| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
Erica Dusette
Rolled Out
10159
   |
Posted - 2014.06.16 21:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Not sure why I didn't come across this thread before!
I don't use the test server so I guess that probably explains it.
Needless to say I fully support this. Honestly, for me it's the biggest issue in EVE right now. 
Im having plenty of fun with the whole spaceships thing, but I really want to show some leg and see outfits in EVE rocket to the next meta.
Amenity Project wrote:http://i.imgur.com/ekCSCH0.png ... Erica Dusette. ;)
Amenity Project wrote:I agree that there might be SOME dresses that would be deemed inappropriate,
but definitely not ALL THE DRESSES.
Probably the black rocket one if any, at least when viewed front-on. I think the best solution for dresses would be to (like the pants and top 'tuck' option) have the hem of the dress change slightly when applied without pants.
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
16926
|
Posted - 2014.08.09 10:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP karkur wrote:And before you ask: no, we are not going to change the Rocket dress 
Wow, pretty disappointing if you ask me.
5/10.
Funny how there's no issue with every player in the game seeing their own (or others') avatars in underwear but there's a sudden moral issue (I guess?) when it comes to wearing a low-cut dress. How about actually spending some Dev time giving the rocket dresses a "tuck" option to cover the pelvis if this is your concern? Or isn't there actually anyone working in CCP now who has the skills to modify the original mesh? 
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
16957
|
Posted - 2014.08.09 14:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP karkur wrote:it's a top that's a bit long, not a low-cut dress (maybe the wording is confusing). Basically the same with the Sanctity dress, it was designed as a top to go with bottoms, but we feel that it does work on its own and you guys really want to wear it like that so we are changing it to allow you that.
Really? 
You're going to change it? Errrmmm, well that certainly wasn't the kind of reply I was expecting to get.
If so then for that I'm sorry if I was unappreciative of the changes made, but (at least for me) the Rocket dresses were exactly what inspired my excitement for the change at all. When a friend messaged me linking to your post saying "I think your dream may have come true" and I come and read every dress changed except Rocket ..... *dies inside*
I'll just move right along now, a little red-faced. Thank you CCP karkur.
10/10
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17048
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 01:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP karkur wrote:I'm sorry for the misunderstanding... I did not mean that we are changing the Rocket dress... I was referring to the Sanctity dress and didn't realize you took it as if I was talking about the Rocket dress
Uhhhgggg.
Well... is this open to debate since it's very obvious we "really want to wear it like that"?
Otherwise ISK and Aurum back please for all the Rocket dresses purchased across all my accounts and given also to others as gifts. Don't expect any more of my money either. 
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17053
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 01:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
Welp, now I'm just pissed tbh.
I directly quoted your comment about the Rocket dress, then clearly addressed it yet again in my second post. Unless you have a horrendous grasp of English then I don't understand how you could have misunderstood. Building hopes up, dropped them down again, then up again, then down again.
Let me demonstrate to you now the hypocrisy in your decision CCP karkur.
I cannot wear my Rocket Dress ingame however I can free look at my own and other people's avatars in nothing but underwear. I can freely post (ingame or forums) this, this and this and this and even this without violating any of the EULA. The list goes on. Yet for some reason you decline to modify the very dress which inspired the push for change to begin with.
I think I'd like to speak to your supervisor. 
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17055
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:07:00 -
[6] - Quote
CCP karkur wrote:I took your post as if you understood that it was a top and that by "you're going to change it" you meant the name.
Yeah sure, because that's what we've been pushing for all along.
Between this debacle and what you guys are doing in wormholes it's little wonder you've got so many detractors right now. You're about to gain another one too. ^^
Amount of time and money I pump into this game and I campaign for one single change and you guys can't even get that right.
I hope Explorer comes here and spend some time explaining this crazy decision because I don't use Twitter.
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17055
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
Salpun wrote:Have you even jumped on Sisi and seen the change?
I don't use Sisi.
I'm being told in this thread by CCP karkur that we can now wear the Sanctity Dresses without pants. However they will not allow us to wear the Rocket Dresses without pants. That is my issue.
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17057
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:25:00 -
[8] - Quote
Makoto Priano wrote:Eh. Tempest in a tea cup.
Thanks, I'll remember that next time I see you pushing for something that's important to your EVE and swing by to deride your passion for it.
Several hundred dollars per month and countless hours I put in here. If you're happy with your Sanctity dresses then go celebrate and put one on, I'll sit here and keep pushing for what is important to me.
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17057
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sugar Kyle wrote:Erica Dusette wrote:I cannot wear my Rocket Dress ingame without pants however I can freely look at my own and other people's avatars in nothing but underwear. I can freely post (ingame or forums) this, this and this and this and even this without violating any of the EULA. The list goes on. Yet for some reason you decline to modify the very dress which inspired the push for change to begin with. Poor Avatar needs a sandwich.
Yeap, I get that all the time lol
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17058
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:33:00 -
[10] - Quote
Lol the masses sense my anger and move in with tear buckets at the ready. 
I think you mean Devs, not GMs.
And yeah, I'm pissed about it. vOv
I've been polite and diplomatic about it for months as I pushed for change in this issue, with the Rocket dress as centrepiece.
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17059
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 03:02:00 -
[11] - Quote
Have to agree, not only due to the logic in your post but also because we can wear bottoms with no top, but not vice-versa? It's permissible for female avatars to quite visibly show their bra under a vest or jacket. I'm not asking for it to be the other way around, with avatars getting about in t-shirt and underpants, but to simply wear all the dresses as dresses.
The Rocket dress is spectacular. By far the best of the entire selection when worn as an actual dress.
Anyway, I'll check my sh*t and stop being so pissy. Looking forward to hearing CCP Explorer's explanation and reasoning.
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17077
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 03:54:00 -
[12] - Quote
I know and I agree. I really shouldn't have snapped at CCP karkur like I did.
karkur just exasperated my frustration with the misunderstanding earlier. Combine that with other frustrating development issues currently in other areas of the game that are important to me personally (WHs) made me react a bit angrily. And I'm sorry for that karkur.
This may seem trivial to most, but to me whining about Sov, highsec ganking and AFK cloaking seems even more so. I'm the last person to rage about stuff anywhere here, but this is the one single little thing I'd really looked forward to and spent time helping push since the dresses were first unveiled. Personally I don't even like the Sanctity dresses.
I confident already I know exactly why they haven't changed the Rocket dresses, karkur's comment in their first post made that quite obvious, as if we should already know why.
Anyway, cheers Xenuria.
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17086
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 07:40:00 -
[13] - Quote
Johnny May wrote:If I wanted CCP to change those dresses I'd be extra nice to their employees,
and not the "I want to talk to your supervisor" asshat towards someone who seems to spend his/her weekend improving an purely optical detail in this game.
Of course, I can understand how yourself or the casual observer wouldn't get irate like I did. 
Why? Well because you have no interest in this stuff, don't use it, have spent no time campaigning and pushing for it's change or the implementation of fresh content, or probably even following it's development (or lack thereof). To you this stuff is "purely optical", but sir to many many others it's a lot more.
My attitude might stink a little in this thread, and I've already apologized for being rude in my earlier posts, but the logic behind my complaint is rock-solid. If that logic is ignored because they don't like the attitude of the paying customer who presents it then that says more about them than me. I don't expect you to appreciate the importance it holds to me, just like I don't appreciate the importance that 90% of the threads in this subsection have for others because they're not things I feel passionate about in my EVE. Passionate enough to unsub 5 of my 8 accounts over this (thereby along with 5/8ths of my considerable community activity) and cut my side-spending per month here by hundreds if the outcome isn't to this consumer's satisfaction. *shrug*
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17103
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 08:51:00 -
[14] - Quote
Heya Ranger
Well what a lot of folks who are dropping by this thread to take a poke at me don't seem to realise is that this is an issue that's been ongoing for quite a while. A few people have been pushing it and campaigning for it including me and nobody more-so than Sol, the OP here. For long months I've personally been nothing but polite and diplomatic. This isn't the first day of this issue, rather the climax. As Xenuria mentioned it's importance is relative and for me it's huge.
Over a silly dress?
No, not at all. It's a little deeper than that - for an analogy look in the WH forum this past week. Unprecedented rage, unsubbing and dozens of rebellious rage/spam threads. It's all over some proposed changes. Proposed! Not even implemented! Why such a reaction over something non-tangible? Because the very proposals themselves show a huge disconnect between the Devs and the WH community. It shows a continued direction of development that the players are sick to death of.
Similarly my upset here isn't simply because I can't wear an item how I want - it's because the reasoning is unsound and on the surface appears hypocritical. Just the latest straw thrown on the back of what has been a complete snub of avatar-related development for years here, an area important to many.
We're seeing more of it now days, got your NES and some more items in the pipe, microtransactions alive and well because CCP needs that money badly. With that in mind I'm not making a "threat" to unsub some of my accounts, I'm making a promise because I don't wish to invest my time and money in encouraging a development direction I don't agree with.
And each of us as users/consumers here are well within our rights to do so. My faith in the development process is dropping and naturally my motivation to play and spend money will drop along with it. I'm sorry if me highlighting those facts somehow devalue my opinion or make me seem like I'm throwing a "hissy fit".
Foremost Im looking forward to the reasoning behind it being explained by Explorer so I can make my decisions on fact rather than assumption - which is all us avatar supporters have had to work with for years.
Cheers.
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model
WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
| |
|