That looks pretty much like it was written with Latex :) Very usefull thanks. But i-¦m missing a list of what team influences what kind of material.

e.g. whats affects
Crystalline Carbonide Armor Plate Blueprint
Oscillator Capacitor Unit Blueprint
Pulse Shield Emitter Blueprint
and the other from this category.
The broad specialty is Construction Components right? but What is the narrow specialty?

the table is really good thanks for adding it. and for sharing the .tex :)
but is "Hybrid" really a broad specialization? What kind of items should this affect ? (I know it is kinda off topic; sry for that)

Optimized Nano-engines
Warfare Computation Core
Emergent Neurovisual Interface
Fullerene Intercalated Sheets
Reinforced Metallofullerene Alloys
Metallofullerene Plating
Electromechanical Interface Nexus
Neurovisual Output Analyzer
Nanowire Composites
Fulleroferrocene Power Conduits
Reconfigured Subspace Calibrator

Your invention chance formula is slightly different from the one I've been using:

https://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/2013/05/23/manufacturing-201-tech-2/

For most cases they are pretty close but you can get them to diverge quite drastically if you use a high meta component.

Yes, that's because yours is wrong outdated. See https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=361543

Thanks for the formulas.

Are there other formulas to deduce the ME and TE of a T2 blueprint after invention from T1 blueprint ME/TE and the items used ?

Thanks for the formulas.

Are there other formulas to deduce the ME and TE of a T2 blueprint after invention from T1 blueprint ME/TE and the items used ?

Invention subtracts one run from a T1 BPC and produces a BPC for the T2 version with ME -2%, TE -4% and a number of runs remaining that is type specific. For ships, rigs and Perpetual Motion Unit II there is one run remaining, Rapid Heavy Missile Launcher II has 20, all other blueprints have 10. If a decryptor is used, it can also change the ME/TE values as well as the number of runs remaining on the T2 BPC. The ME/TE and runs remaining of the input blueprint have no effect on invention.

this is an amazing document, thx Qoi!!!

I have a few suggestions however that would make it even more awesome :)

You list all the different variables that are needed for these calc's, but there is no mention of where these come from.

If at all possible, listing this info in the appendix would be incredible!

1318:
activities:
1:
materials:
37:
quantity: 10
38:
quantity: 1
products:
1317:
quantity: 1
skills:
3380:
level: 1
time: 900
3:
time: 315
4:
time: 315
5:
time: 720
8:
materials:
20415:
quantity: 2
20416:
quantity: 2
25553:
consume: false
quantity: 1
products:
1320:
probability: 0.4
quantity: 10
skills:
11442:
level: 1
11529:
level: 1
21791:
level: 1
time: 13800
blueprintTypeID: 1318
maxProductionLimit: 200

Regarding the formula "Required Materials for Production Job":
I needed to round to 3 digits instead of 2 to get correct results for large batches (576 runs on POS fuel).

Just to confirm, it is now possible for a T2 ship to use for instance, 2 T1 ships to make 1 T2 finished product. Is that correct? As using the given formula that seems to be the case.

Also, I haven't tried inventing any T2 BPCs yet, although I thought they were going to be ME 0 by default, although according to the pdf they are -2 ME. Is this correct?

Thanks very much for the good pdf also, nice info in there.

Just to confirm, it is now possible for a T2 ship to use for instance, 2 T1 ships to make 1 T2 finished product. Is that correct? As using the given formula that seems to be the case.

Also, I haven't tried inventing any T2 BPCs yet, although I thought they were going to be ME 0 by default, although according to the pdf they are -2 ME. Is this correct?

Thanks very much for the good pdf also, nice info in there.

First of all, thanks for your excellent pdf, this is pretty much the only source on Crius manufacture around.

However, I'm a bit confused by your formula for materials required and would appreciate some clarification. Here's what I'm confused about in your formula required=max(runs,ceil(round(runs*baseQuantity*materialModifier,2)):
- it seem to me that ",2" part is redundant as there's no way the result of runs*baseQuantity*materialModifier could have more than 2 digits after comma anyway;
- why ceil(round(X,2))? It seem to me that simple ceil(X) (or roundup if in excel) will yield totally same result (within the range of what's possible in eve manufacturing, obviously: it might work differently for negative values, but this is not the case here).

Or did I miss something?

You see it far more often with programming languages, because they don't try and make things easy on you. Applications like Excel add in logic to 'deal' with it. Probably by just checking for that 0.0000000000000000000001

Yep, I watched the video you kindly provided, so I figured this much. But then, if Excel applies additional logic to revert binary results to what we expect in decimal maths, is there a way to correctly simulate in Excel Eve engine calculations that use raw binary maths as results?

That's what the round(,2) is there for. It just eliminates the 0.00000001

The new RE formula is from dev blog. It confirms the changed in crius chances of success, shown in industry interface for intact relics (decrease from 84% to 82% with perfect skills). For malfunctioned relics the chance shown in industry interface is 71,7% with perfect skills (was 63% pre crius), which uses base chance of 35% (according to formula). Probably the same calculation is valid for wrecked relics, but I have not made calculations myself. I suppose Qoi used this info from industry interface to determine new base chance for malfuncioned and wrecked relics.

The new RE formula is from dev blog. It confirms the changed in crius chances of success, shown in industry interface for intact relics (decrease from 84% to 82% with perfect skills). For malfunctioned relics the chance shown in industry interface is 71,7% with perfect skills (was 63% pre crius), which uses base chance of 35% (according to formula). Probably the same calculation is valid for wrecked relics, but I have not made calculations myself. I suppose Qoi used this info from industry interface to determine new base chance for malfuncioned and wrecked relics.

Where do I get the 'adjustedPrice' data? Is that a whole set of different prices for all the materials required to make something that is hidden away somewhere?

Where do I get the 'adjustedPrice' data? Is that a whole set of different prices for all the materials required to make something that is hidden away somewhere?

From here: http://public-crest.eveonline.com/market/prices/
These are magical values that CCP uses to mitigate any attempts of players to impact the installation cost by manipulating the market

Qoi great work on compiling this. Is a good single-point-resource for detailed overview of inner workings for post-crius industry.

One thing that caught my eye is regarding the "Total Job Installation Costs" section of paragraph 5. I think "teamCostModifier" should instead be "teamCostRate" to be consistent with how percentage/decimal values are expressed in the rest of the document