| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Nyphur
   |
Posted - 2006.06.08 15:59:00 -
[1]
First thing's first, there are a small handful of Tech 2 damage controls in game. They came from events and I have heard that they change hands for billions. They are slightly better than these damage controls in resistances but also a lot higher in fitting requirements. These damage controls are a rare COSMOS item.
Here's the stats of the radical damage control:
Low slot.
14.5% to all armour resistances
12% to all shield resistances
59% to all hull resistances
Activation duration: 30.00 sec
Energy usage: 1 energy
CPU: 15 TF (10 less than a Tech 1 damage control, 2 less than the best named damage control)
Powergrid: 1MW
And most importantly (and this is intended, not a bug), it is NOT affected by stacking penalty. If you have two 25% adaptive nanos on your ship, this will actually yield MORE resistance than adding a third. To me, that's impressive. Damage controls have become essential use on any battleship shield or armour tank. The bonuses conveyed make it more useful than a Power Diagnostic System II on a shield tank and better than another hardener on an armour tank, with the added bonus of being practically power-free and hardening your hull to give you a good few more seconds to escape should your tank fail.
Three of them for sale, auctions separate. Bidding on more than one signifies that you wish to buy more than one, please don't just bid on them all if you only want one.
1) 'Radical' Damage Control I
Starting Bid: 20mil
Minimum bid increment: 10mil
Reserve: Yes, hidden
Buyout: 200mil
Sniper rule: 30 minutes
Bid end time: 11th June 21:00 game time *
2) 'Radical' Damage Control I
Starting Bid: 20mil
Minimum bid increment: 10mil
Reserve: Yes, hidden
Buyout: 200mil
Sniper rule: 30 minutes
Bid end time: 11th June 21:00 game time *
3) 'Radical' Damage Control I
Starting Bid: 20mil
Minimum bid increment: 10mil
Reserve: Yes, hidden
Buyout: 200mil
Sniper rule: 30 minutes
Bid end time: 11th June 21:00 game time *
* I reserve the right to extend the auction due to lack of interest but will not extend it in the final day. This is because the time I've set is rather short.
Eve-Tanking.com - For tanking spreadsheet and resources. |
Palx
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 16:06:00 -
[2]
I'm interested....but not in the hidden reserve ;/....any chance you could mail me the reserve in game?
|
Rattler Morgan
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 16:06:00 -
[3]
1) 20 mil
2) 20 mil
3) 20 mil
to start you off  |
Delagris
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 16:09:00 -
[4]
I thought none of the damage controls were affected by stacking penalty? nice item nonetheless. gl
quote:
Delagris >Fit 3 damage mods and 3 pdu II
Jelmer > but I hgave noi pdus hre
Jelmer > Plenty of typo's tho
Delagris > ROFL |
Nyphur
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 16:22:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Nyphur on 08/06/2006 16:22:33
 Originally by: Palx
I'm interested....but not in the hidden reserve ;/....any chance you could mail me the reserve in game?
If I had set a reserve, I would just make that the minimum bid now, wouldn't I? ;).
The purpose of a hidden reserve is to let people know that under circumstances, I may not sell. It's insurance against the bidding not getting high enough. Just bid what you're willing to pay and if you win, chances are I'll sell :). Especially for my friends in Veritas Immortalis :).
Originally by: Delagris
I thought none of the damage controls were affected by stacking penalty? nice item nonetheless. gl
That's right, none of the damage controls are affected by stacking penalty :). This just happens to be the best damage control, however :).
Eve-Tanking.com - For tanking spreadsheet and resources. |
Raze La'Trnire
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 16:29:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Raze La''Trnire on 08/06/2006 16:29:32
3) 40 mil |
Calvoor
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 16:29:00 -
[7]
1.30
2.30
3.30
MMmmmmm Free Goo!! |
dewtauk
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 16:35:00 -
[8]
1) 150 mil
|
Lysithea
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 16:39:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Nyphur
...and better than another hardener on an armour tank, with the added bonus of being practically power-free and hardening your hull to give you a good few more seconds to escape should your tank fail.
I am not doubting you, but can you elaborate why having this module in place of another armor hardener is better?
|
Delagris
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 16:41:00 -
[10]
I think he meant better than a 3rd adaptive nano
quote:
Delagris >Fit 3 damage mods and 3 pdu II
Jelmer > but I hgave noi pdus hre
Jelmer > Plenty of typo's tho
Delagris > ROFL |
Nyphur
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 16:52:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Nyphur on 08/06/2006 16:53:56
Originally by: Lysithea
Originally by: Nyphur
...and better than another hardener on an armour tank, with the added bonus of being practically power-free and hardening your hull to give you a good few more seconds to escape should your tank fail.
I am not doubting you, but can you elaborate why having this module in place of another armor hardener is better?
Well basically, it doesn't get hit with stacking penalty. If you have, for example, two adaptive nanos fitted, the first is multiplied by 1 (full effect, 25%), the second by 0.87 to give 21.75%. Then if you go to add a third, it gets multiplied by 0.57 to give 14.25. This damage control gives 14.5% straight up, even after two adaptive nanos. It also gives shield resistance, hull resistance, uses practically no energy and has lower fitting requirements. It's just plain better :).
Eve-Tanking.com - For tanking spreadsheet and resources. |
Gazmus
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 17:08:00 -
[12]
3. 50mil
In The Face Productions |
Gypsome Fantastic
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 17:08:00 -
[13]
2) 50mill :P
|
madaluap
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 17:14:00 -
[14]
Edited by: madaluap on 08/06/2006 17:14:37
Lets get this going 80 mil * 3 (yes all of them)
_________________________________________________
|
dewtauk
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 17:27:00 -
[15]
my bid of 150 mil is retracted.
|
Nyphur
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 17:30:00 -
[16]
Originally by: madaluap
Edited by: madaluap on 08/06/2006 17:17:18
edit: bid retracted, just 0.5% difference to best named and 1% for hull
sorry 
No problem. It's worth it for missionrunning etc. and since it's the best damage control in the game. I am considering keeping one and using it on my own tank (it would increase the maximum DPS I can tank by a substantial amount) but if you're taking the ship into PvP or something, just go with the best named one.
Something like this should be treated ths same way as corpum gear or faction stuff. They're worth more because they're the best but you don't fit it to a ship you expect to lose ^^;.
Eve-Tanking.com - For tanking spreadsheet and resources. |
Nyphur
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 17:32:00 -
[17]
Current bids:
1) 30
2) 50
3) 50
Shame that 150mil was retracted, the bidding could well get that high judging by the responses it's getting :).
Eve-Tanking.com - For tanking spreadsheet and resources. |
Raze La'Trnire
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 18:01:00 -
[18]
1) 40mil
|
Gypsome Fantastic
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 18:09:00 -
[19]
Nah doubt it, may aswell close it now.
|
|
Ivan Kirilenkov
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 19:13:00 -
[20]
Thread cleaned; Please either bid or don't post. Speculating on an items value is considered off-topic unless OP has asked to be corrected if the prices doesn't reflect current market values.
|
|
Nyphur
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 21:01:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Ivan Kirilenkov
Thread cleaned; Please either bid or don't post. Speculating on an items value is considered off-topic unless OP has asked to be corrected if the prices doesn't reflect current market values.
Thanks.
But there is no market value, these items are rare and as such they are worth as much as people will pay for them, hence the auction.
Eve-Tanking.com - For tanking spreadsheet and resources. |
Lysithea
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 21:30:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Nyphur
Edited by: Nyphur on 08/06/2006 16:53:56
Originally by: Lysithea
Originally by: Nyphur
...and better than another hardener on an armour tank, with the added bonus of being practically power-free and hardening your hull to give you a good few more seconds to escape should your tank fail.
I am not doubting you, but can you elaborate why having this module in place of another armor hardener is better?
Well basically, it doesn't get hit with stacking penalty. If you have, for example, two adaptive nanos fitted, the first is multiplied by 1 (full effect, 25%), the second by 0.87 to give 21.75%. Then if you go to add a third, it gets multiplied by 0.57 to give 14.25. This damage control gives 14.5% straight up, even after two adaptive nanos. It also gives shield resistance, hull resistance, uses practically no energy and has lower fitting requirements. It's just plain better :).
I understand, thanks. The use of the term "another" was a bit confusing. It would have made more sense had you said "better than adding a THIRD hardener". I assumed "another" meant one more than whatever I was currently using. I use two 64% hardeners. Replacing one of those with your module would do me harm (yeah... blah blah about hull and shield... not important). Thanks for the explanation though.
|
madaluap
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 21:45:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Ivan Kirilenkov
Thread cleaned; Please either bid or don't post. Speculating on an items value is considered off-topic unless OP has asked to be corrected if the prices doesn't reflect current market values.
I saw you edited my post. It wasnt to ruin his auction, people pay the price they want and besides its a rare cosmos item.
Consider this a free bump and gl with your auction 
_________________________________________________
|
|
Jacques Archambault
|
Posted - 2006.06.08 22:08:00 -
[24]
Thread cleaned. Please do not discuss moderation on the forums - instead, please email [email protected] and we will be happy to discuss it further with you.
-Jacques'
forum rules | [email protected] | Our Website!
Want to be an EVE-Online forum moderator? click here!
|
|
FAsA
|
Posted - 2006.06.09 09:47:00 -
[25]
1.) 60
|
maGz
|
Posted - 2006.06.09 09:50:00 -
[26]
2/ 60m
3/ 60m
______________________
|
Hjorten
|
Posted - 2006.06.09 11:14:00 -
[27]
Not quite the best damage control module ingame, but ones nevertheless
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=340122
|
Crackfarmer
|
Posted - 2006.06.09 11:43:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Hjorten
Not quite the best damage control module ingame, but ones nevertheless
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=340122
Maybe if you read his post, you wouldn't have to look like an idiot. :)
3) 70m.
---
Don't let this be you |
Hjorten
|
Posted - 2006.06.09 12:01:00 -
[29]
oh yeah. the first sentence :)
|
Trevedian
|
Posted - 2006.06.09 13:04:00 -
[30]
1) 85 mil
2) 85 mil
3) 85 mil
Sex0r > you're bounty turns me on.. you seem like the kind of amarrian to dominate me
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |