EVE Search - Vigilant

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Vigilant

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Angus McLean Militia Federation 1	Posted - 2014.05.20 19:34:00 - [1] - Quote Can someone provide me with a viable, perhaps even cookie cutter, Vigilant setup? I recently acquired one semi by accident, and prior to owning it I had never planned on using it. Now that I have it, there's not much reason to sell it though, and I'm capable of fielding all the necessary equipment to fly it. So why not? I have been testing fits with Neutron Blaster II's, but I've also been wondering if Railguns are the way to go as it has a range bonus and damage bonus? My neutron fit is as follows: 5x Neutron II's 10mn MWD II Warp Disruptor II Fed Navy Webifier Fed Navy Webifier (possibly switch for Small Cap Booster II w/Navy 400's?) DCU II 2x EANM II 2x Mag Stab II 1600mm Tungsten Plate 3x Trimark Is this a normal fit? Or should I active tank/nano/rail fit it somehow?
Shpenat Galactic Exploration and Mining Corporation The Obsidian Front 68	Posted - 2014.05.20 19:51:00 - [2] - Quote Angus McLean wrote: My neutron fit is as follows: 5x Neutron II's 10mn MWD II Warp Disruptor II Fed Navy Webifier Fed Navy Webifier (possibly switch for Small Cap Booster II w/Navy 400's?) DCU II 2x EANM II 2x Mag Stab II 1600mm Tungsten Plate 3x Trimark Is this a normal fit? Or should I active tank/nano/rail fit it somehow? This used to be pretty standard neutron fit. However the vigilant is losing some of ot PG in the next expansion so you will not be able to fit T2 MWD + 1600mm plate + neutrons. Unfortunately I am unable to provide any reasonable fit right now.
Wacktopia Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group 639	Posted - 2014.05.20 22:22:00 - [3] - Quote Shpenat wrote: This used to be pretty standard neutron fit. However the vigilant is losing some of its PG in the next expansion so you will not be able to fit T2 MWD + 1600mm plate + neutrons. Unfortunately I am unable to provide any reasonable fit right now. EDIT: typos Vigilant is losing some PG but gaining speed and lock range. Interesting changes :) https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=335364 -// Public Fleets: http://fleet-up.com/Operation/Public //-
Blodhgarm Dethahal Transcendent Sedition Protean Concept 137	Posted - 2014.05.21 04:08:00 - [4] - Quote Step 1.. put three webs and some good resists on it Step 2.. get an Archon Step 3.. get blap Dread Step 4.. laugh That being said the Vigilant makes an excelent heavy tackle boat for gangs.. -Bl+¦d http://bloodytravels.blogspot.com/ -á-- My travels through space.
Dub Step Death To Everyone But Us 136	Posted - 2014.05.21 04:13:00 - [5] - Quote Use the fit you suggested and lose it before the patch, then try something new and fun once it changes.... could be fun hull tanking it after hull rigs are introduced.
Luwc Biohazard. WINMATAR. 133	Posted - 2014.05.21 07:08:00 - [6] - Quote Angus McLean wrote: Can someone provide me with a viable, perhaps even cookie cutter, Vigilant setup? I recently acquired one semi by accident, and prior to owning it I had never planned on using it. Now that I have it, there's not much reason to sell it though, and I'm capable of fielding all the necessary equipment to fly it. So why not? I have been testing fits with Neutron Blaster II's, but I've also been wondering if Railguns are the way to go as it has a range bonus and damage bonus? My neutron fit is as follows: 5x Neutron II's 10mn MWD II Warp Disruptor II Fed Navy Webifier Fed Navy Webifier (possibly switch for Small Cap Booster II w/Navy 400's?) DCU II 2x EANM II 2x Mag Stab II 1600mm Tungsten Plate 3x Trimark Is this a normal fit? Or should I active tank/nano/rail fit it somehow? downgrade to a meta MWD. http://hugelolcdn.com/i/267520.gif
Dorian Tormak Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic 142	Posted - 2014.05.21 07:40:00 - [7] - Quote Looks like a pretty standard setup. Check this one out, I really wanna fit this out in game but am not specced for medium rails at the moment and haven't really been playing much lately. I so badly wanna try this though Damage Control II Medium Ancillary Armor Repairer Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Centii C-Type Adaptive Nano Plating Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Gistum B-Type 10MN Microwarpdrive Domination Warp Disruptor Federation Navy Stasis Webifier Medium Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I, Navy Cap Booster 800 250mm Railgun II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M 250mm Railgun II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M 250mm Railgun II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M 250mm Railgun II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M 250mm Railgun II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Medium Auxiliary Nano Pump I Medium Polycarbon Engine Housing I Medium Polycarbon Engine Housing I Warrior II x5 Setup does 787 overheated DPS Goes 2084 MS 234 EFT "tank", 299 overloaded. 18km optimal, 23 km falloff. Was playing with shield tanked Vigis but I feel like it can't get a good enough shield tank going. This setup has a decent tank, great speed and huge damage and range. "Nothing is more surprising than the easiness with which the many are governed by the few." David Hume
Grimpak Shifting Sands Trader Cartel Bleak Horizon Alliance. 1525	Posted - 2014.05.21 08:11:00 - [8] - Quote Shpenat wrote: Angus McLean wrote: My neutron fit is as follows: 5x Neutron II's 10mn MWD II Warp Disruptor II Fed Navy Webifier Fed Navy Webifier (possibly switch for Small Cap Booster II w/Navy 400's?) DCU II 2x EANM II 2x Mag Stab II 1600mm Tungsten Plate 3x Trimark Is this a normal fit? Or should I active tank/nano/rail fit it somehow? This used to be pretty standard neutron fit. However the vigilant is losing some of its PG in the next expansion so you will not be able to fit T2 MWD + 1600mm plate + neutrons. Unfortunately I am unable to provide any reasonable fit right now. EDIT: typos hmm... maybe use same fit but replace 1600 for 800? not spectacular, but not bad either. [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img] [quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right
Garviel Tarrant Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel 2143	Posted - 2014.05.21 09:04:00 - [9] - Quote could probably just downgrade a couple of neutrons to ions.. BYDI recruitment closed-ish
Lloyd Roses Blue-Fire 595	Posted - 2014.05.21 10:38:00 - [10] - Quote If you're not running rails and with a CB, you're doing something very wrong. Also, you don't need much pimp on a vigilant, get a navy web and you're settled. [Vigilant, rails] Fourier Transform Tracking Program Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Internal Force Field Array I Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Medium Ancillary Armor Repairer Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I Warp Disruptor II Federation Navy Stasis Webifier Medium Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I 250mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge M 250mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge M 250mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge M 250mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge M 250mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge M Medium Polycarbon Engine Housing I Medium Hybrid Metastasis Adjuster I Medium Hybrid Metastasis Adjuster II This already got all the pimp you need. The rest is mainly throwing money out of the window. "I honestly thought I was in lowsec"

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.