EVE Search - New WH art

All Channels

Wormholes

New WH art

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Winthorp 2685	Posted - 2014.09.05 07:46:00 - [1] - Quote Source: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=371353&find=unread Since CCP take ages to do blogs here thought i would cross post yet another WH pertinent thread.
HerrBert V0LTA Triumvirate. 506	Posted - 2014.09.05 09:25:00 - [2] - Quote This comes to mind and yeah .. so when can we actually see "changes"? I mean the community asked for some serious ****, is there any info on pos changes? Or will oceanus include a life action fishing simulator? Community-Challenge: Make Jack Miton sing a Duett with me. http://www.youtube.com/user/HerrBertism Jibbychiggawooooow - CSM 9 Corbexx
Andrew Jester Origin. Black Legion. 667	Posted - 2014.09.05 12:03:00 - [3] - Quote HerrBert wrote: This comes to mind and yeah .. so when can we actually see "changes"? I mean the community asked for some serious **, is there any info on pos changes? Or will oceanus include a life action fishing simulator? YES PLEASE LET'S HAVE THE ART TEAM WORK ON POS STUFF THAT CODE WILL BE EVEN BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAVE NOW Different teams do different . Art team isn't going to change POSes. Art team makes thing look nice. Enjoy what it is and don't complain about dumb ** that's out of their control. If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy
James Rapture Dead Star Syndicate 4	Posted - 2014.09.05 12:07:00 - [4] - Quote +1 for more WH eye candy.
Caleb Seremshur The Atomic Fallout Kids 356	Posted - 2014.09.05 12:26:00 - [5] - Quote I'd really prefer gameplay changes first over artistic ones. Maybe update the sleeper models to be more highly detailed etc if you must utilise your art team, but please don't forget the lessons of stonesoup and dwarf fortress - art is icing on a cake. Icing won't save a bad tasting cake from scrutiny. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=348015 T3 OHing subsystem review and rebalance https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=290346 LP faction weapon store costs rebalancing
Icarus Able Revenant Tactical 476	Posted - 2014.09.05 12:47:00 - [6] - Quote Andrew Jester wrote: HerrBert wrote: This comes to mind and yeah .. so when can we actually see "changes"? I mean the community asked for some serious **, is there any info on pos changes? Or will oceanus include a life action fishing simulator? YES PLEASE LET'S HAVE THE ART TEAM WORK ON POS STUFF THAT CODE WILL BE EVEN BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAVE NOW Different teams do different . Art team isn't going to change POSes. Art team makes thing look nice. Enjoy what it is and don't complain about dumb ** that's out of their control. I dunno. With how long CCP takes to do stuff maybe they should give the art team a shot at mashing randomly on their keyboards. Might produce something decent more quickly.
Seraph Essael Devils Diciples League of Infamy 849	Posted - 2014.09.05 13:58:00 - [7] - Quote If they're making the game look cleaner, more refined and smoother graphics, I am all for that. The art department aren't the same people who work on coding POS's, their job is simply to make the game look nicer. Something they are doing a fine job of. I saw the same arguments in the thread I posted on General Discussion. Complaining that the art department are not working on coding is like complaining that you took a PC into a construction company to be fixed and they couldn't. Something as small as tweaking code to make things look nicer is no way near the same and as big as POS coding. I would love to see the coding for POS fixed (hell there's plenty that we have asked for that we have yet to get) but the art department really aren't the ones to change that. The fact they're upping the graphics for cloak, holes etc I think it awesome. Quoted from Doc Fury: "Concerned citizens: Doc seldom plays EVE on the weekends during spring and summer, so you will always be on your own for a couple days a week. Doc spends that time collecting kittens for the on-going sacrifices, engaging in reckless outdoor activities, and speaking in the 3rd person."
Andrew Jester Origin. Black Legion. 667	Posted - 2014.09.05 14:01:00 - [8] - Quote Caleb Seremshur wrote: I'd really prefer gameplay changes first over artistic ones. Maybe update the sleeper models to be more highly detailed etc if you must utilise your art team, but please don't forget the lessons of stonesoup and dwarf fortress - art is icing on a cake. Icing won't save a bad tasting cake from scrutiny. THE ** ELSE IS THE ART TEAM GOING TO DO EXCEPT ART Holy ** how are you this dumb jesus christ. Once again, "LET'S JUST LET THE ART TEAM DO CODING AND MAKE GAMEPLAY CHANGES". Like do you even think before you speak? Or do you just puke on your keyboard and whatever keys the chunks hit that's what you type? If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy
Jack Miton Isogen 5 3787	Posted - 2014.09.05 14:58:00 - [9] - Quote Some SUPER special comments here.... You know it's a problem when Jester's the one calling you on your sh!t and making the most sense in a thread >_< PS: Shiny WHs are shiny, i guess Stuck In Here With Me:-á http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/ Down the Pipe:-á http://downthepipe-wh.com/
Viscis Breeze No Vacancies 59	Posted - 2014.09.05 16:07:00 - [10] - Quote Andrew Jester wrote: Caleb Seremshur wrote: I'd really prefer gameplay changes first over artistic ones. Maybe update the sleeper models to be more highly detailed etc if you must utilise your art team, but please don't forget the lessons of stonesoup and dwarf fortress - art is icing on a cake. Icing won't save a bad tasting cake from scrutiny. THE ** ELSE IS THE ART TEAM GOING TO DO EXCEPT ART Holy how are you this dumb jesus christ. Once again, "LET'S JUST LET THE ART TEAM DO CODING AND MAKE GAMEPLAY CHANGES". Like do you even think before you speak? Or do you just puke on your keyboard and whatever keys the chunks hit that's what you type? Damn you Jester, I'm not meant to ** myself laughing at work. Recruitment: http://bit.ly/1r4G5Pv Website: http://www.no-vacancies.net/ Channel: No Vacancies
Alundil Isogen 5 659	Posted - 2014.09.06 01:46:00 - [11] - Quote Jack Miton wrote: Some SUPER special comments here.... You know it's a problem when Jester's the one calling you on your sh!t and making the most sense in a thread >_< PS: Shiny WHs are shiny, i guess Very much this. I'm right behind you
Andrew Jester Origin. Black Legion. 671	Posted - 2014.09.06 01:52:00 - [12] - Quote Jack Miton wrote: Jester's the one making the most sense saved for posterity If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 254	Posted - 2014.09.06 02:11:00 - [13] - Quote Winthorp wrote: Source: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=371353&find=unread Since CCP take ages to do blogs here thought i would cross post yet another WH pertinent thread. Winthrop where is your post about the cloaky graphic change. Your slipping man. You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure
Winthorp 2689	Posted - 2014.09.06 02:18:00 - [14] - Quote Hatshepsut IV wrote: Winthorp wrote: Source: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=371353&find=unread Since CCP take ages to do blogs here thought i would cross post yet another WH pertinent thread. Winthrop where is your post about the cloaky graphic change. Your slipping man. I am only one man.
Caleb Seremshur The Atomic Fallout Kids 356	Posted - 2014.09.07 10:19:00 - [15] - Quote Special comments indeed. Is this why jester keeps getting his posts deleted? If you're a graphic>game play kinda guy you're in the wrong game. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=348015 T3 OHing subsystem review and rebalance https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=290346 LP faction weapon store costs rebalancing
Andrew Jester Origin. Black Legion. 673	Posted - 2014.09.07 16:57:00 - [16] - Quote Caleb Seremshur wrote: Special comments indeed. Is this why jester keeps getting his posts deleted? If you're a graphic>game play kinda guy you're in the wrong game. If you're a ****** kind of guy you're in the wrong game too, but you're still playing. How the ** are you having so much difficulty drilling the fact that different teams do different things into your head? The art team does art, so how does what they do affect game play? Like you can't be this dumb it's just not possible. If you are, pls just castrate yourself for the good of the human race. If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy
Caleb Seremshur The Atomic Fallout Kids 356	Posted - 2014.09.07 20:15:00 - [17] - Quote You fail hard at reading comprehension. Go and re read my post above way above again. Oh p.s. new blackholes? Called it. Burner missions? Called it. Module tiericide? Called it. Extra wormhole connections? Called that too. I been on the money for a fair while now. Just wait and see if some other suggestions/predictions come true. Art team should be remaking crappy sleeper/drone/structure models. Projects like new nebulae are 'apparently' really expensive. A new ship model can be done in a guys spare time. Don't believe me? Just look at kickstarter projects or any overhaul mod released in like the last 20 years and tell me again that some dude with a 3d modelling program couldn't do a better job than flying space potatoes like we see now. Results speak louder than your pathetic insults. Maybe you can get a 30 day holiday from EVE to sharpen you up. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=348015 T3 OHing subsystem review and rebalance https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=290346 LP faction weapon store costs rebalancing

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.