EVE Search - Should C6 wormholes have 2 statics?

All Channels

Wormholes

Should C6 wormholes have 2 statics?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Rek Seven Probe Patrol Ixtab. 1736	Posted - 2014.08.15 14:54:00 - [1] - Quote The question is in the title. My reasoning is that as all odd numbered classes (c1, 3 & 5) have one static, should all even classes have 2 statics? I think it would make C6 wormholes more desirable for big PVP groups and clearly set them apart from C5s... Thoughts? +1
MooMooDachshundCow Incertae Sedis 30	Posted - 2014.08.15 15:00:00 - [2] - Quote Rek Seven wrote: The question is in the title. My reasoning is that as all odd numbered classes (c1, 3 & 5) have one static, should all even classes have 2 statics? I think it would make C6 wormholes more desirable for big PVP groups and clearly set them apart from C5s... Thoughts? Yeah, why not give the all a C6 static so it becomes like a real highway
Sith1s Spectre Rolled Out 1153	Posted - 2014.08.15 15:00:00 - [3] - Quote I think so. Only because then that would surely give people to something to fight over. only 100 of them, of that 10 of them really decent. Dual statics and capital escalations. What's not to like? Rolled Out 2.0 is back. -áBut not in the way you're probably thinking-á
Obil Que Star Explorers Reckoning Star Alliance 94	Posted - 2014.08.15 15:02:00 - [4] - Quote Rek Seven wrote: The question is in the title. My reasoning is that as all odd numbered classes (c1, 3 & 5) have one static, should all even classes have 2 statics? I think it would make C6 wormholes more desirable for big PVP groups and clearly set them apart from C5s... Thoughts? Of course, to C7 space naturally :)
Hans Bonderstadt Codename-47 40	Posted - 2014.08.15 15:22:00 - [5] - Quote I like it, hole rolling will become more tedious, so making more connections might be a good thing
calaretu Honestly We didnt know Unsettled. 141	Posted - 2014.08.15 15:32:00 - [6] - Quote Admit it Rek. You want to move into c4 space now ; P ~Bringer of happiness http://collapsedbehind.blogspot.no/
Rek Seven Probe Patrol Ixtab. 1736	Posted - 2014.08.15 15:48:00 - [7] - Quote I kind of do want to move to a C4 +1
calaretu Honestly We didnt know Unsettled. 143	Posted - 2014.08.15 16:17:00 - [8] - Quote Rek Seven wrote: I kind of do want to move to a C4 We are recruiting :P ~Bringer of happiness http://collapsedbehind.blogspot.no/
Jezza McWaffle Pandora Sphere Disavowed. 139	Posted - 2014.08.15 16:44:00 - [9] - Quote I also considered the possibility of moving to a C4 with these changes :D C6 Wormhole blog http://holelotofwaffle.wordpress.com/
calaretu Honestly We didnt know Unsettled. 143	Posted - 2014.08.15 16:47:00 - [10] - Quote Jezza McWaffle wrote: I also considered the possibility of moving to a C4 with these changes :D Huei is also recruiting :P ~Bringer of happiness http://collapsedbehind.blogspot.no/
Jack Miton Isogen 5 3669	Posted - 2014.08.15 22:20:00 - [11] - Quote calaretu wrote: Rek Seven wrote: I kind of do want to move to a C4 We are recruiting :P even rek? Stuck In Here With Me:-á http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/ Down the Pipe:-á http://downthepipe-wh.com/
Winthorp 2560	Posted - 2014.08.15 22:28:00 - [12] - Quote Honestly the only think that can fix C6 space is giving you another 400 empty C6 WH's to screw the % of predictability and stop you people from yourselves.
Xuixien The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People 1475	Posted - 2014.08.15 23:07:00 - [13] - Quote People live outside of C5's and C6's? Epic Space Cat
Rockenator Unreal Darkness 1	Posted - 2014.08.16 12:28:00 - [14] - Quote The static holes are a bit against the idea of random spawning WHs in my mind. The only thing that makes since is that maybe there would be somekind of attraction to a particular region or even constellation but it really shouldnt have anything todo with security. The WHs arent made by concord after all. Or are they???
AssassinationsdoneWrong The Nexus 7's 241	Posted - 2014.08.16 13:49:00 - [15] - Quote I don't see why C6s should get any love so I'm with the Throp on this. You already have a class and real seperation from C5's in that they actually have class and you don't. C6 blocs demand payment of the toll or gtfo. C5's don't. Other than making it easier to get your stuff in and out there's no advantage for the W community as a whole other than enticing more victims to your eviction and extortion cycles. The Nexus 7's What we fall short of in numbers we more than make up for in stupidity
Trinkets friend Sudden Buggery 1563	Posted - 2014.08.17 14:24:00 - [16] - Quote Yeah, nah. J's before K's. Sudden Buggery is recruiting w-nerds and w-noobs. Mail your resume in today! http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
Rek Seven Probe Patrol Ixtab. 1736	Posted - 2014.08.17 21:27:00 - [17] - Quote AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote: Other than making it easier to get your stuff in and out there's no advantage for the W community as a whole other than enticing more victims to your eviction and extortion cycles. What if the second static lead to null or (in the future) the new space CCP is building? +1
Trinkets friend Sudden Buggery 1563	Posted - 2014.08.18 00:19:00 - [18] - Quote We need to properly use the space we have. new space is just more empty space with no one and nothing doing. J's before K's. Sudden Buggery is recruiting w-nerds and w-noobs. Mail your resume in today! http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
Rek Seven Probe Patrol Ixtab. 1737	Posted - 2014.08.18 08:51:00 - [19] - Quote Agreed but how do WE do that if CCP is unwilling to add new reasons for people to live in wormholes? +1
Pavel Sohaj Anoikis Exploration 40	Posted - 2014.08.18 08:57:00 - [20] - Quote Rek if you are so keen, ill sell you our WH for cheap :D C4 with C4 and C5. Highway to emptiness!
AssassinationsdoneWrong The Nexus 7's 251	Posted - 2014.08.18 09:57:00 - [21] - Quote Rek Seven wrote: AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote: Other than making it easier to get your stuff in and out there's no advantage for the W community as a whole other than enticing more victims to your eviction and extortion cycles. What if the second static lead to null or (in the future) the new space CCP is building? Why? C6 chains have so many null outlets I don't see the point. There may be pilots with guns n stuff in those chains though so I kind of get it. Also, what Trinks said. The Nexus 7's What we fall short of in numbers we more than make up for in stupidity
Rek Seven Probe Patrol Ixtab. 1737	Posted - 2014.08.18 17:18:00 - [22] - Quote AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote: Rek Seven wrote: AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote: Other than making it easier to get your stuff in and out there's no advantage for the W community as a whole other than enticing more victims to your eviction and extortion cycles. What if the second static lead to null or (in the future) the new space CCP is building? Why? C6 chains have so many null outlets I don't see the point. There may be pilots with guns n stuff in those chains though so I kind of get it. You don't see the advantage in having a rollable, guarantied exit to null or more importantly, the "new space"? I moved out of C6 wormholes a while ago because it was pretty boring and they didn't offer any real advantage over C5 space. In case i didn't make it clear enough in the OP, i think C6 should be better that C5 wormholes, which is why i suggested this change. Does anyone have a real reason why this would be such a terrible idea other that "because C6 guys are mean to me."? +1
Agrippa Arkaral Vertical Rebirth 4	Posted - 2014.08.18 18:01:00 - [23] - Quote Would move into a C6/6/6. Main reason to live in a C6, especially those with a C5 or lower static, is the site respawn rate. C5 when constantly farmed has about 1 or 2 sites on average. A C6 when constantly farmed has an average of 8 sites. In both of the C6's I have lived in, I have never seen that we had less than 4. Reason to live in a C6 with a C6 static is, beside the sites you have, is that C6 space is generally a lot more crowded - you simply run into a lot less empty systems than compared with C5 space. Why give two statics to a C6? Why do wormholes have a static? Why not make C6s have 3 statics? Right now they simply have one. Giving them an extra static "because 2 and 4 have it too, and 6 is an even number" seems a lacking reason.
Rek Seven Probe Patrol Ixtab. 1737	Posted - 2014.08.18 18:25:00 - [24] - Quote That's more or less the feedback that i was looking for and you make some good points. I guess if isk is your only motivator then you do have an incentive to live in a C6. Agrippa, do you live in a C6 now and if not, would your choose a duel static c6 over a single static c5? +1
Agrippa Arkaral Vertical Rebirth 4	Posted - 2014.08.18 18:53:00 - [25] - Quote Right now I do not live in a C6. A C6/5 and a C5/5 are very similar, except that you have a lot more sites in a C6 and the fact that large entities can roll into you at inconvenient times. Personally I prefer a C5/5 to any kind of C6. This is basically because large entities live in a C6, they have a lot of mouths to feed, and for :SRP: have to run sites everyday. Multiple hour grind sessions, every day (and sometimes even in primetime :cripes:), is not why I want to be in wormhole space - I want to shoot stuff, get capital killmails and have fun leading a fleet. That is why I dislike a C6. I would prefer a C5/5 because a C5 is a bit more secluded and you can rageroll to catch farmers from your C5 static). I do not really see a reason to add a second static to a C6. It is not like C6s are not in a good place - I think they are, and I think most people that live in a C6 would agree with that. C6 also has enough connections to K-space, both HS, LS and 0.0 (always had). There are also quite a few C6s with a lower class static - people with a class 6 static can find systems of all classes in their chain, and can take part in all kinds of pvp that wormhole space has to offer.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.