Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Alto Saotomei
Applied Paragon Control
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 17:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
no, I'm not trolling :P I'm just curious as to why carriers aren't allowed into high sec for PVE. I can see having them do PVP in high sec getting out of hand but why not just limit them to only PVE in high sec unless attacked? I know literally nothing when it comes to the capital class ships but it just seems a bit odd to me, can any1 help explain this to me? |
Qalix
Long Jump.
155
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 17:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
Philosophical stuff aside: carriers can't jump normal gates and you can't light a cyno in hisec. |
Batelle
HOMELE55
2180
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 18:10:00 -
[3] - Quote
Alto Saotomei wrote:I can see having them do PVP in high sec getting out of hand but why not just limit them to only PVE in high sec unless attacked?
Maybe because they would be out of hand for PVE too?
Plus how exactly would you propose limiting them to PVE-only "unless attacked?" "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
3250
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 20:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
No POS would ever die except if the corp was dead.
Also station games would be a lot worse. |
Noxisia Arkana
Deadspace Knights
229
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 20:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alto Saotomei wrote:no, I'm not trolling :P I'm just curious as to why carriers aren't allowed into high sec for PVE. I can see having them do PVP in high sec getting out of hand but why not just limit them to only PVE in high sec unless attacked? I know literally nothing when it comes to the capital class ships but it just seems a bit odd to me, can any1 help explain this to me?
Incentive to leave highsec. I'm inclined to believe that 1. capitals unbalance highsec game play. 2. for some high end content you should have to leave highsec. |
Hasikan Miallok
Republic University Minmatar Republic
408
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 00:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
The carriers and dreads remaindered in highsec are purely for showing off though you can of course mine with them.
I suppose if you got a hold of one of the few left (is their still a Revenant trapped in Perimeter ?) you could park in it an incursion to draw fire away from the rest of your ships. However in reality why would you want to use one for missioning as marauders are far easy to train for and can do the job fine and are far less of a gank magnet :D |
Luwc
Easy Co. Fatal Ascension
62
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 07:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
because a) needs cyno b) cant get suicide ganked. |
Corp 5py
Trolol0l
24
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 08:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Hasikan Miallok wrote:you could park in it an incursion to draw fire away from the rest of your ships
Capitals (other than freighters/orca) also can't take acceleration gates
Only way to get them into a incursion (assuming they are already inside the system) would be to bump them 10 000 k from the accel gate into the incursion pocket direction, over the course of 10-15 hours or so ... |
Boomhaur
198
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 17:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
A carrier in high sec doing lv4's . That should explain it.
Don't forget carriers in high sec PVP, overpowered again.
Carriers being practically ungankable for hauling goods, overpowered.
Carriers mining in high sec, now that's just funny. Welcome to Eve. Everyone here is an Evil Sick Sadistic Bastard who is out to get you. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either trying to scam you or use you. |
Mykal Day
Kiss My Assets
2
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 18:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
Assign drones/fighters to your missioning ship and finish a L4 in ten minutes. Seems balanced. |
|
Tarsas Phage
Freight Club
261
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 17:49:00 -
[11] - Quote
Let's not overlook the fact that capitals cannot use acceleration gates. And assigned fighters can't go through them as well. |
Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
4249
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 19:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
I'd be okay with Concord having carriers if Concord went back to being killable. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did. |
Scrimtar
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 20:29:00 -
[13] - Quote
I would be for a mission that had a carrier in it like a multi player mission. |
Loraine Gess
Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists
148
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 21:19:00 -
[14] - Quote
Scrimtar wrote:I would be for a mission that had a carrier in it like a multi player mission.
This already exists |
Lady Naween
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
502
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 22:22:00 -
[15] - Quote
Scrimtar wrote:I would be for a mission that had a carrier in it like a multi player mission.
Sisters of Eve Epic Arc, the blood stained stars has a hostile niddy in it. You can pew pew it. Takes a while mind you :) |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |