EVE Search - Is their a way to make Items tabs in your hanger, kinda like a corp?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Is their a way to make Items tabs in your hanger, kinda like a corp?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Hellspawn01	Posted - 2006.07.02 15:29:00 - [1] Linkage Ship lovers click here
SpoolX	Posted - 2006.07.02 15:29:00 - [2] I want to be able to sort my items better in my hanger, is their a way to make tabs, or has anyone came up with a good way to sort things, right now I have a couple seperate bases, and would be nice to have it all in one base. Thanks Spool
SpoolX	Posted - 2006.07.02 15:38:00 - [3] are those the station containers?
HippoKing	Posted - 2006.07.02 15:39:00 - [4] yeah
Baldour Ngarr	Posted - 2006.07.02 15:41:00 - [5] General Freight Containers also work. they have the advantage of no locking/unlocking annoyance, but they're smaller, and more expensive. ________________________________________________ "I tried strip mining, but I lost, and it's cold flying around in space naked."
HippoKing	Posted - 2006.07.02 15:43:00 - [6] Originally by: Baldour Ngarr General Freight Containers also work. they have the advantage of no locking/unlocking annoyance, but they're smaller, and more expensive. we have a "do not lock" setting now
Baldour Ngarr	Posted - 2006.07.02 15:45:00 - [7] Originally by: HippoKing Originally by: Baldour Ngarr General Freight Containers also work. they have the advantage of no locking/unlocking annoyance, but they're smaller, and more expensive. we have a "do not lock" setting now COOL!! rushes off to find it ________________________________________________ "I tried strip mining, but I lost, and it's cold flying around in space naked."
Brutor Shaun	Posted - 2006.07.02 15:51:00 - [8] Originally by: Baldour Ngarr General Freight Containers also work. they have the advantage of no locking/unlocking annoyance, but they're smaller, and more expensive. And they do have one other advantage over station containers. If you ever up sticks and move, you can't take station containers with you.
Inc MuadDib	Posted - 2006.07.02 15:52:00 - [9] Until ability to browse/search container contents from remote location (see them in assets as subfolders perhaps) is implemented, using them is not so viable option, although I use it myself. If your activities are based around one solarsystem then it won't be a burden.
Baldour Ngarr	Posted - 2006.07.02 15:54:00 - [10] Originally by: Brutor Shaun Originally by: Baldour Ngarr General Freight Containers also work. they have the advantage of no locking/unlocking annoyance, but they're smaller, and more expensive. And they do have one other advantage over station containers. If you ever up sticks and move, you can't take station containers with you. Since I'm not a freighter pilot, I can't take the GFC's either ________________________________________________ "I tried strip mining, but I lost, and it's cold flying around in space naked."
Marcus Druallis	Posted - 2006.07.02 17:16:00 - [11] Thats why CCP needs to sell station containers in all 0.0 stations... WTF! --- Bigger BS Guns Ship Wreck
HippoKing	Posted - 2006.07.02 17:19:00 - [12] Originally by: Marcus Druallis Thats why CCP needs to sell station containers in all 0.0 stations... WTF! they need to seed the BPO
Apertotes	Posted - 2006.07.02 17:37:00 - [13] i use station containers but the most annoying thing for me is not being able to repacke items inside them. is it possible to do that on any other type of container? and also, why the need to repackage items? why couldnt all items be like ammo? Apertotes, the Guybrush Threepwood of New Eve
F'nog	Posted - 2006.07.02 17:43:00 - [14] Originally by: Apertotes and also, why the need to repackage items? why couldnt all items be like ammo? Because of database issues. All unpackaged items have a unique DB entry with their own stats based on (potential) damage taken. Repackaged items are all the same since they can't be damaged, so they take up less DB space. It's like having one entry, Car (5), versus red 1963 Corvette Stingray with white racing stripe, a ding in the door, 35,000 miles on the odometer, etc. Originally by: Panzer Goddess I podded wrangler, and all I got was this lousy forumban.
Apertotes	Posted - 2006.07.02 17:59:00 - [15] Originally by: F'nog Originally by: Apertotes and also, why the need to repackage items? why couldnt all items be like ammo? Because of database issues. All unpackaged items have a unique DB entry with their own stats based on (potential) damage taken. Repackaged items are all the same since they can't be damaged, so they take up less DB space. It's like having one entry, Car (5), versus red 1963 Corvette Stingray with white racing stripe, a ding in the door, 35,000 miles on the odometer, etc. ok, i understand. but why it is impossible to repackage items inside containers? is it also a DB issue? Apertotes, the Guybrush Threepwood of New Eve
F'nog	Posted - 2006.07.02 18:56:00 - [16] If I remember correctly, you used to be able to, but it was changed, I think in Exodus. So it's probably a resource issue. Maybe it was causing bugs in the DB entries or something. Originally by: Panzer Goddess I podded wrangler, and all I got was this lousy forumban.
Flash Landsraad	Posted - 2006.07.02 19:34:00 - [17] Could that be solved by making all items just not take damage? Or does damage reduce their effectiveness? If it doesn't what's the point of items being able to take damage?
Dahak2150	Posted - 2006.07.02 22:11:00 - [18] Originally by: Flash Landsraad Could that be solved by making all items just not take damage? Or does damage reduce their effectiveness? If it doesn't what's the point of items being able to take damage? Can't say anything about mods, but drones cease to function once they hit a certain % structure. You can still pick them up and repair them later, but in the mean time they don't help.
Apocalyptical	Posted - 2006.07.02 22:17:00 - [19] They need to make something like plastic wrap. You can fill it with anything and it just takes the size of its contents and can be put on freighters, this would make sorting mutiple peoples stuff alot easier. Just release the bpo and have the reqs like 200 trit.

Abdalion	Posted - 2006.07.02 22:17:00 - [20] Originally by: HippoKing Originally by: Baldour Ngarr General Freight Containers also work. they have the advantage of no locking/unlocking annoyance, but they're smaller, and more expensive. we have a "do not lock" setting now Glad this setting doesn't work on the forums! ___

Shintoko Akahoshi	Posted - 2006.07.02 23:28:00 - [21] I've gotta chime in on the "can't remote search, can't remote browse" issue. I have a huge pile of mods in several different stations. For a while I did the station container thing, and I was pretty pleased by it - despite everything auto-locking when you moved it into the container (this was before the "do not lock" option). The thing that killed it for me, though, is the inability to remotely browse or search the contents of the containers. Now I'm back to just having really, really full hangars that I can search. The Red Mom of WarÖ
SavageThrash	Posted - 2006.07.03 01:00:00 - [22] tbh we need a repair, repacked stack button all in one.
Tehyarec	Posted - 2006.07.03 12:05:00 - [23] I've been thinking of giving up on containers to arrange my hangar too. The lack of searching just makes finding things a major pain in the butt They really should introduce "compartmentalized" player hangars. Silverleaf Foundation Website & Shop
Tyranical Teabagger	Posted - 2006.07.03 17:42:00 - [24] yes they do. Just give players the same thing you have for the corp. It'd be so much easier to keep track of. As of now if you have a lot of assets in your hanger it's really gets to be a pain in the butt.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.