Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Magnus Cortex
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
105
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 18:48:00 -
[31] - Quote
grrr |

Xavier Holtzman
Imploding Turtles Rising in Outerspace Gravity Fatal Ascension
119
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 18:54:00 -
[32] - Quote
Soul Asassin wrote:Eve has become a pathetic excuse of a ghost of its former self. Virtually the entire null sec has become renter space, which is pathetic retards that cannot fend for themselves, have no b*lls to grow some brains and educate themselves as to the fact that the 2 major power blocs have nothing because of the thousands or mini alliances.
Hmmmm....half he problem is you bunch of wannabe monkey that call your selves pvp'ers have no b**ls to actually do anything about making eve fun. Oh i forgot, the biggest monkey of all is cfc leader hile "******" or in other words the leader of stupids. There are so many alliances and so many players i may as well forget this stupid ******** eve online. Its become the biggest waste of money eve known. First and foremost, you ask why? Please tell me that the majority of hte players in eve are not that stupid. Please enlighten me to the fact that the majority of eve players irrespective of race/creed or gender actually have a pair to fight back with. I mean, fighting anyone in eve now days is stale, is boring, its the same old b***sh*t now days. You shoot, you kill, you mine and rat, and manufacture. How has the fact that 2 ego tripping power maniac numbn*ts powerblocs made any difference to eve except for forcing idiots to pay them huge sums of isk to rent systems? Where do actual (real) players benefit from renting in null sec? Especially the a**holes that so called control it? I want to understand how a new player that has no idea how null sec works, will be able to join his buddies if any, in null sec to rat/pve or mine, or even understand how pvp works with the fact that the majority or accounts now days in null sec ae owned by the same users of a wide variety of accounts. Speaking of experience, of owning 37 accounts. I am curious how its even remotely possible how ccp and/or gm's can be that naive about eve online. They make so many rules and fail miserably to see whats in front of their faces.
I have enjoyed eve online for many years. But alas, with it growing increasingly boring, and null sec going to the dogs and null sec becoming nothing but a wasteland of trash, idiots, morons with alts, and more and no more real pvp, its no wonder people whine about the fact that Providence is the heart of pvp and they all suck at it except those living in providence. I was always a deep null sec inhabitant with my alts. From what i have seen, null sec has gone to the dogs. I would not wipe my boot off on the null sec owned by other alliances now days. They have no will power, no ambition, no balls to actually want to have pvp in their regions. HTye are dry, a waste of time, and a waste of pvp effort and isk. Its is a no wonder after camping providence for the past 2 months seeing that providence seems to be the only people crazy enough to have the balls to gun at anyone that challenge their pvp arena.
After playing for so many years, i con only hope that one day after someone decides to grow pair of cast iron b*lls that maybe the 1001 mini alliances will pull their heads from their collective a**es and actually grow a pair of brains to notice they can if every damn corp or alliance actually suck it up, stop trying to be the boss of every damn corp alliance, and actually stand together and try to beat down the larger powerblocs like they deserve. Oh wait that won't happen, i forgot, the majority (60%) of the eve online accounts are actually owned by the one and the same persons, depending on what group. CCP's naive attemps at trying ot bring more people to REAL people to the fold has only brought 10 times the amount of alts/alt accounts, and in the end making the entire game a complete RL and real time waste of time to play anymore. I have no problem with constructive criticism. Any one disagreeing with the majority of this is clearly an alt account, or clearly the account holder of an account/character in one of the 2 largest power blocs in eve online.
Show us on the doll where the goons touched you. -x |

General Nusense
Not Posting With My Main
131
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 18:54:00 -
[33] - Quote
Willmahh wrote:it seems you left your balls on your main...
oh look an edgy "post with your main" post.
try playing the game for longer than 10 months before you post.
kthx.
|

Shiloh Templeton
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
119
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 18:59:00 -
[34] - Quote
Please, if you have children or pets at home ... take them someplace safe. |

Kabeerah Kebab
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
20
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:03:00 -
[35] - Quote
Great post OP |

Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
714
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:05:00 -
[36] - Quote
grr who? Remove insurance. |

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
927
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:10:00 -
[37] - Quote
I'm going to buck the trend and say I actually agree with the OP in a sense...
Null SOV needs a redo IMHO, to encourage more small/mid level fights, and encourage smaller alliances to take and try and hold SOV. The current model of ridiculous force projection, blue-donut, pets and everyone pouring into a single system every six months is not compelling gameplay. IMHO.
Would you like to know more? |

Talon Creed
Capital Fusion. Circle-Of-Two
1
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:11:00 -
[38] - Quote
text.... 
tldr  |

Caviar Liberta
Moira. Villore Accords
527
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:21:00 -
[39] - Quote
Just checked and nobody has asked yet. Can I have your stuff? |

Zheng'Yi Sao
DIRTY MONEY INC. The Mountain Empire
49
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:21:00 -
[40] - Quote
It is the end of the term, and I have tens of pages yet to write, but I am feeling a bit pedantic.
I am also procrastinating and not writing said papers at the moment. There is only so much Hegel one can take in a day...
To the OP...
You should, perhaps, refine your writing style. Obviously you are impassioned about something, but it drowns in a swirl of verbal discordance; hence, it is labeled a rant. I suggest you follow a more traditional, and abbreviated, format with a more structured approach.
1: Thesis Your proposal, your argument, what it is you wish to discuss. It is optional to have an introduction. It serves no scholarly purpose other than to set the mood or tone of a paper. Generally I prefer to move straight into the thesis as I am not yet an established scholar, and the only audience I am addressing is my TA or professor. Your call...
2: Body In literature, this is usually the close reading of the text. In any case, it is where you bring evidence to support your thesis. Given that this is a game, you would need to focus on specific game play mechanics or behaviors which support your thesis.
3: Refutation If a thesis were water tight, there would be no reason to make an argument; hence no real reason to write a paper. Here you consider opinions counter to your thesis. After elaborating the alternate position, you would then reaffirm why your stance is the preferred one.
4: Conclusion Here you reiterate your thesis. Not only that, but it is here you deliver the thrust of your argument, that quotable which will stick in the minds of readers, and inform future scholars for years to come.
I wish you luck in your endeavours, and I hope that you consider my critique. A better writing style would make you more comprehensible, and engage other readers in a more productive way. Alas, I was unable to understand what it is you wished to communicate, and must label this thread a failure.
The onus of communication rests upon your shoulders, and yours alone; lest you sink into incomprehensibility and idiocy.
Fly safe. "It's funny the things you people think are mandatory for us, as if we don't do what we do because it's a hilarious good time in a space video game." - Johnny Marzetti
|
|

Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
457
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:27:00 -
[41] - Quote
Caviar Liberta wrote:Just checked and nobody has asked yet. Can I have your stuff?
I'd say that since I expressed the first postive response to her post, that I am first in line. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Jarod Garamonde
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
1648
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:27:00 -
[42] - Quote
Caviar Liberta wrote:Just checked and nobody has asked yet. Can I have your stuff?
I got all the way down to the second-to-last post.... my hopes were up, then dashed, with the end in sight....
(PS: for those who are wondering, "I can haz your stuff" DOES work, sometimes..... in fact, that's actually how I came to own this wonderful olive green Sterling Dress Shirt I'm currently sporting) That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right... |

Sacu Shi
Apex Industries Lynchpin Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere
27
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:28:00 -
[43] - Quote
" Balls? Who want's those things. they are soft and easily hurt...You wanna grow a vagina. Those things can take a pounding..."
- Mae West |

350125GO
Transcendent Sedition Dustm3n
37
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:31:00 -
[44] - Quote
Null sec changed when sovereignty was introduced. IIRC there weren't coalitions before it, and it has led to what we have today. When you consider that most of null is empty, the OP has a point. Something needs to be done to change this mechanic. Even one of the top goons (sorry I don't remember who or where he wrote it) stated the SOV mechanics led to the GFC, and their domination, and as a result, null is somewhat boring.
WHs are currently operating the way null would in an ideal situation. Nobody's really blue to anyone else, ppl show up, if there's targets they engage. Evictions happen because someone wants to occupy your space and set up base in it, not because they're trying to set up SOV in your constellation. There are cases were evictions happen because someone's decided to be a tool, but most of the time it's because someone else wants to live in the hole you're living in.
I'd be back in null if it was possible for a small alliance, or even corps to own a system without having to rely on being part of a greater coalition. I miss the days of the SOV map having many many colors. |

Xen Solarus
Inner 5phere
844
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:33:00 -
[45] - Quote
Going on about people having no balls, whilst posting on an alt?
Priceless! Post with your main, like a BOSS! |

Willmahh
25
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:41:00 -
[46] - Quote
General Nusense wrote:Willmahh wrote:it seems you left your balls on your main... oh look an edgy "post with your main" post. try playing the game for longer than 10 months before you post. kthx.
not sure what that means...but... mkay? |

Dalto Bane
Black Swarm Locust
89
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 19:43:00 -
[47] - Quote
Willmahh wrote:it seems you left your balls on your main...
This^
Though I would Love to see a some hero rally a crazed group of pvp'ers in a fight against the Null Blocs of Eden, the fact remains that until power projection is limited and Sov is fixed, its nearly impossible to withstand any long term war with a group that can replace capitals faster than you can destroy them. Besides, they really are not the bad guys, they are just the other guys. Dalto Bane for CSM10- Getting an early start. -á-My posts are my platform
|

WASPY69
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
249
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 20:06:00 -
[48] - Quote
Soul Asassin wrote:null sec becoming nothing but a wasteland of trash, idiots, morons with alts
Soul Asassin wrote:I was always a deep null sec inhabitant with my alts.
My reaction when reading the OP. :frogout: |

Soul Asassin
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 20:06:00 -
[49] - Quote
I am so much enjoying people coming up with the most wasteful crap ever. If you want to actually comment, try commenting with some intelligence. Most of you clearly are the renting pets, paying for the renter systems, "pathetic". If your commenting on contrary to the post, your clearly and big bloc bunny boy.
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15221
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 20:08:00 -
[50] - Quote
"Big Bloc Bunny Boy" sounds like a pretty good sexname "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |
|

Soul Asassin
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 20:10:00 -
[51] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:"Big Bloc Bunny Boy" sounds like a pretty good sexname
Yeh, sounds kinky doesn't it. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15221
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 20:10:00 -
[52] - Quote
Agreed. Thread redeemed. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Baaldor
In Igne Morim
244
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 20:14:00 -
[53] - Quote
Posting in a cleverly veiled :goatse: / :pedobear: thread.
|

Anslo
Scope Works
4907
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 20:22:00 -
[54] - Quote
Belt Scout wrote:Tl;Dr overhaul nullsec mechanics.  ftfy
|

Baneken
Arctic Light Inc. Arctic Light
239
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 20:23:00 -
[55] - Quote
Problem with sov mechanics is the way they favour capital- and especially super cap -blops and it's too late to change anything. Other problem is simply size when other side has numbers in 10K's it doesn't really matter how you arrange the sov mechanics. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1204

|
Posted - 2014.04.25 20:38:00 -
[56] - Quote
Thread closed for ranting. Please refrain from it in the future.
The Rules: 3. Ranting is prohibited.
A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |