| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3490
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 17:39:00 -
[31] - Quote
whatsin aname01 wrote:I do understand that it is usefull for some.  Is there however a way to disable sso for all sites except the eve sites from ccp?  I have a very nasty habbit not to trust any other site.  Maybe that has something to with my day job. I test software for a rather big organisation.   About 30k employees Btw I have 15 different passwords for 15 different sites. And I don't use a program to manage that. 
You'll always have to click through (for character selection), and until you do, nothing gets sent to the site. (when you do, all the site gets is your character id and name, along with a hash to uniquely identify the combination of character and account. Sell the character, and it changes. No way to identify the account, just that it's changed.) Woo! CSM 9! http://fuzzwork.enterprises/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Zalifer Esepula
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
29
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 17:47:00 -
[32] - Quote
Love single sign on, bring on mobile authenticators and I'll be even happier!
Next up is can you please either :
A) Disassociate DUST 514 and EVE Online accounts so I can be logged into both forums at once. Currently if one is logged in, the other asks you to sign out.
B) Allow me to link my DUST 514 and EVE Online accounts, so that logging into one of them counts as logging into both. For example, with both forums being logged out, I log into forums.eveonline.com and can go straight to forums.dust514.com and be already logged in.
I don't use the DUST forums much, but when I do want to, it's really really annoying to have to log out of an account for a different game. |

Kale Freeman
Dirt 'n' Glitter I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
28
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 17:48:00 -
[33] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:whatsin aname01 wrote:I do understand that it is usefull for some.  Is there however a way to disable sso for all sites except the eve sites from ccp?  I have a very nasty habbit not to trust any other site.  Maybe that has something to with my day job. I test software for a rather big organisation.   About 30k employees Btw I have 15 different passwords for 15 different sites. And I don't use a program to manage that.  You'll always have to click through (for character selection), and until you do, nothing gets sent to the site. (when you do, all the site gets is your character id and name, along with a hash to uniquely identify the combination of character and account. Sell the character, and it changes. No way to identify the account, just that it's changed.)
You're picturing a naughty site using the real CCP SSO page. The anughty site won't get any useful information until you pick the character, and even then the information isn't that useful. It would be much more effective to have a naughty site using a fake CCP SSO page.
How many people are going to check the domain and validate the certificate and all that? |

Dread Nanana
Action Super Dupper Test Corp
15
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 17:48:00 -
[34] - Quote
Lando Cenvax wrote: Consequently, if you see RC4 in your browsers connection-security window, your data is not secure. Not because someone is going to crack your connection, but because the admin has obviously no idea about properly securing a webserver.
Well, there is only speculation that it is insecure. Though Microsoft indicated to disable RC4 stream ciphers completely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RC4
But yes, it's not so good for this to be preferred over higher ciphers. If I disable RC4 stuff in Firefox, it connects with something a little better,
TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA
Still no perfect forward secrecy, but better. I don't know why servers seem to prefer crappier crypto over better crypto out of the box.
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
3204
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 17:51:00 -
[35] - Quote
For Luddites like myself, will we still be able to log onto the Eve site as we do today, or are we being forced to use this SSO nonsense? Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3490
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 17:53:00 -
[36] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:For Luddites like myself, will we still be able to log onto the Eve site as we do today, or are we being forced to use this SSO nonsense?
Pssst. You've been using the SSO for a fairly long time now. Woo! CSM 9! http://fuzzwork.enterprises/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Rain6637
Team Evil
15275
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 17:57:00 -
[37] - Quote
no way. no way he's for real President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub | Rainfleet on Twitch | Twitter | Rainfleet mk.III | Imgur |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3490
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 18:00:00 -
[38] - Quote
Kale Freeman wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:whatsin aname01 wrote:I do understand that it is usefull for some.  Is there however a way to disable sso for all sites except the eve sites from ccp?  I have a very nasty habbit not to trust any other site.  Maybe that has something to with my day job. I test software for a rather big organisation.   About 30k employees Btw I have 15 different passwords for 15 different sites. And I don't use a program to manage that.  You'll always have to click through (for character selection), and until you do, nothing gets sent to the site. (when you do, all the site gets is your character id and name, along with a hash to uniquely identify the combination of character and account. Sell the character, and it changes. No way to identify the account, just that it's changed.) You're picturing a naughty site using the real CCP SSO page. The anughty site won't get any useful information until you pick the character, and even then the information isn't that useful. It would be much more effective to have a naughty site using a fake CCP SSO page. How many people are going to check the domain and validate the certificate and all that?
That's a problem with any SSO solution (twitter, facebook, et al). However, if you've already signed into the SSO, and used the remember me option, it won't prompt for details, just to pick the character.
And the login page hasn't had autocomplete disabled, so it can have your browser remember your credentials. So you don't need to type them.
Yes, you'll get idiots who won't check the domain. The same idiots who get emails 'from amazon' (not an amazon address) to them (and a bunch of other people in the to line) for an invoice (in a zip file), and think it's legit. Woo! CSM 9! http://fuzzwork.enterprises/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
3204
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 18:14:00 -
[39] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:For Luddites like myself, will we still be able to log onto the Eve site as we do today, or are we being forced to use this SSO nonsense? Pssst. You've been using the SSO for a fairly long time now.
As long as I can log on the same way as I do today, without any more hoop-jumping, and without providing more personal information (love how many sites now require your facebook account to log on), I am fine. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Aalysia Valkeiper
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
47
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 18:29:00 -
[40] - Quote
how can anyone say facebook is involved with enhanced security... unless it's because they're a breech?
I don't care who else authenticates the information. If facebook's involved, it's a leaky sieve. There is NO security. |
|

CCP Explorer
C C P C C P Alliance
2249

|
Posted - 2014.07.03 18:47:00 -
[41] - Quote
IceGuerilla wrote:We have this total rubbish, but we still can't change characters without relogging? What a load of poppycock. You need to explain to me how these two things are linked. One is the login mechanism used by our web sites and services and the launcher, the other is a large repository of legacy code that assumes the character ID won't change while the session is active. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson | Senior Development Director | EVE Online // CCP Games | @erlendur |
|
|

CCP Explorer
C C P C C P Alliance
2249

|
Posted - 2014.07.03 18:54:00 -
[42] - Quote
Kenneth Feld wrote:What about Amazon??
I **THOUGHT** I was using SSO to sign on there for like a year now??? Can you detail this question a bit more, please. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson | Senior Development Director | EVE Online // CCP Games | @erlendur |
|

Lothros Andastar
The Minutemen The Bastion
134
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 19:08:00 -
[43] - Quote
CCP Explorer wrote:IceGuerilla wrote:We have this total rubbish, but we still can't change characters without relogging? What a load of poppycock. You need to explain to me how these two things are linked. One is the login mechanism used by our web sites and services and the launcher, the other is a large repository of legacy code that assumes the character ID won't change while the session is active. He is referring to the fact that Eve players have been pissed off for quite a while now, because CCP seems to have time and resources for this project that literally zero people wanted or asked for and will cause phishing to go though the damn roof because no matter how secure you make it people are still stupid, but on the other hand finding time to, literally widdle away close to 2 million dollars on failed game projects, but at the same time lack time and resources to providing BASIC functionality and UI customisability that other games have had for decades.
I know that (probably) has nothing to do with you personally, but it still annoys people.
We already have API keys for logging into external sites, we don't need the risk of exposing passwords either through user error, webmaster error or plain simply tech error. We know that SSL is probably compromised if not already but soon. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3491
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 19:21:00 -
[44] - Quote
Aalysia Valkeiper wrote:how can anyone say facebook is involved with enhanced security... unless it's because they're a breech?
I don't care who else authenticates the information. If facebook's involved, it's a leaky sieve. There is NO security.
Facebook aren't involved. They were mentioned as an example of an SSO service. Nothing else.
Woo! CSM 9! http://fuzzwork.enterprises/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Tam Althor
lll tempered sea bass Brothers of Tangra
37
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 19:25:00 -
[45] - Quote
Lothros Andastar wrote:CCP Explorer wrote:IceGuerilla wrote:We have this total rubbish, but we still can't change characters without relogging? What a load of poppycock. You need to explain to me how these two things are linked. One is the login mechanism used by our web sites and services and the launcher, the other is a large repository of legacy code that assumes the character ID won't change while the session is active. He is referring to the fact that Eve players have been pissed off for quite a while now, because CCP seems to have time and resources for this project that literally zero people wanted or asked for and will cause phishing to go though the damn roof because no matter how secure you make it people are still stupid, but on the other hand finding time to, literally widdle away close to 2 million dollars on failed game projects, but at the same time lack time and resources to providing BASIC functionality and UI customisability that other games have had for decades. I know that (probably) has nothing to do with you personally, but it still annoys people. We already have API keys for logging into external sites, we don't need the risk of exposing passwords either through user error, webmaster error or plain simply tech error. We know that SSL is probably compromised if not already but soon.
Add to this, two factor authentication that was promised and then forgotten about. CCP is getting back on the path of delivering crap that they want and that players don't care about. |

Terminator 2
Omega Boost
4
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 19:29:00 -
[46] - Quote
How about anonymity and privacy?
What happens when i have signed into EVE and then browse one of those sites?
Will i first have to go there so that they can catch my name and IP and then have to log out there to change to anonymity or another non-SSO account? Which of course is useless since they already have my IP from SSO...
Also, what happens to my EVE session when i chose to logout from SSO to browse one of those sites while trying to preserve my dignity?
I would expect at least a clear privacy statement regarding everything involved with SSO before being forced using any of it. Also am i forced to use it?
It is because of all those "goodness" happening to us lately that i knowingly refuse and avoid having a facebook account or anything similar that connects different data sources voiding your privacy. |

Aalysia Valkeiper
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
47
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 19:31:00 -
[47] - Quote
whatsin aname01 wrote:I do understand that it is usefull for some.  Is there however a way to disable sso for all sites except the eve sites from ccp?  I have a very nasty habbit not to trust any other site.  Maybe that has something to with my day job. I test software for a rather big organisation.   About 30k employees Btw I have 15 different passwords for 15 different sites. And I don't use a program to manage that. 
I'm studying Network Security and Digital Forensics under scholarship. With one program, I'm learning how to keep computers safe from intrusion. With the other program, I'm learning how to break into them.
Like you, I've gotten a severe case of paranioa when it pertains to 'third party' applications... especially the "single-signon-services". The so-called 'social sites' rate on the 'trustworthy' scale just above politicians and facebook rates as the lowest of all those.
I want nothing to do with any services outside EvE online.
I want to know if we will have the option to NOT use this SSO. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3491
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 19:34:00 -
[48] - Quote
Terminator 2 wrote:How about anonymity and privacy?
What happens when i have signed into EVE and then browse one of those sites?
Will i first have to go there so that they can catch my name and IP and then have to log out there to change to anonymity or another non-SSO account? Which of course is useless since they already have my IP from SSO...
Also, what happens to my EVE session when i chose to logout from SSO to browse one of those sites while trying to preserve my dignity?
I would expect at least a clear privacy statement regarding everything involved with SSO before being forced using any of it. Also am i forced to use it?
It is because of all those "goodness" happening to us lately that i knowingly refuse and avoid having a facebook account or anything similar that connects different data sources voiding your privacy.
You have to explicitly authenticate against those sites, picking the character that you want them to see.
Nothing automatic. Woo! CSM 9! http://fuzzwork.enterprises/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Aalysia Valkeiper
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
48
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 19:42:00 -
[49] - Quote
Dread Nanana wrote:Lando Cenvax wrote: Consequently, if you see RC4 in your browsers connection-security window, your data is not secure. Not because someone is going to crack your connection, but because the admin has obviously no idea about properly securing a webserver.
Well, there is only speculation that it is insecure. Though Microsoft indicated to disable RC4 stream ciphers completely. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RC4But yes, it's not so good for this to be preferred over higher ciphers. If I disable RC4 stuff in Firefox, it connects with something a little better, TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA Still no perfect forward secrecy, but better. I don't know why servers seem to prefer crappier crypto over better crypto out of the box.
Maintaining and updating the older encryption takes less time (costs less) than develping a new encryption. New encryption by default must be radically different from the encryptions they replace, otherwise, their 'shelf-life' is severely curtailed.
Digital Security is a very dynamic field. Malware developers are being paid big money for their product and security firms are as well. There is only one way to 'complete and perfect security'... don't get online and don't provide services to anyone. |

Kale Freeman
Dirt 'n' Glitter I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
28
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 19:51:00 -
[50] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Terminator 2 wrote:How about anonymity and privacy?
What happens when i have signed into EVE and then browse one of those sites?
Will i first have to go there so that they can catch my name and IP and then have to log out there to change to anonymity or another non-SSO account? Which of course is useless since they already have my IP from SSO...
Also, what happens to my EVE session when i chose to logout from SSO to browse one of those sites while trying to preserve my dignity?
I would expect at least a clear privacy statement regarding everything involved with SSO before being forced using any of it. Also am i forced to use it?
It is because of all those "goodness" happening to us lately that i knowingly refuse and avoid having a facebook account or anything similar that connects different data sources voiding your privacy. You have to explicitly authenticate against those sites, picking the character that you want them to see. Nothing automatic. (And it has been stated, you're already using it. It's how you sign into any CCP site. Third party sites have an additional step, not seeing the account level, just a character you select as part of the auth process)
How is it going to work for someone who wants to be one character when logging into this alliances infrastructure and another character when logging into another alliances infrastrcuture? I guess he will just have login with username and password each time he goes to either forum. No more cookies for him. |

Aalysia Valkeiper
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
49
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 19:52:00 -
[51] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Aalysia Valkeiper wrote:how can anyone say facebook is involved with enhanced security... unless it's because they're a breech?
I don't care who else authenticates the information. If facebook's involved, it's a leaky sieve. There is NO security. Facebook aren't involved. They were mentioned as an example of an SSO service. Nothing else.
That is good. I guess my opinion was a bit too blatant. sorry.
I've gotten a little too close a look at many companies' security systems in the last 3 years and it's made me a bit paraniod.
Facebook has been a shining example of how NOT to run security throughout my study's.
CCP, on the other hand gets a MUCH better grade. You guys seem to know what you're doing in security. I know it isn't easy in the type of industry you're in.
|

Aalysia Valkeiper
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
49
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 19:55:00 -
[52] - Quote
Terminator 2 wrote:How about anonymity and privacy?
What happens when i have signed into EVE and then browse one of those sites?
Will i first have to go there so that they can catch my name and IP and then have to log out there to change to anonymity or another non-SSO account? Which of course is useless since they already have my IP from SSO...
Also, what happens to my EVE session when i chose to logout from SSO to browse one of those sites while trying to preserve my dignity?
I would expect at least a clear privacy statement regarding everything involved with SSO before being forced using any of it. Also am i forced to use it?
It is because of all those "goodness" happening to us lately that i knowingly refuse and avoid having a facebook account or anything similar that connects different data sources voiding your privacy.
I can answer that, judging from what I have seen regarding CCP's policies 'behind the scene'.
The third parties won't get your IP address if you go to them after logging in with EvE online. Instead, they will get CCP's IP as your proxy.
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3491
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 19:56:00 -
[53] - Quote
Kale Freeman wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Terminator 2 wrote:How about anonymity and privacy?
What happens when i have signed into EVE and then browse one of those sites?
Will i first have to go there so that they can catch my name and IP and then have to log out there to change to anonymity or another non-SSO account? Which of course is useless since they already have my IP from SSO...
Also, what happens to my EVE session when i chose to logout from SSO to browse one of those sites while trying to preserve my dignity?
I would expect at least a clear privacy statement regarding everything involved with SSO before being forced using any of it. Also am i forced to use it?
It is because of all those "goodness" happening to us lately that i knowingly refuse and avoid having a facebook account or anything similar that connects different data sources voiding your privacy. You have to explicitly authenticate against those sites, picking the character that you want them to see. Nothing automatic. (And it has been stated, you're already using it. It's how you sign into any CCP site. Third party sites have an additional step, not seeing the account level, just a character you select as part of the auth process) How is it going to work for someone who wants to be one character when logging into this alliances infrastructure and another character when logging into another alliances infrastrcuture? I guess he will just have login with username and password each time he goes to either forum. No more cookies for him.
If you want to auth with a different account, then you'll need to change your log on for login.eveonline.com. If it's just another character on the same account, you won't. (There's a very basic version up and running on my site, if you want to see it in action. I'd suggest logging onto the https://sisilogin.testeveonline.com/ site first, if you've never done it before. ) Woo! CSM 9! http://fuzzwork.enterprises/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3491
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 20:03:00 -
[54] - Quote
Aalysia Valkeiper wrote:Terminator 2 wrote:How about anonymity and privacy?
What happens when i have signed into EVE and then browse one of those sites?
Will i first have to go there so that they can catch my name and IP and then have to log out there to change to anonymity or another non-SSO account? Which of course is useless since they already have my IP from SSO...
Also, what happens to my EVE session when i chose to logout from SSO to browse one of those sites while trying to preserve my dignity?
I would expect at least a clear privacy statement regarding everything involved with SSO before being forced using any of it. Also am i forced to use it?
It is because of all those "goodness" happening to us lately that i knowingly refuse and avoid having a facebook account or anything similar that connects different data sources voiding your privacy. I can answer that, judging from what I have seen regarding CCP's policies 'behind the scene'. The third parties won't get your IP address if you go to them after logging in with EvE online. Instead, they will get CCP's IP as your proxy.
Nope. No proxy.
They'll get your IP address. Just like they would if you went to their site anyway.
The process is:
- Go to the 3rd party site.
- Click the login link.
- This sends you to the login.eveonline.com site (for the live version. sisilogin.testeveonline.com for the dev), with an identifier saying which site you're coming from.
- You log onto that site.
- You pick a character.
- You get sent back to the original site, onto a particular url that the site owner specified. A code is passed as part of the redirect.
- That code is checked by the original site (talking to login.eveonline.com) with a secret that's not shared. If everything matches, the character id etc is sent back.
Woo! CSM 9! http://fuzzwork.enterprises/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Aalysia Valkeiper
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
50
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 20:16:00 -
[55] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Aalysia Valkeiper wrote:Terminator 2 wrote:How about anonymity and privacy?
What happens when i have signed into EVE and then browse one of those sites?
Will i first have to go there so that they can catch my name and IP and then have to log out there to change to anonymity or another non-SSO account? Which of course is useless since they already have my IP from SSO...
Also, what happens to my EVE session when i chose to logout from SSO to browse one of those sites while trying to preserve my dignity?
I would expect at least a clear privacy statement regarding everything involved with SSO before being forced using any of it. Also am i forced to use it?
It is because of all those "goodness" happening to us lately that i knowingly refuse and avoid having a facebook account or anything similar that connects different data sources voiding your privacy. I can answer that, judging from what I have seen regarding CCP's policies 'behind the scene'. The third parties won't get your IP address if you go to them after logging in with EvE online. Instead, they will get CCP's IP as your proxy. Nope. No proxy. They'll get your IP address. Just like they would if you went to their site anyway. The process is:
- Go to the 3rd party site.
- Click the login link.
- This sends you to the login.eveonline.com site (for the live version. sisilogin.testeveonline.com for the dev), with an identifier saying which site you're coming from.
- You log onto that site.
- You pick a character.
- You get sent back to the original site, onto a particular url that the site owner specified. A code is passed as part of the redirect.
- That code is checked by the original site (talking to login.eveonline.com) with a secret that's not shared. If everything matches, the character id etc is sent back.
hmmm... I misunderstood what I was looking at. That was a very basic mistake, too. I guess I still have quite a bit more to look thru. |

Rain6637
Team Evil
15275
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 20:37:00 -
[56] - Quote
that's pretty slick. so these sites -won't- see my account name and login?
I've read through the dev blog twice now, and that part is still unclear.
//ok. i see it now. took 3 tries: middle of the second paragraph.
I think the title of the dev blog should be more like: SSO: log in to third party sites without revealing account info
main idea up-front/cut to the chase... because attention span. as hard as I tried, my pupils dilated as I began reading that article (in that way when it's just like 'ok i dunno wtf'). President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub | Rainfleet on Twitch | Twitter | Rainfleet mk.III | Imgur |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
2815
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 21:04:00 -
[57] - Quote
CCP Explorer wrote:IceGuerilla wrote:We have this total rubbish, but we still can't change characters without relogging? What a load of poppycock. You need to explain to me how these two things are linked. One is the login mechanism used by our web sites and services and the launcher, the other is a large repository of legacy code that assumes the character ID won't change while the session is active. One is a way to log into a service. The other is a way to log into a service.
You can see why, to us users, it seems to be the same thing.
Waving the "legacy code" flag just makes it look like you are looking for excuses to not do your job. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Tzar Sinak
Mythic Heights
108
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 21:04:00 -
[58] - Quote
Thank you for the dev blog. I am not certain if I read it or not but I do not think i saw a "why". Why is CCP doing this? Thanks. |

Lando Cenvax
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 21:05:00 -
[59] - Quote
Aalysia Valkeiper wrote:Maintaining and updating the older encryption takes less time (costs less) than develping a new encryption. New encryption by default must be radically different from the encryptions they replace, otherwise, their 'shelf-life' is severely curtailed. Digital Security is a very dynamic field. Malware developers are being paid big money for their product and security firms are as well. There is only one way to 'complete and perfect security'... don't get online and don't provide services to anyone. The encryption-libraries are available for free and/or are built into webservers. All you need to do is to have a current version and specify which ciphers you allow and which not. You don't need to be a crypto-specialist at all, just need to know that RC4, MD5, DSA are not that good and that elliptic curves (ECDHE-Ciphers) provide forward secrecy. A simple approach to secure HTTPS is using a few ECDHE-Ciphers on top of the list and weak ciphers for older clients on the bottom.
Anyway, to not cause any concerns, https://secure.eveonline.com is actually secure, so your credit card data is safe.
B2T: SSO is Token/Ticket-based as far as I understood. From security point of view this is secure by design. Basic principle to my understanding: you want to Login at a external website, click on "Login" there and are redirected to login.eveonline.com on separate window/tab/pop-up. Together with this login-Redirection the external site passes a ticket (like session-id) it to login.eveonline.com. When you logged in at login.eveonline.com this ticket is validated and sent back to the external page giving the external page your Char-Name. Login at external Page with your character completed. => Entire Login-Process takes places at login.eveonline.com. |

Uncertain Fate
EVE University Ivy League
0
|
Posted - 2014.07.03 21:07:00 -
[60] - Quote
Forgive my ignorance, but how is this different (better?) than simply entering your API keys? The significance seems to be lost on me. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |