Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
Crazy Alchemist
|
Posted - 2006.06.24 13:59:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Astarte Nosferatu Edited by: Astarte Nosferatu on 24/06/2006 12:34:00
Originally by: LeMonde Contestants:
T R U S T The Five
What's up with these two alliances? Didn't they disband or something?
Well the only corp left in 5 is atuk.....atuk is technicaly dice...Dice are in bob.....bob have 2 teams?
|
Tyrrax Thorrk
|
Posted - 2006.06.24 14:00:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Astarte Nosferatu
T R U S T The Five
What's up with these two alliances? Didn't they disband or something?
The Five is probably a DICE team and T R U S T D2's B team.
No surprise there, and people were encouraged to start new alliances just to compete, I'm just surprised there weren't more 5 man alliances setup for this. (Weavers of Fate mighe be one?)
I kinda expected MC to field more than one team like this.
Darpz; yeah i was wondering that too, what if 3 teams win 2 matches and one loses all three ? Three teams with 6 points each..
|
TheMantisCH
|
Posted - 2006.06.24 14:17:00 -
[63]
Most number of ships destroyed - Ships lossed maybe? Kind of like goal difference
|
|
LeMonde
|
Posted - 2006.06.24 18:21:00 -
[64]
Looks like we're missing two alliances now. This is a first-come first-serve thing, so hurry sending your mail if you want to compete.
|
|
Tamish
|
Posted - 2006.06.24 18:35:00 -
[65]
Originally by: LeMonde
The top 16 alliances from the first tournament have a reserved spot.
Please add Red Alliance to the list
|
Xamand
|
Posted - 2006.06.24 19:50:00 -
[66]
If you still have 2 slots left, I have sent an evemail on behalf of OXIDE Xamand CEO Cirrius Technologies OXIDE |
Stedanko
|
Posted - 2006.06.24 20:02:00 -
[67]
With the new rules changes and release of the schedule, requiring 5 out of 6 pilots to be available 3 days in a row at a certain time, is there any possibility to open up signups to a few more alternates? Or make changes to our previously submitted roster to allow pilots, who can show up, to participate? Maybe 5 pilots + 3-4 backups?
You've heard it before: US time zone waah waah, work sucks, f1 -f8 isn't that fun at 12pm Friday |
TheMantisCH
|
Posted - 2006.06.24 23:35:00 -
[68]
You have the option of a sub or as LeMonde has said earlier, let someone you trust play your account
|
Darpz
|
Posted - 2006.06.25 16:30:00 -
[69]
Originally by: TheMantisCH or as LeMonde has said earlier, let someone you trust play your account
but thats against CCP policy
|
Roue
|
Posted - 2006.06.25 20:33:00 -
[70]
/sarcasm on
This is an outrage. Why is this competition only for alliances. Why can't just any joe shmoe join in. Total blatant bias on CCP's part. Why just the other day I was walking down the street and decided I.. should get the superbowl trophy. Me and my friend Bob and his dog jimmy entered. We're thinking about going for the Stanley cup too.
/sarcasm off
|
|
Hllaxiu
|
Posted - 2006.06.25 23:02:00 -
[71]
Originally by: Darpz
Originally by: TheMantisCH or as LeMonde has said earlier, let someone you trust play your account
but thats against CCP policy
And last I heard they were banning accounts for it! Definately not worth the risk, no matter what LeMonde implies... --- Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail. - Emerson |
Raem Civrie
|
Posted - 2006.06.25 23:57:00 -
[72]
Originally by: Hllaxiu
Originally by: Darpz
Originally by: TheMantisCH or as LeMonde has said earlier, let someone you trust play your account
but thats against CCP policy
And last I heard they were banning accounts for it! Definately not worth the risk, no matter what LeMonde implies...
CCP is trying to trick you into violating the EULA so they can ban you.
So, did you bang someone's girlfriend to warrant this? ----
My Omber is second to none |
Freakazoid Robot
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 00:14:00 -
[73]
Originally by: Roue /sarcasm on
This is an outrage. Why is this competition only for alliances. Why can't just any joe shmoe join in. Total blatant bias on CCP's part. Why just the other day I was walking down the street and decided I.. should get the superbowl trophy. Me and my friend Bob and his dog jimmy entered. We're thinking about going for the Stanley cup too.
/sarcasm off
Were you under the impression Goonfleet could blob the opponents five man teams out or something?? I hope your directors actually understand you have to fight even numbers
|
Caldari Citizen656
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 00:18:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Freakazoid Robot
Originally by: Roue /sarcasm on
This is an outrage. Why is this competition only for alliances. Why can't just any joe shmoe join in. Total blatant bias on CCP's part. Why just the other day I was walking down the street and decided I.. should get the superbowl trophy. Me and my friend Bob and his dog jimmy entered. We're thinking about going for the Stanley cup too.
/sarcasm off
Were you under the impression Goonfleet could blob the opponents five man teams out or something?? I hope your directors actually understand you have to fight even numbers
Lol, yea, pretty big smack coming from those guys. Will be the first time in Goonfleets history that they have actually had to fight without a 10-1 advantage. Me predicts 3 and out
|
|
LeMonde
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 02:03:00 -
[75]
Just curious what people think about this idea:
Instead of giving 3 points for a win and 1 for a tie, we could give points based on enemy ships destroyed. It could work like this:
Battleship: 5 points Battlecruiser: 4 points Cruiser: 3 points Destroyer: 2 points Frigate 1 point
It would eliminate two probles we're facing:
Lets say team A and B are fighting, and team A ends up with a battleship and interceptor. Team B has only a battleship and manages to kill team A's battleship. Team A's interceptor can then simply fly around in circles until the 15 minutes are up and force a draw.
With 5 teams in a group, we could end up with a 3-way tie. This would lessen the chance of this happening.
|
|
Tyrrax Thorrk
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 02:14:00 -
[76]
That would definitely be better.
Make it so
|
Beringe
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 02:38:00 -
[77]
Originally by: LeMonde Just curious what people think about this idea: <snip>
It's a good one.
And I'm glad to see that the alliances that were sorely missing from the first draft are now either participating, or at least showing life. ------------------------------------------- "Never underestimate the power of language."
--Daitan Beringe, honorary director in charge of bottles-- |
Kcel Chim
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 10:09:00 -
[78]
Originally by: LeMonde Just curious what people think about this idea:
Instead of giving 3 points for a win and 1 for a tie, we could give points based on enemy ships destroyed. It could work like this:
Battleship: 5 points Battlecruiser: 4 points Cruiser: 3 points Destroyer: 2 points Frigate: 1 point
It would eliminate two probles we're facing:
Lets say team A and B are fighting, and team A ends up with a battleship and interceptor. Team B has only a battleship and manages to kill team A's battleship. Team A's interceptor can then simply fly around in circles until the 15 minutes are up and force a draw.
With 5 teams in a group, we could end up with a 3-way tie. This would lessen the chance of this happening.
By doing that youll only force ppl to use boring tank setups with 100s of nos and repairdrones. The side which keeps its battlecruiser and bs alive wins the battle. Also it will force ppl in return to go for the bs and bcs first to make sure they score high enough early to prevent the 15 minute timer to cripple their points. Last but not least it advertises "preventing your enemy to score" over "trying to kill all of your enemies". In many cases where teams meet with bitter "real game" histories i can forsee teams running in circles after losing a few ships. Not because they can still win this match but because surviving will also hurt the winner compared to the other teams in the group.
|
The Wizz117
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 11:16:00 -
[79]
i think its a good idea.
it is more exiting, and more fair.
------------------------------------------- That ccp created a universe doesen't mean they'r gods
|
Tyrrax Thorrk
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 12:16:00 -
[80]
Are you insane Kcel ?
How would it being a draw when an interceptor is left zooming everywhere be an improvement over what LeMonde described ??? At least then you get 5+4+3+2 points and some recognition of the fact you blew up most of your opponent's team...
|
|
j0sephine
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 13:59:00 -
[81]
Very disappointed in lack of Chribba in the end... maybe there could be at least some sort of 'winners vs Chribba' aftermatch? ;.;
|
Cathryn Wolve
|
Posted - 2006.06.26 15:27:00 -
[82]
Edited by: Cathryn Wolve on 26/06/2006 15:28:20 What about this as a possible alternative....
In the case where the two fighting teams each have one ship left at the end of 15 mins, the bigger ship left becomes the tiebreaker. This eliminates the inty buzzing around to force a tie scenario. If the two ships left are of the same class, the fight ends in a draw.
While I agree the point system is a slight improvement over the original system, I agree that it may lead to a much more defensive type setup style for the larger ship classes and promote a much more boring tournament.
|
QwaarJet
|
Posted - 2006.06.27 07:07:00 -
[83]
Where are our alliance? We submitted our team list. "Hobbes, she stepped into the Perimter Of Wisdom.Run!" |
Seleene
|
Posted - 2006.06.28 07:52:00 -
[84]
Edited by: Seleene on 28/06/2006 07:52:12
Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk The Five is probably a DICE team and T R U S T D2's B team.
No surprise there, and people were encouraged to start new alliances just to compete, I'm just surprised there weren't more 5 man alliances setup for this. (Weavers of Fate mighe be one?)
The logic was that we are one alliance, hence one team. We could have easily fielded five teams as the interest within the alliance was certianly there (we're a competative lot!). Maybe we'll do that next time and LeMonde can put all five of us in our own group and we'll slaughter each other first.
On another note, I LOVE the new tournament format. Very cool and should provide for a lot more fun than last time. -
History of the MC movie! |
heruloka
|
Posted - 2006.06.28 10:27:00 -
[85]
Originally by: Seleene Edited by: Seleene on 28/06/2006 07:52:12
Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk The Five is probably a DICE team and T R U S T D2's B team.
No surprise there, and people were encouraged to start new alliances just to compete, I'm just surprised there weren't more 5 man alliances setup for this. (Weavers of Fate mighe be one?)
The logic was that we are one alliance, hence one team. We could have easily fielded five teams as the interest within the alliance was certianly there (we're a competative lot!). Maybe we'll do that next time and LeMonde can put all five of us in our own group and we'll slaughter each other first.
On another note, I LOVE the new tournament format. Very cool and should provide for a lot more fun than last time.
dude i love that idea. fraps plz if they ever do it
|
Ting Tong
|
Posted - 2006.06.29 14:54:00 -
[86]
Edited by: Ting Tong on 29/06/2006 14:55:25 I am sure this has been mentioned elsewhere, but what if a pilot can not make the fight on time or instead of being late, knows in advance the time is not possible to meet, due to work etc.
can it be postponed ?
|
Xamand
|
Posted - 2006.06.30 02:20:00 -
[87]
Then pick a team of players that can make all of the scheduled times, is unlikely that more than one will have an emergency, hence the sub. It is limiting and does make it hard to field your preferred team, especially for a small alliance like mine, but can be done.
Btw LeMonde, I've emailed OXIDE's team list Xamand CEO Cirrius Technologies OXIDE |
UnknownHuman
|
Posted - 2006.07.01 00:02:00 -
[88]
Hello,
LeMonde I sent KAOS Empires Team list. I just want to confirm is the email [email protected] correct? LoL hopefully it is. Well Cya till the tourny!!
|
Tyrrax Thorrk
|
Posted - 2006.07.01 00:16:00 -
[89]
Probly supposed to be lemonde "at" ccpgames.com ;p
|
Creamster
|
Posted - 2006.07.01 02:47:00 -
[90]
Yeah baby, we're in ! /emote polishes his rattlesnake ___________ In LAG we trust |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |