Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
5093
|
Posted - 2014.07.06 21:37:00 -
[31] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:The Problem: Fancy pirate built battleships and other shiny ships being used for pirate gut-curdling nonsense like Level 4 missions. Furthermore the blatant usage of Machariels in Miner and Freighter bumping.
The Proposal: Given that CONCORD have presence around gates in high-sec, they should be taking pre-emptive action against what is blatantly a set-up for a Freighter gank. Furthermore the mortal sin of using these nice ships to carebear in fluffy pillow land is sickening and should be banned, or pirate NPS's should be encouraged to circumvent these efforts in a similar way that CONCORD deals with pirate activity.
This would further lead to situations where you have someone attacking the Serpentis in a Bhaalghorn, the Blood Raiders come in to comandeer their vessel and in-turn CONCORD or the Navy come in and a giant 3 or 4 way battle ensues.
The Third Bold Heading: The less reasons people have to hoard nice things in high-sec the better. Give more content to low, null and J. High-Sec should remain a training ground only.
Death to all Caldari and Minmatar, Glory to the Empress Jamyl Sarum and Ruler of the Ammatar Mandate Yonis Ardishapur.
Hey Spank, long time no see.
I actually agree with your points. Implementation would be a huge issue. You know how it is: once you let something go, changing it towards more logical conclusions generates oceans of tears and nerd rage.
The way I would have done it was to set up multiple tiers of faction ships and let the higher tiers be restricted, kind of like teasing the players to leave highsec if they want to enjoy more firepower. Bring back DEEEEP Space! |
Zero Sum Gain
FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOM Silent Requiem
49
|
Posted - 2014.07.06 22:23:00 -
[32] - Quote
How about we just make security status inversely proportional to skill points and get high sec over with already? |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
1654
|
Posted - 2014.07.06 22:49:00 -
[33] - Quote
Zero Sum Gain wrote:How about we just make security status inversely proportional to skill points and get high sec over with already? How many skill points to -10.0? What's the equation? If it's completely additive, then even a 2 year old pilot is going to be over +9.0. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) "What if [climate change is] a big hoax and we create a better world for nothing?" -comic on Greenmonk |
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Hello-There
598
|
Posted - 2014.07.06 22:50:00 -
[34] - Quote
Zero Sum Gain wrote:How about we just make security status inversely proportional to skill points and get high sec over with already?
Because being highly skilled doesn't automatically mean you should move to a hive of scum and villainy like Mos Eisley but without the politeness? |
Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
1489
|
Posted - 2014.07.06 22:52:00 -
[35] - Quote
I've waited years for my phantasm to finally be useful again, so no... Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |
DrysonBennington
Aliastra Gallente Federation
148
|
Posted - 2014.07.06 23:28:00 -
[36] - Quote
First off I would like to say job with the character. It looks like you took a lot of time and effort to develop it. +10. Unlike that Cannibal Kane and his gloriously flowing aromatic cacophony called CODE. that flows around the Universe bringing order to chaos.
Try the newest conditioner Kane its called CODE. Begone. We're gonna wash that CODE'. right out of hair...gonna wash that CODE. right out of your hair. only 19.95 ISK from Bennington Enterprises. Will be on the shelf in a few weeks.
Make certain to get the kiddie version as well that is formulated to not burn their eyes unlike the filth that CODE. vomits on a daily basis.
Now onto the matter at hand - The Problem: Fancy pirate built battleships and other shiny ships being used for pirate gut-curdling nonsense like Level 4 missions. Furthermore the blatant usage of Machariels in Miner and Freighter bumping.
I run level fours in a Kronos because I can.
If you want to put an end to the miner bumping then start a cause to gank the Machariels which now they will be using reppers to make certain that the Bump Ship isn't ganked. Which is good because the rep ships are easy to gank and will cost CODE. more and more ISK to fund and support when ganked.
The Proposal: Given that CONCORD have presence around gates in high-sec, they should be taking pre-emptive action against what is blatantly a set-up for a Freighter gank. Furthermore the mortal sin of using these nice ships to carebear in fluffy pillow land is sickening and should be banned, or pirate NPS's should be encouraged to circumvent these efforts in a similar way that CONCORD deals with pirate activity.
Why not just have CONCORD establish a field around each high sector gate that would function like a Warp Bubble that when a ship reaches a certain velocity based on its mass that it would tractored by the gate to keep it from bumping. The field would extend around each gate out to 10km and then return to normal space where bumping could take place.
Faction Warfare and Corporations under War Dec's would be immune to this limitation however.
...gonna wash that CODE. right out of your hair |
Fer'isam K'ahn
None Of One
187
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 00:11:00 -
[37] - Quote
DrysonBennington wrote:First off I would like to say job with the character. It looks like you took a lot of time and effort to develop it. +10. Unlike that Cannibal Kane and his gloriously flowing aromatic cacophony called CODE. that flows around the Universe bringing order to chaos.
Try the newest conditioner Kane its called CODE. Begone. We're gonna wash that CODE'. right out of hair...gonna wash that CODE. right out of your hair. only 19.95 ISK from Bennington Enterprises. Will be on the shelf in a few weeks.
Make certain to get the kiddie version as well that is formulated to not burn their eyes unlike the filth that CODE. vomits on a daily basis.
Now onto the matter at hand - The Problem: Fancy pirate built battleships and other shiny ships being used for pirate gut-curdling nonsense like Level 4 missions. Furthermore the blatant usage of Machariels in Miner and Freighter bumping.
I run level fours in a Kronos because I can.
If you want to put an end to the miner bumping then start a cause to gank the Machariels which now they will be using reppers to make certain that the Bump Ship isn't ganked. Which is good because the rep ships are easy to gank and will cost CODE. more and more ISK to fund and support when ganked.
The Proposal: Given that CONCORD have presence around gates in high-sec, they should be taking pre-emptive action against what is blatantly a set-up for a Freighter gank. Furthermore the mortal sin of using these nice ships to carebear in fluffy pillow land is sickening and should be banned, or pirate NPS's should be encouraged to circumvent these efforts in a similar way that CONCORD deals with pirate activity.
Why not just have CONCORD establish a field around each high sector gate that would function like a Warp Bubble that when a ship reaches a certain velocity based on its mass that it would tractored by the gate to keep it from bumping. The field would extend around each gate out to 10km and then return to normal space where bumping could take place.
Faction Warfare and Corporations under War Dec's would be immune to this limitation however.
...gonna wash that CODE. right out of your hair Whut?
Forgot [/sarcasm] [/logic] or [/brain leakage] font ? Are you sure your issues aren't elsewhere ?! |
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
2310
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 02:46:00 -
[38] - Quote
Fer'isam K'ahn wrote: Whut? Forgot [/sarcasm] [/logic] or [/brain leakage] font ?
[/threadjacking] is more accurate but the truth is that it's Dryson. He has his own font. It's called [/alternatereality].
|
Dun'Gal
Myriad Contractors Inc.
141
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 03:34:00 -
[39] - Quote
After further consideration I would not only like to +1 this thread, I feel that it should be expanded upon. All pilots flying pirate faction ships (with the exception of SoE) anywhere in empire should immediately be flagged suspect upon undocking/entering a system. It is suspicious a.f. that people are flying the colours of these factions openly. I'm also all for navy chasing you as though you are outlaw, in high-sec, for flying one of these. |
Xercodo
Xovoni Astronautical Manufacturing and Engineering
3590
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 08:01:00 -
[40] - Quote
WB Lady Spank The Drake is a Lie |
|
Gypsio III
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
1245
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 08:16:00 -
[41] - Quote
Make all the bonuses of pirate faction ships dependent on the sec status of the pilot. Full bonus at -10 sec, no bonus at -5 sec.
|
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
3544
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 08:21:00 -
[42] - Quote
Great idea! They have already proven they can add system specific anomalies in wormholes. There is no reason why they cannot extend this to known space.
Limiting all damage output in high-sec to safe levels will also solve peoples issues with suicide ganking. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
1165
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 08:26:00 -
[43] - Quote
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:Except in this case the paymasters of the cops often use you as deputies to maintain law and order so would probably turn a blind eye to any 'non-standard' issue kit... I sincerely believe that this thread is now about highsec speeding tickets and regulations for ship modifications. Stupidity should be a bannable offense.
Also This --> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=216699 Please stop making "afk cloak" threads, thanks in advance. |
Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
1165
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 08:28:00 -
[44] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Great idea! They have already proven they can add system specific anomalies in wormholes. There is no reason why they cannot extend this to known space.
Limiting all damage output in high-sec to safe levels will also solve peoples issues with suicide ganking. I suspect you are guilty of the use of humor in that post of yours, but i still gotto ask: You do know that Gypsio III made a joke, right? Stupidity should be a bannable offense.
Also This --> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=216699 Please stop making "afk cloak" threads, thanks in advance. |
Tchulen
Trumpets and Bookmarks The Volition Cult
813
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 10:01:00 -
[45] - Quote
Debora Tsung wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Great idea! They have already proven they can add system specific anomalies in wormholes. There is no reason why they cannot extend this to known space.
Limiting all damage output in high-sec to safe levels will also solve peoples issues with suicide ganking. I suspect you are guilty of the use of humor in that post of yours, but i still gotto ask: You do know that Gypsio III made a joke, right?
Highly amusing thread Not seen so much sarcasm in a long time. It's a nice change to read such an amusingly troll OP post. +1 |
Gypsio III
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
1245
|
Posted - 2014.07.07 11:18:00 -
[46] - Quote
Debora Tsung wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Great idea! They have already proven they can add system specific anomalies in wormholes. There is no reason why they cannot extend this to known space.
Limiting all damage output in high-sec to safe levels will also solve peoples issues with suicide ganking. I suspect you are guilty of the use of humor in that post of yours, but i still gotto ask: You do know that Gypsio III made a joke, right?
Who said I was joking?
Yeah, it was a joke... mostly. I think it's also an interesting idea that would provide a useful up side to be an outlaw. I wouldn't apply it to the existing pirate ships because of ~RAGE~, but it'd be fun to see sec status-related bonuses on a future ship class. |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
3551
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 05:17:00 -
[47] - Quote
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:so no pirate ships in hisec...just means people will use cheap t1 setups to run missions and combat anoms in high instead and take away all those shiny targets from the ganks squads...Besides ...why would CONCORD care? These pirate ships are being used for pest control in their eyes, and clearly far more effectively than they can do.
High Sec Ganking solved in one swoop! Surely a bonus, and all thanks to me and the glory of the Empress! (a¦á_a¦â) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
3551
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 05:20:00 -
[48] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Lady Spank wrote:The Problem: Fancy pirate built battleships and other shiny ships being used for pirate gut-curdling nonsense like Level 4 missions. Furthermore the blatant usage of Machariels in Miner and Freighter bumping.
The Proposal: Given that CONCORD have presence around gates in high-sec, they should be taking pre-emptive action against what is blatantly a set-up for a Freighter gank. Furthermore the mortal sin of using these nice ships to carebear in fluffy pillow land is sickening and should be banned, or pirate NPS's should be encouraged to circumvent these efforts in a similar way that CONCORD deals with pirate activity.
This would further lead to situations where you have someone attacking the Serpentis in a Bhaalghorn, the Blood Raiders come in to comandeer their vessel and in-turn CONCORD or the Navy come in and a giant 3 or 4 way battle ensues.
The Third Bold Heading: The less reasons people have to hoard nice things in high-sec the better. Give more content to low, null and J. High-Sec should remain a training ground only.
Death to all Caldari and Minmatar, Glory to the Empress Jamyl Sarum and Ruler of the Ammatar Mandate Yonis Ardishapur. Hey Spank, long time no see. I actually agree with your points. Implementation would be a huge issue. You know how it is: once you let something go, changing it towards more logical conclusions generates oceans of tears and nerd rage. The way I would have done it was to set up multiple tiers of faction ships and let the higher tiers be restricted, kind of like teasing the players to leave highsec if they want to enjoy more firepower.
Exactly my idea, with a little refinement. Maybe there can be petty larcenies for piloting lesser pirate ships, and heavier CONCORDOKKENED repercussions for flying the more dangerous powerful ships in lawful space.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
3551
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 05:21:00 -
[49] - Quote
Xercodo wrote:WB Lady Spank Thanks Xercodo, I hope you are happy and well (a¦á_a¦â) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
NEONOVUS
Diabolically Sexy Eureka-Secret Science R Us
903
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 14:41:00 -
[50] - Quote
I think this would be fun Would make something that is a much better draw into Lowsec than the current Its like hisec, except anyone can shoot you freely, there are these giant ships that will kill you and your home for being in their place - that they will abandon in 10 minutes, and moon mining
Oh and a special componenet assembly array But hey at least you can do even more drugs! |
|
Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1559
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 16:18:00 -
[51] - Quote
Gypsio III wrote:Make all the bonuses of pirate faction ships dependent on the sec status of the pilot. Full bonus at -10 sec, no bonus at -5 sec.
That is the most stupid Idea i have ever seen... and that include Gevlon posts.... "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |
NEONOVUS
Diabolically Sexy Eureka-Secret Science R Us
903
|
Posted - 2014.08.18 17:07:00 -
[52] - Quote
I think it would be a fun plan, good reasoning too since the pirates dont have capsuleers galore for the most part. So you could say the more pirate crew the better the abilities.
Whereas the empires have capsuleer tech galore and thus make it common usage Hence why the Gurista valkyrie project thing is such an "oh ****" moment for the empires and everyone Especially as not even the Sansha figured i out. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |