| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
La Nariz
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
2139
   |
Posted - 2014.04.23 19:04:00 -
[61] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:La Nariz wrote:A better alternative would be nerfing highsec. For example we can remove concord which will make it much easier to punish those bad people. Makes no sense. Removing CONCORD will buff highsec a lot more than you would believe. People will band together and protect themselves. Idiots will leave the game and more hardcore players will come in. New players would finally get around to actually GET the game and learn to survive within a matter of hours, because other players will see the need of teaching of them. It would be far more cutthroat and realistic, as in much better mirroring natures laws instead of having people wrongly assume they are safe anyway. People would also spread out more and not concentrate that much in highsec, because nobody would want to be around where many unaffiliated others are. It would be much better than most weaklings try to make us believe. Would it cost subs? Yes. Would it pay off? Most likely!
Since its a highsec buff then it needs to be done now, surely the faction police will appreciate this increase in usefulness.
This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team.
Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |
La Nariz
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
2139
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 19:09:00 -
[62] - Quote
Doireen Kaundur wrote:La Nariz wrote:A better alternative would be nerfing highsec. For example we can remove concord which will make it much easier to punish those bad people. If you ever decide to name another toon, may I suggest : Las Nalgas? 
I was going to go with Las Nalgas Gordas or Culo Gordo.
This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team.
Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |
Doireen Kaundur
802
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 19:33:00 -
[63] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Doireen Kaundur wrote:La Nariz wrote:A better alternative would be nerfing highsec. For example we can remove concord which will make it much easier to punish those bad people. If you ever decide to name another toon, may I suggest : Las Nalgas? I was going to go with Las Nalgas Gordas or Culo Gordo.
LOL!!
Excellent choices. 
A great American humorist and author recently said:
"The one unintentional flaw of the internet generation is its ability to give the stupidest segments of our population the loudest voices."
I have a tendency to agree with his statement.-á |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
4816
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 19:42:00 -
[64] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Solecist Project wrote:La Nariz wrote:A better alternative would be nerfing highsec. For example we can remove concord which will make it much easier to punish those bad people. Makes no sense. Removing CONCORD will buff highsec a lot more than you would believe. People will band together and protect themselves. Idiots will leave the game and more hardcore players will come in. New players would finally get around to actually GET the game and learn to survive within a matter of hours, because other players will see the need of teaching of them. It would be far more cutthroat and realistic, as in much better mirroring natures laws instead of having people wrongly assume they are safe anyway. People would also spread out more and not concentrate that much in highsec, because nobody would want to be around where many unaffiliated others are. It would be much better than most weaklings try to make us believe. Would it cost subs? Yes. Would it pay off? Most likely! Since its a highsec buff then it needs to be done now, surely the faction police will appreciate this increase in usefulness.
So at best you get a day or two of gleeful gankfest.
Tell me, do you sit around dreaming of this stuff?
Bring back DEEEEP Space! |
Brusanan
Sardaukar Merc Guild
General Tso's Alliance
320
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 20:06:00 -
[65] - Quote
Perma-blinky, limit them to highsec and don't allow them to dock. When they get podded they should be immediately ejected from the station in an Alpha clone.
Psychotic Monk and DJ FunkyBacon for CSM! |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
1148
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 20:09:00 -
[66] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Another way we could punish players is force them to do cosplay at fanfest. But that could harm a lot of bystanders. 
Danger, Will Robinson. You don't want a certain space detective on your case for torturing people.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
775
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 20:15:00 -
[67] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Another way we could punish players is force them to do cosplay at fanfest. But that could harm a lot of bystanders. Danger, Will Robinson. You don't want a certain space detective on your case for torturing people.
Now I wonder if anybody shows up as Inspecteur Clueless at fanfest...
################################
|
Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy
572
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 20:42:00 -
[68] - Quote
Doireen Kaundur wrote:How about just making them permanent blinky?
May as well let the community have some fun.
This would be attractive to some players.... I do not like the idea of subsidizing poor behavior.
-á-á- remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not-á "afk" cloaking-á-
[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG] |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1193
|
Posted - 2014.04.24 00:38:00 -
[69] - Quote
If and when you have a serious and well worded proposal for the betterment of EvE, please feel free to post it in the Features & Ideas Discussion part of the forum.
Thread locked.
ISD Ezwal
Captain
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |