Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Corraidhin Farsaidh
Hello-There
513
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:50:00 -
[31] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:Oh look it's this thread again in which the following will happen.
1. Side one: AFK Cloaking is bad. 2. Side 2: No it's not, you're just terrible at Eve. 3. Side 1: No U! 4. Side 2: LOL NEWB, U R TEH SUXORS.
It's an argument that has never, in my 6 years of playing, come to any kind of resolution that doesn't devolve into children on a playground with their fingers in their ears.
We may as well debate gun control, abortion, or the death penalty. We'll get just as much accompolished.
Maybe any AFK cloaking thread should only be active when the OP is ATK... |

Bland Inquisitor
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
34
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:51:00 -
[32] - Quote
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Oh look it's this thread again in which the following will happen.
1. Side one: AFK Cloaking is bad. 2. Side 2: No it's not, you're just terrible at Eve. 3. Side 1: No U! 4. Side 2: LOL NEWB, U R TEH SUXORS.
It's an argument that has never, in my 6 years of playing, come to any kind of resolution that doesn't devolve into children on a playground with their fingers in their ears.
We may as well debate gun control, abortion, or the death penalty. We'll get just as much accompolished. Maybe any AFK cloaking thread should only be active when the OP is ATK...
That is not an issue with me, I'm always at keyboard :) |

w3ak3stl1nk
Hedion University Amarr Empire
47
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 19:57:00 -
[33] - Quote
Is null supposed to be safe? No risk high reward null sec? Null logic at its best here. AFK cloaking is just keeping people honest that pvp can happen. |

SurrenderMonkey
Space Llama Industries
724
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:00:00 -
[34] - Quote
Bland Inquisitor wrote:
They are already looking to nerf combat scanning, I want this to also include the internal scanner.
Yeah, let's just rework arbitrary (and ALREADY RECENTLY REWORKED) systems because stupid people can't be bothered to manage their own risk by not ratting in carriers. That makes sense.
Quote:To say that all carriers should die is plain stupid, You NEED a carrier to live in Null, why not allow it to double up as a ratting ship.
Holy entitled whining, Batman! You don't NEED a carrier, and you certainly don't NEED to rat in one. These are not requirements. Plenty of players get by without the aid of a carrier every day.
It is allowed to double up as a ratting ship and, when it does so, it paints a nice big target on itself, which is exactly as it should be.
There's absolutely ZERO reason why ANY game mechanic should be changed to facilitate carrier ratting. You have the right to do stupid things. You do not have the right to have the game changed to take the edge off of your own stupidity, though.
Manage your own ******* risk like everyone else. "Help, I'm bored with missions!"
http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Bland Inquisitor
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
34
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:08:00 -
[35] - Quote
your focusing on a narrow tangent. Carrier, battleship,t3 or cruiser. They all encounter the exact same problem. Its not a risk reward argument if its not a risk, its suicide.
People just don't rat and wait for them to get bored. All I'm saying is, why allow someone who isn't at the keyboard so much influence over a larger number of players who are actually active? |

Tek Handle
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
54
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:10:00 -
[36] - Quote
SurrenderMonkey wrote: There's also no reward for the AFK cloaker. Any reward incurred happens while he's actively playing the game and has to uncloak, thereby incurring the risk of being shot at.
This is bullshit and you know that. Cloaky camping the worthiest systems of an Nullsec entity is a common strategy to deny their income! So he or his party is of course being rewarded for being there w/o any risk. |

Cassandra Aurilien
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
148
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:13:00 -
[37] - Quote
Bland Inquisitor wrote:your focusing on a narrow tangent. Carrier, battleship,t3 or cruiser. They all encounter the exact same problem. Its not a risk reward argument if its not a risk, its suicide.
People just don't rat and wait for them to get bored. All I'm saying is, why allow someone who isn't at the keyboard so much influence over a larger number of players who are actually active?
The person who is giving them that influence is you.
Set a trap. Arrange a counter hot drop. You could have your fellow carrier ratters help out. |

SurrenderMonkey
Space Llama Industries
725
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:17:00 -
[38] - Quote
Bland Inquisitor wrote:your focusing on a narrow tangent. Carrier, battleship,t3 or cruiser. They all encounter the exact same problem. Its not a risk reward argument if its not a risk, its suicide.
Bull ****. On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everything that undocks eventually drops to 0. The only concern should be whether or not your isk-earning activities outpace your isk-losing activities.
Quote:People just don't rat and wait for them to get bored. All I'm saying is, why allow someone who isn't at the keyboard so much influence over a larger number of players who are actually active?
Personal problems, again. If they're so risk averse that they simply can't bring themselves to rat with a cloaker in the system, too ******* bad. The influence is completely self-inflicted. Nobody is preventing them from ignoring the AFK cloaker. They're CHOOSING to treat ANY risk as if it were insurmountable. "Help, I'm bored with missions!"
http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Bland Inquisitor
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
34
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:18:00 -
[39] - Quote
I don't anom rat, a lot of my alliance members do. Its the basic income for most nullsec alliance gunts. The cloakly camper is an impact on income. Do rat and inevitably lose ships, don't rat and lose out on income.
End of the day, being able to warp on top of people without scanning them down makes it far too easy. Forget combat scanning being too easy, you don't even require scanning skills for this. |

Willmahh
46
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:18:00 -
[40] - Quote
Eliminate local in NULL and you:
1. negate afk cloaking 2. negate tinfoil-hat ratters 3. create better SOV/NULL metagame 4. make sov holders actually post guards in their systems 5. negate threads like this |
|

Kaerakh
Surprisingly Deep Hole
226
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:34:00 -
[41] - Quote
Bland Inquisitor wrote:*OP addressing a controversial issue that clearly no one ever ever in the whole wided worldeded ever thought of before.*
An AFK cloaker has never killed a player. Therefore it's not a problem.
HTFU
Edit:
Willmahh wrote:Eliminate local in NULL and you:
1. negate afk cloaking 2. negate tinfoil-hat ratters 3. create better SOV/NULL metagame 4. make sov holders actually post guards in their systems 5. negate threads like this This^ (4 is naive, but everything else is true) |

Willmahh
49
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:37:00 -
[42] - Quote
Kaerakh wrote:Bland Inquisitor wrote:*OP addressing a controversial issue that clearly no one ever ever in the whole wided worldeded ever thought of before.* An AFK cloaker has never killed a player. Therefore it's not a problem. HTFU Edit: Willmahh wrote:Eliminate local in NULL and you:
1. negate afk cloaking 2. negate tinfoil-hat ratters 3. create better SOV/NULL metagame 4. make sov holders actually post guards in their systems 5. negate threads like this This^ (4 is naive, but everything else is true)
i always include a little naive in every good idea. its for balance. |

Zorrkinae vonHui
Gnostics of the Sense of Life
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:39:00 -
[43] - Quote
Bland Inquisitor wrote:Any AFK action that can positively or negatively impact other players should be removed from the game and prevented at all costs. I believe CCP agrees with this, they already made tweaks to OGB, now they need to fix AFK cloaking.
Side note, removing Local would be a good move too.
this sounds awefully wrong dude! be sure that no afk-cloaker ever has killed any of your friends ;D and removing local is just dumb^^ why should there not be an openforallchannel? I really don-¦t fancy with the idea to open an privatchat/newchannel for daily chatting with my surroundings^^ maybe they should remove combatprobes aswell cuz it-¦s to easy to find you?
I-¦d recommend to overthink your suggestions once again^^ "there are million ways to death, but only one way leads to life" |

Bland Inquisitor
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
34
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 20:55:00 -
[44] - Quote
Zorrkinae vonHui wrote: and removing local is just dumb^^ why should there not be an openforallchannel? I really don-¦t fancy with the idea to open an privatchat/newchannel for daily chatting with my surroundings^^ maybe they should remove combatprobes aswell cuz it-¦s to easy to find you?
I-¦d recommend to overthink your suggestions once again^^
Local was never intended as an instant intel channel. Note that regional chat exists but isnt used, Local provides you with an updated list of not only who is around but their standings to you. Intel on hostile entities based on chat channels is less than ideal for a game as advanced as EvE online.
Nobody that wants local removed is asking so because they dislike the chat channel, How it works in W-Space is a step in the right direction in regards to local, however its a poor game mechanic. Having to actually scan and find players would drastically improve gameplay.
|

Silvetica Dian
Manson Family Advent of Fate
1051
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:02:00 -
[45] - Quote
Bland Inquisitor wrote:SurrenderMonkey wrote:Bland Inquisitor wrote:
Just a single cloaked neut in Sov space system will deny that entire system from potentially 100's of pilots.
If 100s of pilots are afraid of one AFK guy, the only thing that is going to solve their problem is some nice low wholesale pricing on extra-absorbent Huggies. It takes 3 minutes for a ratting carrier to be killed by blops hotdrop. That is not enough time for a defense fleet to form, warp in and save the carrier. Even if they could, your talking about having to have an active defense fleet to combat and AFK threat. Why should somoene who isnt at his keyboard have so much power as to have 100 players be ready to counter a potential threat. In reality, AFK cloaking is imbalanced. You, can't even argue that if your aligned you can warp before being tackled from a deloaker, because the simple, yet effective tactic of moving infront of and bumping a target prior to tackling it. I'm all for risk and reward, this is all reward and no risk for the cloaker.
have you considered having cloaky eyes in the systems they will drop from? We cloaky camp some people and they stay docked all day. They tried doing it to us and we continue ratting as if they weren't there. If we need to know we log on cloaky eyes in their briding systems and have a look see. If we think they are going to hotdrop we form a counter drop fleet. ratting is too safe in null already. cloaky hot drops are the only thing that provides any risk for the average nullbear and this is somehow broken in favour of the hunters? Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85 |

Kaerakh
Surprisingly Deep Hole
226
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:11:00 -
[46] - Quote
Silvetica Dian wrote:
have you considered having cloaky eyes in the systems they will drop from? We cloaky camp some people and they stay docked all day. They tried doing it to us and we continue ratting as if they weren't there. If we need to know we log on cloaky eyes in their briding systems and have a look see. If we think they are going to hotdrop we form a counter drop fleet. ratting is too safe in null already. cloaky hot drops are the only thing that provides any risk for the average nullbear and this is somehow broken in favour of the hunters?
Wow, this guy is suggesting a proactive solution, imagine that. You'd think from all these AFK cloaking threads there was nothing they could do. Oh, that's right there's a whole lot of things they can do. They just won't lift a finger to save themselves.
Too bad nullbears will never consider it. They want nullsec to be highsec. Pure and simple, and wholly incompatible with how nullsec is intended to work. |

Gigan Amilupar
No Code of Conduct Fluffeh Bunneh Murder Squad
257
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:19:00 -
[47] - Quote
As promised. |

Mag's
the united
17297
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:20:00 -
[48] - Quote
Bland Inquisitor wrote:Bland Indeed.
Reported for redundancy and/or reopened thread.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Kaerakh
Surprisingly Deep Hole
228
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:39:00 -
[49] - Quote
That reminds me of my completely serious and opposing argument for these threads. Schrodinger's Hot Dropper |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
2777
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:45:00 -
[50] - Quote
Mmm. Yet more solutions to something that's not a problem. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruitng members for lowsec PvP operations. Newbie friendly, free T1 frigate and dessy hangar, solo tutoring and PvP classes for new members. Join our in game channel 'weflyrifters' and speak to a recruiter today. |
|

Bohneik Itohn
Periphery Bound
202
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:47:00 -
[51] - Quote
I just want to say that I, deep in my soul, truly feel a bit of sympathy for the people I have "cloaky camped" (finished cooking dinner in their system, or watched an episode of some demented anime, or whatever. BTW thanks to the guys from the Alliance in Syndicate whose name I can't remember for a spot on the couch while I watched the fanfest livestream, and I'm not including you in this criticism.).
Well, I would.... If they weren't so incapable that they couldn't check my Bio and my Corp to see that there was no chance of me hot-dropping them.
Seriously.... You're that bad at using this as an excuse.... Freyya:
Wait, CCP kills kittens now too?! |

Marsha Mallow
772
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 22:19:00 -
[52] - Quote
Chunk, have a look here and you'll see why afk cloaky proposals don't really generate constructive feedback. Or here for removing local (take note of the thread title). It's been done to death, you'll probably see your own ideas somewhere on those lists in another form.
Proposals like this tend to get locked if you didn't bother to search for an existing thread. If you let it spiral into circular arguments over whether it's a legitimate complaint, you may as well just put an advert up inviting more afk cloakers to your space.
btw  TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Willmahh
53
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 22:42:00 -
[53] - Quote
for the record...when i say remove local, i mean make it like WH space. Don't show people unless they talk. |

Kaerakh
Surprisingly Deep Hole
230
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 22:43:00 -
[54] - Quote
Willmahh wrote:for the record...when i say remove local, i mean make it like WH space. Don't show people unless they talk.
People commonly refer to that as delayed mode I believe. Schrodinger's Hot Dropper |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1429

|
Posted - 2014.05.27 23:13:00 -
[55] - Quote
While you proposal might have some merits, it is also a proposal that has been discussed at length many times before.
Thread locked.
The rules: 16. Redundant and re-posted threads will be locked.
As a courtesy to other forum users, please search to see if there is a thread already open on the topic you wish to discuss. If so, please place your comments there instead. Multiple threads on the same subject clutter up the forums needlessly, causing good feedback and ideas to be lost. Please keep discussions regarding a topic to a single thread.
ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |