Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
HarlyQ
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 04:33:17 -
[181] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Reaver Glitterstim wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Xenuria wrote:....few people would disagree with my goal to reform the way in which the CSM functions. I agree there is something wrong that null sec holds the majority of CSM seats. This is the first time I have noticed your thread. Although ... your methods are ... interesting. Here is a bump. At least we agree there is something wrong with the voting mechanism. I think you're both getting hung up on where the candidates came from and failing to notice that the nullsec candidates have been remarkably reliable in advocating changes all over EVE. There is clearly no great conspiracy here, and few of the nullsec candidates including none of the ones anybody including the CSM takes seriously are even pushing for changes that would directly benefit anyone in nullsec. Furthermore, even if the nullsec candidates were ruthless and were taking the seats only for self/blue-serving reasons, they still would be advocating changes that would help their own specific nullsec group while trying to hurt another specific nullsec group, without caring who outside of nullsec is affected in what way. One thing is doubly certain: the nullsec candidates are no enemy to anyone outside of nullsec--unless you consider Providence to not be nullsec. At no point did I question the work done by these candidates. I retain however that the system in it's present form is unfair. Why is it unfair?
Is it because you are not getting elected? |
HarlyQ
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 04:39:35 -
[182] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Reaver Glitterstim wrote:You posit that it is unfair and you back it up with speculation. Well statistics say it is fair. The happiness of the EVE playerbase with the CSM shows it is fair. The effectiveness of the CSM and the diversity in their moves show it is fair.
Your logic is not flawed. What is flawed is your perception of the way other people think. There is definitely room for people to take advantage of the CSM in a bad way, it is very much a theoretical possibility. But it hasn't happened yet and apparently isn't about to. You're wasting your breath trying to fight a theoretical menace when, statistically speaking, you getting your way is more likely to cause a negative disturbance than a positive one, even if the net potential for disruption is reduced. I have cited my sources, please cite yours. ChYph3r wrote:Xenuria wrote: At no point did I question the work done by these candidates. I retain however that the system in it's present form is unfair.
Then shouldn't you take this up with the developer. As they are the ones who construed this way of doing the votes. Being on the CSM cant fix that. As the CSM do not fix anything. Actually the CSM whitepaper is something the CSM works WITH devs to change and adapt. It is after all a living document. I recommend you read the OP (Original Post) for more information. You cited you're sources but never showed evidence so I still think you are blowing smoke. Hey look guys another read the original post comment how original. |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2260
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 06:35:03 -
[183] - Quote
HarlyQ wrote:Xenuria wrote:I have cited my sources, please cite yours. You cited you're sources but never showed evidence so I still think you are blowing smoke. Xenuria, you may have cited sources for other information not related to the topic, but I was pointing out that your logic is flawed. There are no sources to cite for that except yourself, unless you have borrowed the logic from someone else that I'm not aware of.
I'm trying to help you see why you're flailing, and help you improve your presentation quality, and you are treating me as an opponent to be won against in a contest of writing command and knowledge of esoteric rules of convention.
ChYph3r wrote:Then shouldn't you take this up with the developer. As they are the ones who construed this way of doing the votes. Being on the CSM cant fix that. As the CSM do not fix anything. The entire purpose of the CSM is to help CCP hear the voices of the playerbase. The CSM is in fact the best place to go for CSM reform.
CSM X: Sabriz Adoudel, Mike Azariah, Sugar Kyle
|
Swanky nutjob
The Scope Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 11:38:03 -
[184] - Quote
It's clearly unfair because the fast swathes of unwashed hisec dwellers chose not to vote. |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1811
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 19:00:17 -
[185] - Quote
I would like every CSM candidate to confirm (or reject) support of the idea of applying the following statement to all future proposed changes to EvE mechanics:
"If the proposed change to game mechanics is expected to reduce conflict, it should be rejected. If the proposed change will increase conflict, it should be embraced"
Simple yes or no, without equivocation or weasel words. With that one answer voters can have revealed to them who will truly protect the sandbox, and who will let one slip past the goalie one day and harm it.
Xenuria?
F
Would you like to know more?
|
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1721
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 19:06:02 -
[186] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:I would like every CSM candidate to confirm (or reject) support of the idea of applying the following statement to all future proposed changes to EvE mechanics:
"If the proposed change to game mechanics is expected to reduce conflict, it should be rejected. If the proposed change will increase conflict, it should be embraced"
Simple yes or no, without equivocation or weasel words. With that one answer voters can have revealed to them who will truly protect the sandbox, and who will let one slip past the goalie one day and harm it.
Xenuria?
F that statement is silly, what about "you mut rack up X killmails per day or your character is deleted", should we embrace that? |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1813
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 21:22:27 -
[187] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote:Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:I would like every CSM candidate to confirm (or reject) support of the idea of applying the following statement to all future proposed changes to EvE mechanics:
"If the proposed change to game mechanics is expected to reduce conflict, it should be rejected. If the proposed change will increase conflict, it should be embraced"
Simple yes or no, without equivocation or weasel words. With that one answer voters can have revealed to them who will truly protect the sandbox, and who will let one slip past the goalie one day and harm it.
Xenuria?
F that statement is silly, what about "you mut rack up X killmails per day or your character is deleted", should we embrace that? Bad red-herring is bad...
I'd actually like to hear from Xenuria himself on the spirit of the question though, if thats ok with you? (Unless your his campaign manager and I didn't get the memo?)
F
Would you like to know more?
|
Xenuria
Tackled In Belt xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
981
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 21:26:45 -
[188] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:I would like every CSM candidate to confirm (or reject) support of the idea of applying the following statement to all future proposed changes to EvE mechanics:
"If the proposed change to game mechanics is expected to reduce conflict, it should be rejected. If the proposed change will increase conflict, it should be embraced"
Simple yes or no, without equivocation or weasel words. With that one answer voters can have revealed to them who will truly protect the sandbox, and who will let one slip past the goalie one day and harm it.
Xenuria?
F No I reject the idea and here is why.
Conflict in EvE is a GOOD thing but absolutes in the flow of gameplay mechanics is a BAD thing. No single mantra or conceptual ideal should shackle the collective creativity of the entire process. Absolutes are dangerous because they are void of context by their definition. EvE and it's process is a garden of context.
Silly Example: Would giving players the ability to instantly teleport their ships to any system provide conflict? YES, it would provide a gratuitous amount of conflict. Is it a good idea? NO
Reaver Glitterstim wrote: Xenuria, you may have cited sources for other information not related to the topic, but I was pointing out that your logic is flawed. There are no sources to cite for that except yourself, unless you have borrowed the logic from someone else that I'm not aware of.
I'm trying to help you see why you're flailing, and help you improve your presentation quality, and you are treating me as an opponent to be won against in a contest of writing command and knowledge of esoteric rules of convention.
I do not see you as an opponent. Please list in specifics which sources I have not cited or which statements I have claimed to be factual and did not provide proper citation.
CSM 10 Candidate
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2263
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 22:49:41 -
[189] - Quote
Xenuria wrote: Silly Example: Would giving players the ability to instantly teleport their ships to any system provide conflict? YES, it would provide a gratuitous amount of conflict. Is it a good idea? NO
Actually it would reduce conflict, as people would be more afraid to undock.
Xenuria wrote:I do not see you as an opponent. Please list in specifics which sources I have not cited or which statements I have claimed to be factual and did not provide proper citation. What is the importance of who cited what sources? Any sources you have cited demonstrate nothing to support your points, if valid they are outside the scope of your presentation. And what sources do you wish for me to provide? Are there factual bits I've given that you wish to dispute? Point them out and I'll see what I can do.
CSM X: Sabriz Adoudel, Mike Azariah, Sugar Kyle
|
Xenuria
Tackled In Belt xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
981
|
Posted - 2015.01.21 22:59:38 -
[190] - Quote
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:Xenuria wrote:I do not see you as an opponent. Please list in specifics which sources I have not cited or which statements I have claimed to be factual and did not provide proper citation. What is the importance of who cited what sources? Any sources you have cited demonstrate nothing to support your points, if valid they are outside the scope of your presentation. And what sources do you wish for me to provide? Are there factual bits I've given that you wish to dispute? Point them out and I'll see what I can do.
I wish I could empty quote this. I really can't take your criticisms seriously if you have no intention of standing by them when challenged.
CSM 10 Candidate
|
|
ChYph3r
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
150
|
Posted - 2015.01.22 00:44:54 -
[191] - Quote
Alphea Abbra wrote:This would be way more credible if you hadn't questioned their work before, and if you understood the election system.
So, people vote for the candidates they like, and do not vote for you. You say that's a problem with the election system, I say it fulfils the purpose. If your ego can't handle that people discard you for a joke candidate, you could stop being a joke candidate. In your case, I think it's easier to strike the candidate part than the joke part, though, so good luck.
Wow, well said!
Want to find all the podcasts around EVE Online visit
http://evepodcasts.com
@chyph3r on Twitter
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2270
|
Posted - 2015.01.22 00:46:29 -
[192] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Reaver Glitterstim wrote:And what sources do you wish for me to provide? Are there factual bits I've given that you wish to dispute? Point them out and I'll see what I can do. I wish I could empty quote this. I really can't take your criticisms seriously if you have no intention of standing by them when challenged. Not empty quoting.
CSM X: Sabriz Adoudel, Mike Azariah, Sugar Kyle
|
Dradis Aulmais
By Light and Banner's Fallen
647
|
Posted - 2015.01.22 02:40:49 -
[193] - Quote
I will vote for you only because I know your lonely deep inside.
CSM 10: Mike Azariah, Sugar Kyle
|
Nostromo Fidanza
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2015.01.23 20:44:45 -
[194] - Quote
HarlyQ wrote:Xenuria wrote:Reaver Glitterstim wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Xenuria wrote:....few people would disagree with my goal to reform the way in which the CSM functions. I agree there is something wrong that null sec holds the majority of CSM seats. This is the first time I have noticed your thread. Although ... your methods are ... interesting. Here is a bump. At least we agree there is something wrong with the voting mechanism. I think you're both getting hung up on where the candidates came from and failing to notice that the nullsec candidates have been remarkably reliable in advocating changes all over EVE. There is clearly no great conspiracy here, and few of the nullsec candidates including none of the ones anybody including the CSM takes seriously are even pushing for changes that would directly benefit anyone in nullsec. Furthermore, even if the nullsec candidates were ruthless and were taking the seats only for self/blue-serving reasons, they still would be advocating changes that would help their own specific nullsec group while trying to hurt another specific nullsec group, without caring who outside of nullsec is affected in what way. One thing is doubly certain: the nullsec candidates are no enemy to anyone outside of nullsec--unless you consider Providence to not be nullsec. At no point did I question the work done by these candidates. I retain however that the system in it's present form is unfair. Why is it unfair? Is it because you are not getting elected?
Ding. We have a winner. People play the "not fair" card when the have nothing. Guy has nothing. Get back to WoW. |
Xenuria
Tackled In Belt xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
981
|
Posted - 2015.01.23 22:00:22 -
[195] - Quote
Nostromo Fidanza wrote:
Ding. We have a winner. People play the "not fair" card when the have nothing. Guy has nothing. Get back to WoW.
I haven't played WoW in years and when I did I lead the largest guild in the history of the game. If you really feel I have "nothing" than why bother posting here?
CSM 10 Candidate
|
HarlyQ
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2015.01.23 22:08:15 -
[196] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Nostromo Fidanza wrote:
Ding. We have a winner. People play the "not fair" card when the have nothing. Guy has nothing. Get back to WoW.
I haven't played WoW in years and when I did I lead the largest guild in the history of the game. If you really feel I have "nothing" than why bother posting here? Because we are showing people how bad you would be for CSM.I mean just go read page 1 and 2 alone you don't even understand the voting mechanism but you say the whole thing is rigged or broken. If you don't understand how it works and you are not getting voted on of course you think it's broken.
I don't think just saying a ccp employee gave me this info is evidence of anything. You need to show it or no one believes you.
Also this wow group you lead got proof or Is it more smoke and mirrors type posting. |
Tyrant Scorn
182
|
Posted - 2015.01.23 23:58:05 -
[197] - Quote
Your campaign post is really short and limited, being someone who did CSM interviews for CSM9 I've been able to get a better perspective on the process and the internal workings in the CSM and I just have to disagree with a lot of what you say.
Secondly, I know your name from somewhere but I just can't remember from what.
It would be very nice to write up a bit of background information about yourself, what you do in Eve Online, are you active in the Meta game, what is your current ingame activity... Just basic information...
I am not voting for someone who is a blank person, I would like to know a bit more about you.
Host at Legacy Of A Capsuleer Podcast
www.legacyofacapsuleer.com
|
Tyrant Scorn
182
|
Posted - 2015.01.24 00:03:06 -
[198] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:I haven't played WoW in years and when I did I lead the largest guild in the history of the game.
Look, if you're gonna brag about how big your pen*s is, let me just say that I don't really care, no one really cares.
I think this alpha male crap is bad for your campaign, if people make childish comments about WoW or what ever else they throw at you, you should just let them be.
The better man knows when to not respond to such childish comments.
Host at Legacy Of A Capsuleer Podcast
www.legacyofacapsuleer.com
|
Xenuria
Tackled In Belt xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
981
|
Posted - 2015.01.24 00:26:06 -
[199] - Quote
HarlyQ wrote:Xenuria wrote:Nostromo Fidanza wrote:
Ding. We have a winner. People play the "not fair" card when the have nothing. Guy has nothing. Get back to WoW.
I haven't played WoW in years and when I did I lead the largest guild in the history of the game. If you really feel I have "nothing" than why bother posting here? Because we are showing people how bad you would be for CSM.I mean just go read page 1 and 2 alone you don't even understand the voting mechanism but you say the whole thing is rigged or broken. If you don't understand how it works and you are not getting voted on of course you think it's broken. I don't think just saying a ccp employee gave me this info is evidence of anything. You need to show it or no one believes you. Also this wow group you lead got proof or Is it more smoke and mirrors type posting.
Well to be fair the CCP employee didn't give ME the info, he was interviewed by several gaming news sites wherein he in his own words stated these numbers. I am sorry but if the word of a CCP employee is not enough for you than I can't help you.
In reference to "Servants of Xenu" I think a simple google search would clear up any "smoke and mirrors". The best advice I can give you at this point is to google search or do some basic background on what you want to say before you say it.
CSM 10 Candidate
|
HarlyQ
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2015.01.24 02:32:23 -
[200] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:HarlyQ wrote:Xenuria wrote:Nostromo Fidanza wrote:
Ding. We have a winner. People play the "not fair" card when the have nothing. Guy has nothing. Get back to WoW.
I haven't played WoW in years and when I did I lead the largest guild in the history of the game. If you really feel I have "nothing" than why bother posting here? Because we are showing people how bad you would be for CSM.I mean just go read page 1 and 2 alone you don't even understand the voting mechanism but you say the whole thing is rigged or broken. If you don't understand how it works and you are not getting voted on of course you think it's broken. I don't think just saying a ccp employee gave me this info is evidence of anything. You need to show it or no one believes you. Also this wow group you lead got proof or Is it more smoke and mirrors type posting. Well to be fair the CCP employee didn't give ME the info, he was interviewed by several gaming news sites wherein he in his own words stated these numbers. I am sorry but if the word of a CCP employee is not enough for you than I can't help you. In reference to "Servants of Xenu" I think a simple google search would clear up any "smoke and mirrors". The best advice I can give you at this point is to google search or do some basic background on what you want to say before you say it. Hey look at that he finally cited sources well kinda he did tell me to do a Google search on some wow pubbies I think we are getting through to him. But how do we know it's you that lead said wow pubbies? Btw I'm not ruining my search history by looking up wow scrubs. |
|
Tyrant Scorn
182
|
Posted - 2015.01.24 07:22:23 -
[201] - Quote
I've listened to your interview on Cap Stable and I was stunned by the amount of trouble you were envolved in. To be fair, how can you ask people to trust you after all that stuff ?
Host at Legacy Of A Capsuleer Podcast
www.legacyofacapsuleer.com
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2285
|
Posted - 2015.01.24 10:32:19 -
[202] - Quote
HarlyQ wrote:But how do we know it's you that lead said wow pubbies? Btw I'm not ruining my search history by looking up wow scrubs. I play WoW so I'm not afraid. I did a check, here is what I found:
Largest guild in WoW currently: Alea Iacta Est (Earthen Ring) - over 9000 members (so they claim)
Largest guild in WoW of all time: No available info I can find
Servants of Xenu: OldSmeller has a Wowhead bit claiming to be its CEO [sic] and also that the guild is "currently the single largest corporate body on the entire storm strike battle group" (no date for statement). I can find no evidence of any significance to the guild.
Interesting bit of trivia: WoW players do not compare their guilds to corporations nor use any corporate terms to describe guild activities. WoW guilds are very non-corporate, and the players do not refer to guild masters as CEO. Any guild in WoW pushing itself as corporate in style would be very eccentric from the mainstream guilds, and likely not very popular. Source: I've played a lot of WoW during TBC and WotLK, and still play it from time to time even today.
CSM X: Sabriz Adoudel, Mike Azariah, Sugar Kyle, Corbexx
|
Xenuria
Tackled In Belt xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
981
|
Posted - 2015.01.24 14:21:33 -
[203] - Quote
Tyrant Scorn wrote:I've listened to your interview on Cap Stable and I was stunned by the amount of trouble you were envolved in. To be fair, how can you ask people to trust you after all that stuff ?
I wasn't involved in any of it. When the monument was vandalized I was not even in the country. The interviewer mis-identified me as the person who leaked APIs and as I said in that recorded, that wasn't me.
Perhaps you should listen to the interview again.
CSM 10 Candidate
|
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1726
|
Posted - 2015.01.24 15:31:13 -
[204] - Quote
Okay, lets ignore all the bullshit and long past incidences for a while.
Answer me this Xenuria, as most CSM members are either very active forum goers who contribute to MANY discussions, or politcally savvy and well-followed ingame players, why should I vote for you, when I rarely hear of you ingame doing much of anything until its mentioned perhaps offhand long after the incident, and as far as January is concerned you havent really posted outside of your own CSM candicacy thread?
You just dont seem very active within the community in any leadership/significant role, ingame or forums, and a CSM member should be somebody whos not only an enabler, someone who allows/makes things happen, but somebody others WANT to talk to, and frankly, I cant really think of alot of people who would consider YOU in their top 10 of "people I/they could go to for help" |
Xenuria
Tackled In Belt xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
981
|
Posted - 2015.01.24 16:13:40 -
[205] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote:Okay, lets ignore all the bullshit and long past incidences for a while.
Answer me this Xenuria, as most CSM members are either very active forum goers who contribute to MANY discussions, or politcally savvy and well-followed ingame players, why should I vote for you, when I rarely hear of you ingame doing much of anything until its mentioned perhaps offhand long after the incident, and as far as January is concerned you havent really posted outside of your own CSM candicacy thread?
You just dont seem very active within the community in any leadership/significant role, ingame or forums, and a CSM member should be somebody whos not only an enabler, someone who allows/makes things happen, but somebody others WANT to talk to, and frankly, I cant really think of alot of people who would consider YOU in their top 10 of "people I/they could go to for help"
Did you have a question? I am not being snide, I just see a long statement ended with a "?". If you have a specific question I will answer it.
CSM 10 Candidate
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2286
|
Posted - 2015.01.24 18:28:24 -
[206] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote:why should I vote for you, Did you have a question? I am not being snide, I just see a long statement ended with a "?". If you have a specific question I will answer it. shortened to reveal the question
CSM X: Sabriz Adoudel, Mike Azariah, Sugar Kyle, Corbexx
|
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1728
|
Posted - 2015.01.24 18:44:58 -
[207] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote:Okay, lets ignore all the bullshit and long past incidences for a while.
Answer me this Xenuria, as most CSM members are either very active forum goers who contribute to MANY discussions, or politcally savvy and well-followed ingame players, why should I vote for you, when I rarely hear of you ingame doing much of anything until its mentioned perhaps offhand long after the incident, and as far as January is concerned you havent really posted outside of your own CSM candicacy thread?
You just dont seem very active within the community in any leadership/significant role, ingame or forums, and a CSM member should be somebody whos not only an enabler, someone who allows/makes things happen, but somebody others WANT to talk to, and frankly, I cant really think of alot of people who would consider YOU in their top 10 of "people I/they could go to for help" Did you have a question? I am not being snide, I just see a long statement ended with a "?". If you have a specific question I will answer it. Basically, why do you feel qualified, or that youll bring player's interests to the board, as a member of the CSM, when you do not, or rarely, participate in the community you wish to represent.
basically, If you want my vote, I want a good reason why I should when I hardly ever see you join in on community discussions, or even just the standard "shitpost" thread, your never there, as evident of your forum history in the month of january youve not really posted outside this thread at all.
Your not an "active" member of this community, so why should you represent it? |
Xenuria
Tackled In Belt xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
983
|
Posted - 2015.01.24 19:14:32 -
[208] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote:Xenuria wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote:Okay, lets ignore all the bullshit and long past incidences for a while.
Answer me this Xenuria, as most CSM members are either very active forum goers who contribute to MANY discussions, or politcally savvy and well-followed ingame players, why should I vote for you, when I rarely hear of you ingame doing much of anything until its mentioned perhaps offhand long after the incident, and as far as January is concerned you havent really posted outside of your own CSM candicacy thread?
You just dont seem very active within the community in any leadership/significant role, ingame or forums, and a CSM member should be somebody whos not only an enabler, someone who allows/makes things happen, but somebody others WANT to talk to, and frankly, I cant really think of alot of people who would consider YOU in their top 10 of "people I/they could go to for help" Did you have a question? I am not being snide, I just see a long statement ended with a "?". If you have a specific question I will answer it. Basically, why do you feel qualified, or that youll bring player's interests to the board, as a member of the CSM, when you do not, or rarely, participate in the community you wish to represent. basically, If you want my vote, I want a good reason why I should when I hardly ever see you join in on community discussions, or even just the standard "shitpost" thread, your never there, as evident of your forum history in the month of January youve not really posted outside this thread at all. Your not an "active" member of this community, so why should you represent it?
I am an active member of the community, the EvE Online Official forums are not the only place players share their ideas. I regularly convo and chat publicly with my constituency in EvE Online.
CSM 10 Candidate
|
Tyrant Scorn
183
|
Posted - 2015.01.25 00:29:19 -
[209] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Tyrant Scorn wrote:I've listened to your interview on Cap Stable and I was stunned by the amount of trouble you were envolved in. To be fair, how can you ask people to trust you after all that stuff ? I wasn't involved in any of it. When the monument was vandalized I was not even in the country. The interviewer mis-identified me as the person who leaked APIs and as I said in that recorded, that wasn't me. Perhaps you should listen to the interview again.
Maybe you should chill and understand peoples concerns. Your name comes up in multiple things and non of which are taken lightly when it comes to trusting someone.
Your attitude just sucks... Sorry if that hurts your feelings but you seem to have an arrogance about you... you vibe wrong, your aura is the wrong color... take your pick.
Host at Legacy Of A Capsuleer Podcast
www.legacyofacapsuleer.com
|
Xenuria
Tackled In Belt xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
983
|
Posted - 2015.01.25 02:42:25 -
[210] - Quote
Tyrant Scorn wrote:Xenuria wrote:Tyrant Scorn wrote:I've listened to your interview on Cap Stable and I was stunned by the amount of trouble you were envolved in. To be fair, how can you ask people to trust you after all that stuff ? I wasn't involved in any of it. When the monument was vandalized I was not even in the country. The interviewer mis-identified me as the person who leaked APIs and as I said in that recorded, that wasn't me. Perhaps you should listen to the interview again. Maybe you should chill and understand peoples concerns. Your name comes up in multiple things and non of which are taken lightly when it comes to trusting someone. Your attitude just sucks... Sorry if that hurts your feelings but you seem to have an arrogance about you... you vibe wrong, your aura is the wrong color... take your pick.
I am sorry if I offended you, I have unfortunately become accustomed to people falsely accusing me of stuff. It's a sore subject for me.
CSM 10 Candidate
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |