Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
697
|
Posted - 2014.06.18 18:25:00 -
[31] - Quote
Dally Lama wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:Kethry Avenger wrote:Yes clearly the "primary way" players interact in eve is Wardecs. Not chat, not the market, not ganks, or any other means. Your really appear to be grasping at straws. Either get rid of mechanical benefits like corp hangars and keeping tax and make it a purely social enhancing feature (something that makes what can be done already, easier to do), or keep the corp assets and be subject to war decs. This. It's vital for the game's long term survival that non-wardeccable social groups can be easily created and recruited into. It's also vital these groups have absolutely no benefits corps have - besides calenders and social tools - in order to make upgrading to corps a feasible goal for the group. Once this is done, they can change regular corporations up so that dropping corp during a war keeps you flagged in the war for the remainder of the week. Mmmmmm.... balance, choices... yummy! You mean chat channels and mailing lists?
|
Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1124
|
Posted - 2014.06.18 18:37:00 -
[32] - Quote
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:Dally Lama wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:Kethry Avenger wrote:Yes clearly the "primary way" players interact in eve is Wardecs. Not chat, not the market, not ganks, or any other means. Your really appear to be grasping at straws. Either get rid of mechanical benefits like corp hangars and keeping tax and make it a purely social enhancing feature (something that makes what can be done already, easier to do), or keep the corp assets and be subject to war decs. This. It's vital for the game's long term survival that non-wardeccable social groups can be easily created and recruited into. It's also vital these groups have absolutely no benefits corps have - besides calenders and social tools - in order to make upgrading to corps a feasible goal for the group. Once this is done, they can change regular corporations up so that dropping corp during a war keeps you flagged in the war for the remainder of the week. Mmmmmm.... balance, choices... yummy! You mean chat channels and mailing lists?
:effort: |
Kaerakh
Surprisingly Deep Hole
314
|
Posted - 2014.06.18 18:44:00 -
[33] - Quote
This area of idea gets brought up way too often to have an original idea or post for.
See Page 22 Section 7.2
My general thoughts on Carebears trying to create game mechanics to protect them from the mean evil gankers. 1 - 2 Schrodinger's Hot Dropper |
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
440
|
Posted - 2014.06.18 23:21:00 -
[34] - Quote
Daoden wrote:Nalelmir Ahashion wrote:I find the only thing which needs to be done is to give more love to the war dec mechanics make it more a war and not "Tax" to gank free. I say when a corp/alliance is at war they cannot use locator agents for their WTs. Make it a little bit harder to track people. I have never used an alt in corp im wardeccing with to locate.
I love my amamake locator agent.
All those agents.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|
Laura Agathon
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2014.06.19 18:32:00 -
[35] - Quote
Nalelmir Ahashion wrote:I find the only thing which needs to be done is to give more love to the war dec mechanics make it more a war and not "Tax" to gank free.
This. +1
Anyone who flys through highsec will see 'gatecamps' of groups such as Marmite who just pay their tax and kill bears for a week or two.
|
Kethry Avenger
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
129
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 03:58:00 -
[36] - Quote
Kaerakh wrote:This area of idea gets brought up way too often to have an original idea or post for.
Sorry I ruined your EVE-O veiwing experience. (not really)
Read thread don't want them to be safe, maybe safer, but not safe.
Kaerakh wrote:My general thoughts on Carebears trying to create game mechanics to protect them from the mean evil gankers.
Let's see, carebeared, pirated, flew in FW, and have gone back to pirating. Also EVE is my first MMO and have no interest in WoW mostly cause it looks horrible. Now if Warcraft 4 as an RTS comes out let me know.
I think war should be about assets in space or at least something more than a grief tax. Despite whatever hyperbolic roleplaying reasons this years greifers come up with to get past the EULA to collect their tears.
I oddly would like my sci-fi universe to hold up to some logically consistency. And if that also gives new groups of players a chance to get established, and work their way up the chain then bonus. Or my main point...
On freighters, haulers and barges. I would love to see them have the fitting room and slots commensurate with their class size but have their base stats lessened so that a well fit one would haul or mine less but be very hard to gank, where a poorly fit one would almost be giving the gankers their loot. |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1212
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 04:15:00 -
[37] - Quote
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:Dally Lama wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:Kethry Avenger wrote:Yes clearly the "primary way" players interact in eve is Wardecs. Not chat, not the market, not ganks, or any other means. Your really appear to be grasping at straws. Either get rid of mechanical benefits like corp hangars and keeping tax and make it a purely social enhancing feature (something that makes what can be done already, easier to do), or keep the corp assets and be subject to war decs. This. It's vital for the game's long term survival that non-wardeccable social groups can be easily created and recruited into. It's also vital these groups have absolutely no benefits corps have - besides calenders and social tools - in order to make upgrading to corps a feasible goal for the group. Once this is done, they can change regular corporations up so that dropping corp during a war keeps you flagged in the war for the remainder of the week. Mmmmmm.... balance, choices... yummy! You mean chat channels and mailing lists? Add to that an identifiable corp affiliation, however loose, even if effectively name only, and simple boolean access control/setup that membership would create.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |