| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Colonel Falkenberg
The Scope
Gallente Federation
0
   |
Posted - 2014.09.23 03:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
Damon Messer wrote:Renegade Heart wrote:13 nonames wrote:no more criminal driving around hi security space seeing as a so call advanced society would not have wanted criminal walking the street I just reread this and perhaps you are right! No more NPC criminals with bounties in high sec either. No more missions in high sec! Let's not ruin the realism of this advanced society you speak of eh? All that stuff can be moved to low sec. This is a really good idea OP. +1 remove all security agents in highsec. only mining, distribution, and research agents.
Lock all guns while in Hi-Sec. You can't shoot, nobody can shoot you. Totally safe.
To balance things out though... move ALL ore except Trit to low/null. Nerf trit amounts in hi-sec... if your going to mine afk, time does not matter anymore.
A safe society cost ISK to maintain, therefore all NPC corps need to raise taxes to 75%. Increase cost also on all transactions in Hi-Sec. Safety is not cheap.
Of course trade hubs will move to where the product is...
|
Colonel Falkenberg
The Scope
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.09.23 15:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Froggy Storm wrote:Just put a moratorium on activation of any high slot module. Heck don't even have to do any special code or mechanic changes. Tie all highslot modules to the safety system. If you turn one on, be it a miner, gun, or link then you go suspect. Problems are all solved.
Or maybe we should just get rid of Hi-Sec altogether? It's time the empires went to war anyway.
|
Colonel Falkenberg
DEATH HEAD SUICIDE SQUAD
3
|
Posted - 2014.09.24 01:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:I agree with OP....there need to be much harsher punishments for career -10 sec status suicide gankers, beyond a 15 minute timeout. The aggression timer should be based on ganking history and sec status, resulting in longer penalties for career gankers.
No.
They are -10. Go kill them. Don't ask CCP to do your work for you.
|
Colonel Falkenberg
DEATH HEAD SUICIDE SQUAD
5
|
Posted - 2014.09.24 14:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:
I'm not sure what you are trying to say. I fly expensive ships worth billions of isk, entering into a limited engagement with a ganker would entail major risk for me. Even just flying around with the possibility of being ganked carries significant risk. Not so for dedicated gank alts who fly cheap gank ships that they expect to lose anyway. Their total possible risk exposure is ship + pod, which is often worth 100x less than my ship + pod. So yes, their choice to fly cheap gank ships is a form of risk aversion, much like my choice to fly expensive ships is a form of risk taking. But that is fine, what troubles me is a) how easy it is for a gang of gankalysts to destroy my extremely expensive battleship, and b) the lack of real consequences to them of doing so, despite their being career criminal suicide gankers.
EVE rule # 1
-Never undock in a ship you can't afford to replace.
|
Colonel Falkenberg
DEATH HEAD SUICIDE SQUAD
6
|
Posted - 2014.09.24 14:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Colonel Falkenberg wrote:
EVE rule # 1
-Never undock in a ship you can't afford to replace.
Well I can certainly afford to replace it. It doesn't change the fact that game mechanics make it easy for a swarm of cheap ships to gank a much more expensive one, or the fact that dedicated -10 gank alts can still effectively spend their time suicide ganking with no more punishment than a 15 minute slap on the wrist from CONCORD after the destruction of their cheap gank ship.
Well... life is a ***** sometimes. Adapt. Overcome.
|
Colonel Falkenberg
DEATH HEAD SUICIDE SQUAD
6
|
Posted - 2014.09.24 22:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
People. This is a waste of time. Veers will never except, adapt, or change his views. He is the man, the purpose, the idea of what EVE should be (in his mind).
Rule # 2. Tired of listening to a troll? Stop feeding it. |
Colonel Falkenberg
DEATH HEAD SUICIDE SQUAD
6
|
Posted - 2014.09.24 22:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:
They already tried and gave up. I'm too competent for CODE, they go after the ships that dont shoot back. You are welcome to come try and gank me....better bring a whole bunch of buddies, might need the entire CFC to pull it off.
OK, just let us know where you are.
|
| |
|