| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1248
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 22:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
Similar to little things threads, I am collecting some ideas to take forward to the devs.
What I want from you is ideas on how you would like to see incursions changed. Everything from spawn to complexity to which sites or classes need work. Now do not go asking for a huge payout buff UNLESS you have a good justification for it.
I will be contacting some of the Incursion communities, and am willing to come on comms if you wish to give me an earful rather than spend time in the forums. Or you could send me an Evemail. Whatever floats your boat
Format
Problem: Suggestion for solution:
ie,
Problem: wasting time in competitions Solution: Indicator that shows relative position in competition over time as a scale similar to the influence one.
Thank you for your input
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1248
|
Posted - 2014.06.20 22:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
Aquila Sagitta wrote:What makes you think ccp is gonna waste their time adding content to incursions when they are working 
Maybe I would like to see them work better.
Never hurts to ask and ask again if you didn't get an answer the first time
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1253
|
Posted - 2014.06.21 07:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Thanks guys, this is great, so far.
Oh as for incurison income being out of balance>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2hsqEvPGWQ&list=PLldrBIEnJ5hMIXwk_e8-VZb0EldJqXmg_&index=21 time mark 12:00
As for the rest, duly noted and thank you for keeping it civil, so far
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1256
|
Posted - 2014.06.21 19:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
suuuuure, make me go through an extra 10 pages. (kidding)
Thanks for the link back, I do appreciate it and will mine that for ammo as well.
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1260
|
Posted - 2014.06.22 07:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
Aren't there TWO possible solutions to the 1 gated site in assault systems?
Either remove it or put more of them in so that you carry a set of ships in preparation of different needs
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1261
|
Posted - 2014.06.22 17:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
Mr Yoshine wrote:
Aon Ceisteanna r+¡omhphost chugam
Thanks, I will
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1265
|
Posted - 2014.06.23 18:29:00 -
[7] - Quote
I was chatting in back channels and this came up in the conversation. I asked for permission to let you know
Quote:Due to people not wanting to run NCN sites and the assault system eventually filling up and only having NCN sites CCP has lowered the chances of an NCN spawning as well as made it impossible for the system to only have NCNs. At MOST the system will only ever be half NCN sites.
They do listen! This may not be the 'fix' some of you were asking for but it mean no more NCN walls.
Great stuff here, so far, thank you. Still gathering my document. Still trying to get some time in fleets. But occasionally I toss some small things up the ladder to CCP to see how they react.
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1268
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 06:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
I am tired, so if this comes out rude . . .
I fly incursions so if any of you think I will take forward any proposal that removes Concord from hisec incursions then you are talking to the wrong CSM representative. Ain't gonna happen.
Some of the other ideas I do truly love but every person who wants greater inroads of PvP into the number one team and organization building PvE activity I want to answer with a proposal to make ignored incursions spread, not die. Like an infection or a patch of weeds.
This would encourage low and nullsec folks to take part in the game the way it was meant to be. After all CCP made the incursions to be run, right? So run, monkeys, run.
sigh
Yes, I know it is a bad idea. But if you push to force hisec to go more PvP then understand that I will push back.
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1272
|
Posted - 2014.06.24 17:10:00 -
[9] - Quote
SurrenderMonkey wrote:Goldiiee wrote:SurrenderMonkey wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:
I am an apron-string clutching carebear so if any of you think I will take forward any proposal that removes Concord from hisec incursions then you are talking to the wrong CSM representative. Ain't gonna happen.
Fixed your non sequitur. It doesn't logically follow that an incursion runner would necessarily have any issue with removing concord from hisec incursions. There are incursion runners in low or null who would be just fine with that. You're welcome. The lack of a consistent definition of this insult makes things very confusing. Carebear; Someone that attempts Solo-play in a sandbox and gets attitude when confronted with reality. Or is it Carebear; Anyone that doesn't conform to your limited viewpoint of what the game is about and how it is 'All about you' Actually doesn't that make you like an 'Extremist Carebear' In this case it's, carebear: One who wets himself at the notion of not having magical police standing guard over his isk farm.
Mush as I am enjoying the namecalling . . . I never made bones about being a carebear. But that is not relevant to this discussion. Improvements to Incursions is on the table for ME to choose what to take to CCP.
So I stated my position on things I will choose NOT to take.
Deal with it
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1284
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 21:27:00 -
[10] - Quote
While I still have some communities to visit I am collecting the good suggestions here and starting to form my presentation for CCP.
As a side note I DO recommend some of you go visit THIS thread as it will have some added benefits for incursion communities if that project gets some traction.
Thank you all for what you have done so far.
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1284
|
Posted - 2014.07.04 04:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
Fronkfurter McSheebleton wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:Aren't there TWO possible solutions to the 1 gated site in assault systems?
Either remove it or put more of them in so that you carry a set of ships in preparation of different needs
m This is assuming that everyone carries a set of ships with them...
What if we asked for a new ship that could carry say a BS and a cruiser or two. Incursion level carrier that works in hisec.
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1286
|
Posted - 2014.07.04 22:16:00 -
[12] - Quote
Sean Sonnach wrote:
I expect the OP will be mainly looking for positive feedback from people interested in incursions, and probably ignoring the usual, nerf them there hs incursions isks, no concord response type remarks.
already said I would.
putting the document together now, lot of reading and sorting, especially if Include the 10 pager that was linked early on.
STILL have to chat live with some folks,
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1290
|
Posted - 2014.07.08 23:50:00 -
[13] - Quote
I had a nice chat with an HQ fleet last night. Lots of ideas about incursions were generated.
They only lost two ships to the Sansha.
Only
My aren't Vindi's expensive when well fit?
I figure it was partially my fault as I was a distraction, asking questions and taking notes. Not that I can afford to even replace the cheaper of the two Vindis. I saw the kill mails and winced.
They had some interesting additions to the ideas I have collected here.
- Concord LP Store additions : Uniforms, Tags for Sec
- An Orca modification, exchange ore hold for the room to ship 2 BS's fitted plus a cruiser
- Seeing incursion rats fight normal ones (Sansha V Angels site, specific to each races space)
- Hidden sites that need to be scanned down or are contained within a jump maze
There was more and I enjoyed the conversation (except for hearing ships die due to late broadcasts)
No risk for the isk? Bullsh*t. I always can bring my gremlins
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1292
|
Posted - 2014.07.10 22:57:00 -
[14] - Quote
Nolak Ataru wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:My aren't incursion ships expensive when well fit? FTFY 
I dunno, I hear Ospreys can be quite inexpensive
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1318
|
Posted - 2014.07.25 16:36:00 -
[15] - Quote
James Baboli wrote:It seems the NCN change has not yet actually been implemented, as several systems have been NCN walled in the last few days. 
as the dev said earlier in this thread, that happens in august
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |
| |
|