| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sarmaul
0utbreak
   |
Posted - 2006.07.31 23:31:00 -
[31]
 Originally by: R3dj4ck Ry4n
Originally by: Sarmaul
Give Amarr a gank Destroyer, Caldari a missile Destroyer (T1 Flycatcher), Gallente a drone Destroyer and Minmatar an AC Destroyer (T1 Sabre). Then add Interdictors based on the new/old destroyers (i.e. Minmatar would get a slow artillery Interdictor with an optimal range bonus, Caldari would get a rail Interdictor, Gallente would get a drone Interdictor and Amarr a gank Interdictor).
I really like your line of thinking. Wanting to give each destroyer a boost and retain some racial flavor has merit. But I would hate to see the catalyst turned into yet another drone boat. And I shudder at the thought of the 8 missle launching cormorant. 
Out of curiosity what constitutes an amarr gank destroyer?
Those ships wouldn't change - new ships would be added instead.
Amarr gank ship = -50% laser cap and +25% laser rof.
TEAM MINMATAR FORUMS
- In Rust We Trust - |
Udyr Vulpayne
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 00:40:00 -
[32]
Edited by: Udyr Vulpayne on 01/08/2006 00:45:02
Originally by: Sarmaul
Give Amarr a gank Destroyer
while i would welcome a new set of destroyers the amarrian one is already able to achieve decent gank potential when using pulses (at least it feels like enough for a ship designed to kill frigs). with beams the damage can be somewhat lacking as you wont be able to fit med beams and dual light beams are not that great with damage but thats not a problem with the ship but with the weapon.
the main problem of the coercer is its inability to keep a target from just warping off when your on your own.
edit: what i was trying to say is basicly that a change in slots for 1 more medslot on the coercer would propably cover all destroyer needs from an amarrian perspective.
more variety is always nice though and i'm sure there are enough expansions ahead to insure that we get a 2nd ship for that class at some point.
|
Webster Carr
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 22:25:00 -
[33]
I don't know about the other posters, but for me destroyers are an interesting class/size of ship that could be expanded a little. The existing ships are good, it would just be interesting to see some variety and more options in the ship class.
Destoyers in the real world ranged from Guided missle destroyers, gun destroyers, surface aircraft destroyers (carried a helicopter), armed transports, landing craft, and electronic warfare and scout destroyers. No need to change the existing craft, it just might be fun to see some more variety in the class.
|
Pattern Clarc
Dark Destiny Inc.
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 22:48:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Sarmaul
Give Amarr a gank Destroyer, Caldari a missile Destroyer (T1 Flycatcher), Gallente a drone Destroyer and Minmatar an AC Destroyer (T1 Sabre). Then add Interdictors based on the new/old destroyers (i.e. Minmatar would get a slow artillery Interdictor with an optimal range bonus, Caldari would get a rail Interdictor, Gallente would get a drone Interdictor and Amarr a gank Interdictor).
Magic.
/signed
Roden Shipyards?
MWD cap penalty? |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |