| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Faraboot
BALKAN EXPRESS
1
   |
Posted - 2014.08.21 06:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
I noticed one little thing that keeps getting overlooked, and it wasn't mentioned in a dev blog regarding Incursion changes in Hyperion, and that is low sec Incursions.
For example, there are always 2 Incursion sites in both high sec and null, but always 1 site in low sec. May I ask is there a valid reason for this? |
Sara Tosa
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
81
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 07:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
Faraboot wrote:I noticed one little thing that keeps getting overlooked, and it wasn't mentioned in a dev blog regarding Incursion changes in Hyperion, and that is low sec Incursions.
For example, there are always 2 Incursion sites in both high sec and null, but always 1 site in low sec. May I ask is there a valid reason for this?
numbers, lowsec population is a wasteland. |
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
2468
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 09:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
That is somewhat strange from RP perspective as Sanshas Incursions should flourish in such an enviroment, when everyone is fighting everyone and there is none of Concord or Huge null sec empires to face, so Sanshas with their organised raids should make a lot of slaves from locals. Or they in fact taken them all before and only few are left to be enslaved. 
When weapons, technology, and economies mature faster than the leadership culture entrusted with them, disaster ensues.
http://i.minus.com/ibeZ0sJewvDMBN.gif =ƒÿü |
Faraboot
BALKAN EXPRESS
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 10:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sara Tosa wrote:numbers, lowsec population is a wasteland.
can't really agree with you on that one. any other thoughts? |
Sara Tosa
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
81
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 11:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
Faraboot wrote:Sara Tosa wrote:numbers, lowsec population is a wasteland. can't really agree with you on that one. any other thoughts?
as you wish, its not like we dont have statistics showing high, low and null population anywere. |
Faraboot
BALKAN EXPRESS
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 11:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sara Tosa wrote:Faraboot wrote:Sara Tosa wrote:numbers, lowsec population is a wasteland. can't really agree with you on that one. any other thoughts? as you wish, its not like we dont have statistics showing high, low and null population anywere.
ok, so your original thought is basically one that ccp is keen on providing more content to more populated areas, rather than provide content to attract people to less populated areas?
also, in terms of activity such as pvp, can you really say that low sec is on the bottom list? couple of highly profiled fights comes to mind.. |
Pok Nibin
Filial Pariahs
402
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
There's no valid reason to have incursions.
Dont fight it; Rejoin your Amarrian patriarchs; You know you want to. |
Faraboot
BALKAN EXPRESS
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:09:00 -
[8] - Quote
Pok Nibin wrote:There's no valid reason to have incursions.
but since we do, why does the low sec has less than the rest of new eden? |
Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders
Repeat 0ffenders
1865
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:10:00 -
[9] - Quote
Faraboot wrote:Pok Nibin wrote:There's no valid reason to have incursions. but since we do, why does the low sec has less than the rest of new eden? Hopefully it's all part of a CCP secret troll plan to eliminate highsec incursions altogether and have 3 incursions in lowsec. 
Make space glamorous!
Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter! |
fudface
ACME-INC
59
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:14:00 -
[10] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:That is somewhat strange from RP perspective as Sanshas Incursions should flourish in such an enviroment, when everyone is fighting everyone and there is none of Concord or Huge null sec empires to face, so Sanshas with their organised raids should make a lot of slaves from locals. Or they in fact taken them all before and only few are left to be enslaved.
If you are saying make the losec incursion spread further and further taking more and more systems, spreading like a plague, left unchallenged by us ? then i say yes plus 1
make incursions a plague that spreads if its not destroyed. Incursion 2.0
my 2 isk worth |
Sara Tosa
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
81
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:15:00 -
[11] - Quote
Faraboot wrote:Sara Tosa wrote:Faraboot wrote:Sara Tosa wrote:numbers, lowsec population is a wasteland. can't really agree with you on that one. any other thoughts? as you wish, its not like we dont have statistics showing high, low and null population anywere. ok, so your original thought is basically one that ccp is keen on providing more content to more populated areas, rather than provide content to attract people to less populated areas?
their resources arent free, why they should waste cpu time on things nobody uses?
who is actually running that low sec incursion? if nobody bother with one, why they should add more?
|
Sara Tosa
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
81
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:17:00 -
[12] - Quote
double post, server hickcupped. |
Faraboot
BALKAN EXPRESS
1
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:31:00 -
[13] - Quote
Sara Tosa wrote:Faraboot wrote:Sara Tosa wrote:Faraboot wrote:Sara Tosa wrote:numbers, lowsec population is a wasteland. can't really agree with you on that one. any other thoughts? as you wish, its not like we dont have statistics showing high, low and null population anywere. ok, so your original thought is basically one that ccp is keen on providing more content to more populated areas, rather than provide content to attract people to less populated areas? their resources arent free, why they should waste cpu time on things nobody uses? who is actually running that low sec incursion? if nobody bother with one, why they should add more?
using that logic they could wipe out half of new eden for that matter, keep jita, ammar, and couple more 'used' places. but somehow i don't think that's the reasoning behind the fact that since the introduction of incursions, there were always 2 incursions in high sec and 2 in null, and 1 in low sec.
as for running them, there are lots of people that used to ran them, myself included (not sure about anymore), but only if it didn't require jumping across half of new eden. |
Belesia Velorea
Bunch of Noobs Logistics
14
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 12:33:00 -
[14] - Quote
I hope they don't add more to lowsec, every time the Incursion shows up in my area the whole place grinds to a halt for it's duration. FW dies down, no one goes out ratting or mining, locals vanish for a while, it's really not nice. Not for me atleast. It's just an inconvinience every time they show up for a day or two. |
Tarpedo
Incursionista
1366
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:12:00 -
[15] - Quote
3 incursions in null, 1 in low, 3 in high sec. Despite popular opinion size matters. |
Solecist Project
Mew Age Outpaws
6946
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:39:00 -
[16] - Quote
Is anyone doing lowsec incursions?
The highseccers?
Surely not, right?
http://residentoutlaw.tumblr.com - CODE, RvB, the AT, and what DJEntropy said .... :)
The Mew Age Calender is in need of models! Plus payment!
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4908292#post4908292 |
Kitty Bear
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam
Disturbed Acquaintance
1395
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:46:00 -
[17] - Quote
Faraboot wrote:Pok Nibin wrote:There's no valid reason to have incursions. but since we do, why does the low sec has less than the rest of new eden?
sansha paid the ransom
you blew them up anyway
now they don't trust you anymore |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Ixtab.
1752
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 13:52:00 -
[18] - Quote
So do the Sansha pay CONCORD off so that they are free to snatch civilians off planets?
It would be better if all CONCORD actions were prevented during incursions, then CCP could triple the payouts for all i care. Right now, the risk vs. reward is shockingly unbalanced.
+1 |
Caviar Liberta
Moira.
Villore Accords
655
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 14:17:00 -
[19] - Quote
Faraboot wrote:Sara Tosa wrote:Faraboot wrote:Sara Tosa wrote:numbers, lowsec population is a wasteland. can't really agree with you on that one. any other thoughts? as you wish, its not like we dont have statistics showing high, low and null population anywere. ok, so your original thought is basically one that ccp is keen on providing more content to more populated areas, rather than provide content to attract people to less populated areas? also, in terms of activity such as pvp, can you really say that low sec is on the bottom list? couple of highly profiled fights comes to mind..
And of recent the systems that Gal Mil has taken have been some of the most violent pvp systems in game. |
Hicksimus
The Scope
Gallente Federation
272
|
Posted - 2014.08.21 19:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
Let's just be clear that we only got incursions because it was an expansion in that period where CCP had 5 people working on EvE. Somebody went oh my god we need an expansion idea! Hilmar said......let's copy and paste sleeper AI, make a couple of new spreadsheets and call it an expansion!
As for why only 1 in lowsec. It's no secret that CCP does not care about lowsec. It's just a place for bored folks from nullsec and people too lazy to head to nullsec.....oh and FW alts in some spots.
Do you have it? |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |