
Posted - 2006.04.21 01:02:00 -
[6]
By they way, there are ways to reduce the damage of missiles.
*You fly a small ship, they're shooting big missiles, you're doing just fine.
*You are flying fast or faster than the missile's explosion velocity... you're in heaven.
*You have defender missiles... you might need more, but they do work.
*Ewar = FOF's (If they even have them onboard). FOF's don't hurt.
|
Jimmy Doe
|
Posted - 2006.04.21 11:10:00 -
[7]
Originally by: LUGAL MOP'N'GLO
By they way, there are ways to reduce the damage of missiles.
*You fly a small ship, they're shooting big missiles, you're doing just fine.
*You are flying fast or faster than the missile's explosion velocity... you're in heaven.
*You have defender missiles... you might need more, but they do work.
*Ewar = FOF's (If they even have them onboard). FOF's don't hurt.
cruise missile worst enemy = interceptor with mwd, takes sooooooooooo long to kill unless you use t2 precision missiles, hell for that matter, a condor with a good ab orbiting at 5km can be a pain in the ass.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |