Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Hevymetal
POT Corp Semper Ardens Alliance
316
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 01:06:00 -
[31] - Quote
Posted i fully support this idea. Will make it more awesome if I can eventually get this damn CQ door open. |

Glathull
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
399
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 01:33:00 -
[32] - Quote
I'm confused. I thought there would be pics of clothes without bottoms. :( Train Scout Drone Operation to V. Now. Or before June 3.
This public service announcement was brought to you by tears. Rivers and lakes of tears wept by people who were too busy griping about the changes to bother using them to their advantage. |

Jada Maroo
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
1388
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 01:35:00 -
[33] - Quote
Oh no. Bare legs. We can't have that in New Edenstan. |

Erica Dusette
Rolled Out
9368
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 01:37:00 -
[34] - Quote
Yeap, I been spruiking this issue all day/night too. 
Of course being a wormholer, by nature a pilot at the very cutting edge of style, I was offended by this gross oversight in the cut of my jib, and so it was an issue I took to heart. Several others have posted too, in the Kronos feedback thread, New Eden Store thread, and in a suggestion thread.
These new items are fantastic, along with the rest of the expansion imo, but I'd really like my avatar to use the "dress" as an actual dress. Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |

Galen Darksmith
Sky Fighters
285
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 01:58:00 -
[35] - Quote
Came expecting ass-less skirt.
Left bitterly disappointed. "EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angry when you log in, you're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, that's what hello kitty online is for." -CCP Wrangler |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2004
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 02:36:00 -
[36] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:Yeap, I been spruiking this issue all day/night too.  Of course being a wormholer, by nature a pilot at the very cutting edge of style, I was offended by this gross oversight in the cut of my jib, and so it was an issue I took to heart. Several others have posted too, in the Kronos feedback thread, New Eden Store thread, and in a suggestion thread. These new items are fantastic, along with the rest of the expansion imo, but I'd really like my avatar to use the "dress" as an actual dress. Holy **** that suits you so well, you skinny... pfffff .... lol
Sexy! :D How does one empty the signature? |

De'Veldrin
Saint's Industries Brothers of Tangra
2106
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 13:09:00 -
[37] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Yang Aurilen wrote:I'll give the body an 7/10. Face on the other hand is 3/10 would not even look at bio. Let me explain check boxes to you.... Women tend to have a wide spectrum of measurement when it comes to taking a man to bed. A guy can be kind of cute but not be bedable. He can be nice but "she does not see him that way" and wants to keep him only as a friend. There are literally dozens of possible variations. We men on the other hand...  All we have is two check boxes (two possible criteria) [ ] Would bang [ ] would not bang. Now even though the toon in the pic has an less than attractive face... that does not matter. She fits in the "would bang" check box. The only type of women that tends to be in the "would not bang" box would be like... that midget who exercises the demons in the movie poltergeist.See... would not bang. In fact... I bet that she even made it shrivel a little bit. So pretend as you may, I'd bet a luxury car that you would not kick that toon out of bed. You sir, would indeed bang!  
You forgot: [ ] Would bang, but not tell my friends. GÇ£SandboxGÇ¥ does not mean that you will succeed at anything you attempt; it means you can attempt anything you want to succeed at. One of the largest obstacles in the way of your success is other players. |

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
461
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 13:17:00 -
[38] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:You forgot: [ ] Would bang, but not tell my friends. The most common box by far, I suspect. 
Also, CCP give us that hot stuff now! |

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1967
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 13:26:00 -
[39] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:You know, I think that's why wisi isn't a more popular idea,
Not enough upper thigh. What's Wisi? WiS? WiS is a myth. To push WiS, we need to push what's there already, which is the Character Creator, the posing room and everything related. From this, we can push things further. The popularity isn't an issue. Why do you think CCP is trying to push this onto mobile devices? There's a LOT of popularity out there for all this stuff ... the issue is, as usual, the community itself.
No sorry I would have to disagree. The downfall of the WIS aspect of Incarna was that CCP focused TOO MUCH on realism, which makes it poorly over textured, poorly optimized, and will have poor scaling. If CCP wants to make WiS succeed they need to work more on useable content and not making it a model sim.
But yes to no bottoms, as I've already posted in the linked thread.
CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE-á/ Dynamic New Eden |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2011
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 13:37:00 -
[40] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:But yes to no bottoms, as I've already posted in the linked thread. Nowhere anybody talked about the past, so you are disagreeing offtopic. There is also no reason to mention it. If you would please remove that part of your post, to not create a stupid, silly, pointless and heavily opinionated ragefest from mostl clueless people ... I'd be happy.
Thanks. The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499 |
|

Kerie Thomas
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 14:06:00 -
[41] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Yang Aurilen wrote:I'll give the body an 7/10. Face on the other hand is 3/10 would not even look at bio. Let me explain check boxes to you.... Women tend to have a wide spectrum of measurement when it comes to taking a man to bed. A guy can be kind of cute but not be bedable. He can be nice but "she does not see him that way" and wants to keep him only as a friend. There are literally dozens of possible variations. We men on the other hand...  All we have is two check boxes (two possible criteria) [ ] Would bang [ ] would not bang. Now even though the toon in the pic has an less than attractive face... that does not matter. She fits in the "would bang" check box. The only type of women that tends to be in the "would not bang" box would be like... that midget who exercises the demons in the movie poltergeist.See... would not bang. In fact... I bet that she even made it shrivel a little bit. So pretend as you may, I'd bet a luxury car that you would not kick that toon out of bed. You sir, would indeed bang!  
Jesus EP, how many pics of my mother does one guy actually need? you have issues my friend. 
But in reply to the original post .............. I walk around my house in nothing but my T-shirt and if I wanted to walk around any of my ships in nothing but a T-shirt then I think I should be allowed to  |

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1970
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 14:07:00 -
[42] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:But yes to no bottoms, as I've already posted in the linked thread. Nowhere anybody talked about the past, so you are disagreeing offtopic. There is also no reason to mention it. If you would please remove that part of your post, to not create a stupid, silly, pointless and heavily opinionated ragefest from mostl clueless people ... I'd be happy. Thanks.
Done however my disagreement still stands in regards to where the focus should be placed.
CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE-á/ Dynamic New Eden |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2011
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 14:10:00 -
[43] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:But yes to no bottoms, as I've already posted in the linked thread. Nowhere anybody talked about the past, so you are disagreeing offtopic. There is also no reason to mention it. If you would please remove that part of your post, to not create a stupid, silly, pointless and heavily opinionated ragefest from mostl clueless people ... I'd be happy. Thanks. Done however my disagreement still stands in regards to where the focus should be placed. Cheers! The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499 |

Diana Kim
State Protectorate Caldari State
1117
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 15:30:00 -
[44] - Quote
Nothing is wrong with legs, but just imagine how you would walk in this dress, how would you sit in it, you would be flashing all over  I wouldn't 
I mean, if not cover knees, but maybe at least a bit more longer, you know, to feel comfortable, right? |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2014
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 15:32:00 -
[45] - Quote
Diana Kim wrote:Nothing is wrong with legs, but just imagine how you would walk in this dress, how would you sit in it, you would be flashing all over  I wouldn't  I mean, if not cover knees, but maybe at least a bit more longer, you know, to feel comfortable, right? I wouldn't mind... ;)
We should put you in new clothes too... and a new haircut... and an actual life... hmmmmm.... :)
Did somebody show you how the replica works? *snickers* xD The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499 |

Selinate
Selinate INC.
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 16:40:00 -
[46] - Quote
Given how these forums were when Incarna came out, I'm legitimately surprised that this thread wasn't trolled out of existence... in G/D no less... |

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
463
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 16:46:00 -
[47] - Quote
Kerie Thomas wrote:I walk around my house in nothing but my T-shirt and if I wanted to walk around any of my ships in nothing but a T-shirt then I think I should be allowed to  I felt a 'like' wasn't enough.
Moar space ladies in t-shirts please! |

Velicitia
Arma Artificer
2317
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 16:47:00 -
[48] - Quote
Selinate wrote:Given how these forums were when Incarna came out, I'm legitimately surprised that this thread wasn't trolled out of existence... in G/D no less...
because incarna was a ****up of massive proportions ... THIS is the stuff we were expecting with Incarna!
edit to self censor before ISD wig out. One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
3694
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 16:48:00 -
[49] - Quote
Bottomless Dress. Magic item. Unique. Cursed.
When trying to put the Bottomless Dress on, the character gets swallowed up by a one-way portal into a pocket dimension aligned to the meta elemental plane of cloth. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
4853
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 16:49:00 -
[50] - Quote
Selinate wrote:Given how these forums were when Incarna came out, I'm legitimately surprised that this thread wasn't trolled out of existence... in G/D no less...
Because good things get praise and bad things get critical responses "A naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. |
|

Selinate
Selinate INC.
0
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 16:51:00 -
[51] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:Selinate wrote:Given how these forums were when Incarna came out, I'm legitimately surprised that this thread wasn't trolled out of existence... in G/D no less... because incarna was a ****up of massive proportions ... THIS is the stuff we were expecting with Incarna! edit to self censor before ISD wig out.
I meant more about the sentiment towards anyone who wanted anything to do with the character creator or any customization at all that had to do with such was labeled as "space-barbie", and WiS was only for those who wanted to play "space-barbie". Only people who wanted to play in spaceships solely had any right to be a part of the discussion according to many.
The sentiment towards Incarna in terms of wanting to go towards making Eve a P2W model was wrong. The introduction of the new character creator, the idea of WiS and captain's quarters and the idea of more customization for eve characters was something this game desperately needed, so Incarna wasn't that big of a mess really... |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
4853
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 16:54:00 -
[52] - Quote
Selinate wrote:
I meant more about the sentiment towards anyone who wanted anything to do with the character creator or any customization at all that had to do with such was labeled as "space-barbie", and WiS was only for those who wanted to play "space-barbie". Only people who wanted to play in spaceships solely had any right to be a part of the discussion according to many.
The sentiment towards Incarna in terms of wanting to go towards making Eve a P2W model was wrong. The introduction of the new character creator, the idea of WiS and captain's quarters and the idea of more customization for eve characters was something this game desperately needed, so Incarna wasn't that big of a mess really...
Its an MMORPG and a lot of people want nice looking characters who can express their personality and character traits through the avatar.
Of course, there are plenty of people who dont care about any of that, but why would they bother coming into a thread like this if they hate anything outside of the game system? "A naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares "If someone doesn't appreciate your presence, make them appreciate your absence." - Anon. |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
3694
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 16:56:00 -
[53] - Quote
Selinate wrote:Given how these forums were when Incarna came out, I'm legitimately surprised that this thread wasn't trolled out of existence... in G/D no less... When Incarna came out a lot of things for flying in space were in dire need of attention and instead of that we got WiS and thousand dollar pants. Now they focus on fixing all of that and keep the barbie dolls as a side project. It was an outcry over neglect that only got louder over the way PR handled it. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
463
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 16:58:00 -
[54] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Selinate wrote:Given how these forums were when Incarna came out, I'm legitimately surprised that this thread wasn't trolled out of existence... in G/D no less... When Incarna came out a lot of things for flying in space were in dire need of attention and instead of that we got WiS and thousand dollar pants. Now they focus on fixing all of that and keep the barbie dolls as a side project. It was an outcry over neglect that only got louder over the way PR handled it. Yup, also unticking the 'character needs pants' box shouldn't be a big investment in dev time.  |

Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2033
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 17:40:00 -
[55] - Quote
Excuse me!
This is no thread about Incarna! Incarna is completely irrelevant to this topic, as much as WiS or anything else not about the bottomless dress, clothes, admiration of eachother and whatever else I can think of. xD
I don't want this wisshit in here, just because people are stuck in the past.
Thanks. (: The case of the bottomless dress. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=349499 |

Marsha Mallow
890
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 17:51:00 -
[56] - Quote
I thought this was just about you cavorting and role-playing the ***** inadequately
**** are too small btw TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders Repeat 0ffenders
465
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 17:55:00 -
[57] - Quote
Marsha Mallow wrote:I thought this was just about you cavorting and role-playing the ***** inadequately
**** are too small btw It's about the right to cavort without pants. |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
1713
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 18:00:00 -
[58] - Quote
Ok then, hers a small idea for you to run with sol,
Taller portraits, maby by I/4? "CAKE CANNOT HOLD UP TO BEING A CHARACTER DAMNIT."
Unsuccessful At Everything |

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
1801
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 18:05:00 -
[59] - Quote
I am raising my eyebrow. Unshaved. When weapons, technology, and economies mature faster than the leadership culture entrusted with them, disaster ensues. http://i.minus.com/ibeZ0sJewvDMBN.gif |

Orla- King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
82
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 18:08:00 -
[60] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:I am raising my eyebrow. Unshaved. So am I. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |