| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ran
   |
Posted - 2006.06.15 12:51:00 -
[1]
Last time i have lost a lot ships in highsecsystems from CONCORD. Its a hard to use repeirdrons on gangmember, who r not from ur corp. U need to lock him, and it easey to make mistake and open fier on him and be killd from CONCORD.
I will to know, why CCP not make full nonagression membership in gang? I dont know any reason not to do it, and ill not accept that stuation, that i lost many ships and can not fly in gang with ppl not from my own corp.
any ideas?
|
Peter Stuyvesant
|
Posted - 2006.06.15 12:59:00 -
[2]
Because people can gang with others and then gank them, basically.
You just need to be more careful not to activate offensive modules on your gangmates. If you had a dedicated repairing ship with no offensive modules, that would be one way of removing the risk of accidentally doing so.
|
Ran
|
Posted - 2006.06.15 13:24:00 -
[3]
I can say thesame "ppl need to be more careful and not accept gang from any1". And that politic help only in highsecspace, not to be ganked with gang inviting. But make more dificalt fly in gang with ppl not from thesame corp.
Im realy want to listening, what think CCP about it, may be it best to make full nonagression gangmembership, that wuld make live more easey.
|
GC13
|
Posted - 2006.06.15 13:32:00 -
[4]
Easier for the a-hole gankers, maybe.
You'd basically kill any of the "hey, I'm having trouble on this mission, can you help me?" teamups that occur. And yeah, they happen.
---
New to Eve? Interested in manufacturing stuff, or doing research on blueprints? Check out my fully-updated Science and Industry guide. |
Peter Stuyvesant
|
Posted - 2006.06.15 13:46:00 -
[5]
 Originally by: GC13
You'd basically kill any of the "hey, I'm having trouble on this mission, can you help me?" teamups that occur. And yeah, they happen.
Exactly. If this system were implemented, you'd just be giving the people who want risk-free high-sec ganking another method of doing it.
And why do you want this? Because you can't control your own fingers and have to activate hostile modules on your gangmates, despite the fact that you know exactly what the consequences will be.
Your post says 'i have lost a lot of ships'. Really, you just need to be more careful or adapt your tactics.
|
Vasiliyan
|
Posted - 2006.06.15 15:35:00 -
[6]
Removing CONCORD protection isn't the answer. A "friendly lock" system for repair/assist modules only would be much better.
|
Lisento Slaven
|
Posted - 2006.06.15 15:56:00 -
[7]
I'm also in favor of a different type of targetting system for support modules.
It also prevents you from getting shot on accident if they have the auto-lock feature enabled =P
---
Lisento Slaven wants to be a Space Whaler in EVE.
Put in space whales! |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |