Yeap, I been spruiking this issue all day/night too.

Of course being a wormholer, by nature a pilot at the very cutting edge of style, I was offended by this gross oversight in the cut of my jib, and so it was an issue I took to heart. Several others have posted too, in the Kronos feedback thread, New Eden Store thread, and in a suggestion thread.

These new items are fantastic, along with the rest of the expansion imo, but I'd really like my avatar to use the "dress" as an actual dress.

Let me explain check boxes to you....



Women tend to have a wide spectrum of measurement when it comes to taking a man to bed. A guy can be kind of cute but not be bedable. He can be nice but "she does not see him that way" and wants to keep him only as a friend. There are literally dozens of possible variations.



We men on the other hand...


All we have is two check boxes (two possible criteria)

[ ] Would bang
[ ] would not bang.


Now even though the toon in the pic has an less than attractive face... that does not matter. She fits in the "would bang" check box. The only type of women that tends to be in the "would not bang" box would be like... that midget who exercises the demons in the movie poltergeist.

See... would not bang.
In fact... I bet that she even made it shrivel a little bit.


So pretend as you may, I'd bet a luxury car that you would not kick that toon out of bed. You sir, would indeed bang!

You forgot:
[ ] Would bang, but not tell my friends.

What's Wisi? WiS?
WiS is a myth.

To push WiS, we need to push what's there already,
which is the Character Creator, the posing room and everything related.

From this, we can push things further.


The popularity isn't an issue. Why do you think CCP is trying to push this onto mobile devices?
There's a LOT of popularity out there for all this stuff ... the issue is, as usual, the community itself.

But yes to no bottoms, as I've already posted in the linked thread.

Let me explain check boxes to you....



Women tend to have a wide spectrum of measurement when it comes to taking a man to bed. A guy can be kind of cute but not be bedable. He can be nice but "she does not see him that way" and wants to keep him only as a friend. There are literally dozens of possible variations.



We men on the other hand...


All we have is two check boxes (two possible criteria)

[ ] Would bang
[ ] would not bang.


Now even though the toon in the pic has an less than attractive face... that does not matter. She fits in the "would bang" check box. The only type of women that tends to be in the "would not bang" box would be like... that midget who exercises the demons in the movie poltergeist.

See... would not bang.
In fact... I bet that she even made it shrivel a little bit.


So pretend as you may, I'd bet a luxury car that you would not kick that toon out of bed. You sir, would indeed bang!

Nowhere anybody talked about the past, so you are disagreeing offtopic.
There is also no reason to mention it. If you would please remove that part of your post, to not create a stupid, silly, pointless and heavily opinionated ragefest from mostl clueless people ... I'd be happy.

Thanks.

Done however my disagreement still stands in regards to where the focus should be placed.

Nothing is wrong with legs, but just imagine how you would walk in this dress, how would you sit in it, you would be flashing all over
I wouldn't

I mean, if not cover knees, but maybe at least a bit more longer, you know, to feel comfortable, right?

I walk around my house in nothing but my T-shirt and if I wanted to walk around any of my ships in nothing but a T-shirt then I think I should be allowed to

Given how these forums were when Incarna came out, I'm legitimately surprised that this thread wasn't trolled out of existence... in G/D no less...

Given how these forums were when Incarna came out, I'm legitimately surprised that this thread wasn't trolled out of existence... in G/D no less...

because incarna was a ****up of massive proportions ... THIS is the stuff we were expecting with Incarna!


edit to self censor before ISD wig out.

I meant more about the sentiment towards anyone who wanted anything to do with the character creator or any customization at all that had to do with such was labeled as "space-barbie", and WiS was only for those who wanted to play "space-barbie". Only people who wanted to play in spaceships solely had any right to be a part of the discussion according to many.

The sentiment towards Incarna in terms of wanting to go towards making Eve a P2W model was wrong. The introduction of the new character creator, the idea of WiS and captain's quarters and the idea of more customization for eve characters was something this game desperately needed, so Incarna wasn't that big of a mess really...

Given how these forums were when Incarna came out, I'm legitimately surprised that this thread wasn't trolled out of existence... in G/D no less...

When Incarna came out a lot of things for flying in space were in dire need of attention and instead of that we got WiS and thousand dollar pants. Now they focus on fixing all of that and keep the barbie dolls as a side project. It was an outcry over neglect that only got louder over the way PR handled it.

I thought this was just about you cavorting
and role-playing the *****
inadequately

**** are too small btw

I am raising my eyebrow. Unshaved.