Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Kunming
|
Posted - 2006.05.18 12:34:00 -
[31]
Did he said "next year"?
|

Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.05.18 12:38:00 -
[32]
Originally by: BoinKlasik im hoping honestly that their definition of "premium" means its an awsome feature not that you have to pay more, becuase it would be silly to split the community like that, and game cards would have to come in 2 flavors now... it would suck royally.
No, that one's easy actually. If you select the premium features, you just get less subscription days.
"The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most glaring injustice" - Quellchrist Falconer |

Mastoras
|
Posted - 2006.05.18 13:06:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Tristan Sounds like the VOIP system is going to work something like how it works in BF2.
And in BF2 people still use TS, just so you know CCP.
I think a big reason people dont use BF2 built in voice chat is because its not voice activated. You have to press a button to talk on the keyboard. For a FPS game, thats horrible, last thing you need is to always be distracted for pressing a button to give crucial command when under fire!
Maybe they changed it since then, but thats the way i remember. So anyways, i think CCP will be voice activated, thats always good.
|

Bob Smackalof
|
Posted - 2006.05.18 13:49:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Mastoras
Originally by: Tristan Sounds like the VOIP system is going to work something like how it works in BF2.
And in BF2 people still use TS, just so you know CCP.
I think a big reason people dont use BF2 built in voice chat is because its not voice activated. You have to press a button to talk on the keyboard. For a FPS game, thats horrible, last thing you need is to always be distracted for pressing a button to give crucial command when under fire!
Maybe they changed it since then, but thats the way i remember. So anyways, i think CCP will be voice activated, thats always good.
Voice activated sucks.
Someone with a mic and a kid - SCREEEEEAM Other guys - Dude, wtf? Sort it out.
And, we (well, I don't) don't want to hear people sneezing and caughing either. -------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------- |

videorecorder
|
Posted - 2006.05.18 15:00:00 -
[35]
De Ja VU!
This has been posted 5 days ago....n00bs!!!!
|

videorecorder
|
Posted - 2006.05.18 15:01:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Da Death I just found this
Yeah, but the rest of the world found it DAYS ago...and posted it here 
|

Aenean sed
|
Posted - 2006.05.18 15:22:00 -
[37]
Edited by: Aenean sed on 18/05/2006 15:22:44 This just links me to guitar hero?
|

Kitty Stormwarden
|
Posted - 2006.05.18 15:47:00 -
[38]
If CCP do start having a tier system with premium add ons etc.. I will be leaving and will go play WoW and will take my measly 2 accounts with me I have a family to support and paying for 2 accounts is my limit, I could not validate paying more money than I do currently for a GAME! Why develop a system that we have been using effectively and free for so long (TS) then charge for a similar product. $$$$ v's Free, any takers? 
|

Kharak'khan
|
Posted - 2006.05.18 17:11:00 -
[39]
I got to admit That if i have to pay more to play then i will just quit and take my accounts with me!
|

000Hunter000
|
Posted - 2006.05.18 18:15:00 -
[40]

WTH happened to ccp's statement about 'we will not charge extra for new content'? 
Next thing we know we will be facing sharding as well 
|
|

Tedeski
|
Posted - 2006.05.18 18:24:00 -
[41]
The interviewer going "yes" at random intervals did not do anything for me.
Also him saying "Eve Online" is a lot like hearing your mum say "cool"
|

Julia Reave
|
Posted - 2006.05.18 18:49:00 -
[42]
Edited by: Julia Reave on 18/05/2006 18:49:08
Originally by: 000Hunter000

WTH happened to ccp's statement about 'we will not charge extra for new content'? 
Next thing we know we will be facing sharding as well 
Good question...and btw sharding is already in full motion, second shard = Serenity.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |