Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Rabe Raptor
The Conference Elite CODE.
121
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 05:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
According to the EULA, what is real life harassment? Having a hard time finding the definition. Is it out of client simply?
Ingame clearly isn't. Are the forums real life? Ingame voice chat? Teamspeak?
Just curious Together we can make Highsec a better place! www.lawofhighsec.com
Read it, share it, learn it, quote it, memorize it,-á live it, breathe it! |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
9630
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 05:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
Good luck, but they won't tell you. You have to keep guessing where the invisible line is, and it changes based on how hard someone cries. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Clean Up Local 2014.-á |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
5964
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 05:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Oh boy. Here we go.
I know you and all the other idiots about to start these threads feel you are too special to post in the sticky, but you're not.
Really.
Mr Epeen There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |
Glathull
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
665
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 05:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
Do you feel the need to call your local police?
If so, then you should do that.
If not, then it is probably not actual harassment. But, you know, file a petition. I honestly feel like I just read fifty shades of dumb. --CCP Falcon |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
5426
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 05:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Rabe Raptor wrote:According to the EULA, what is real life harassment? Having a hard time finding the definition. Is it out of client simply?
Ingame clearly isn't. Are the forums real life? Ingame voice chat? Your personal teamspeak?
Just curious. If its out of client (teamspeak) for example, are blogs, websites, etc. that say scammers use (like for fake api references) real life harassment now?
CCP judges things on a case by case or petition by petition basis.
As was told to me by a CSM in these very forums (and made me even question how entire nations are run) re the IZ case, if it was clearly and precisely laid out what harassment was, then some players are going to make circumventing and lawyering over it their entire game, complete with "the art of lawfare" and word games. As such when you create a system that attempts to protect people but tries to define every little nook and cranny, dubious people will game it to death. The United States Constitution and how we ended up with law books thicker than the phone book and everybody is a criminal anyway if a cop tailgates them long enough is a good example of how a system can be gamed to death.
So don't go looking for a clear definition. There won't be one.
And that's a good thing. Bring back DEEEEP Space! |
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
11923
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 05:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
Let's use the topic CCP has already created for this discussion. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=372621&find=unread
Stop tolling me. Im jnot drunk...-áIm going to stop posti --Pepper the Penguin ~ And when the seasons change, will you stand by me? ~ |
Glathull
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
665
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 05:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
Whoa, that's a new look Sibyyl. I kinda like it. I honestly feel like I just read fifty shades of dumb. --CCP Falcon |
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
1072
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 05:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Eh, why bother with a petition? You will only get the same bull$.
The name of the game is "Lets vaguely define the rules and then selectively AND retroactively enforce them in order to ban anyone we don't like. Then we cloak everything in secrecy and ban anyone from talking about it." And you know, its their game and their right.
And I'll form my own opinions about their staff based on how they exercise that right.
The sooner you accept that those enforcing the rules are essentially children, the sooner pieces will come together for you.
Do you think it is a coincidence that this occurred right after CCP Gargants' Alliance Tourney petulant tearfest? His post literally needed a Kleenex.
Do you think it is a coincidence that this enforcement occurred only AFTER several months of CODE. sponsored "Burn Jita" levels of high-sec freighter destruction, despite recent buffs?
Still, surprised that CCP GM/DEV staff has fallen this far. This was a pretty good game 5-6 years ago.
I say, double down, pop more freighters, hit CCP where it hurts. Waiting for the winter freeze so I can participate in sending more subscription paying carebears into permanent retirement.
Though really, they can't do more damage to themselves then they already have, throwing away 44M on stupid side projects. I laugh at them.
|
Remiel Pollard
Shock Treatment Ministries
4812
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 05:38:00 -
[9] - Quote
You do yourselves a disservice by breaking rules to try to prove you aren't breaking rules. There is a thread already for this. IB4L. GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥ - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104 |
LUMINOUS SPIRIT
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
515
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 05:38:00 -
[10] - Quote
How does this go again...
Can I haz your stuff?
No thats not it...
HTFU?
Hmm, close but not quite...
Ahh of course!
IB4L! |
|
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
1073
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 05:55:00 -
[11] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:You do yourselves a disservice by breaking rules to try to prove you aren't breaking rules. There is a thread already for this. IB4L.
A disservice? Ha. Thats a good one.
Forum rules, as currently enforced, are a joke.
It more or less boils down to "Hmmm, this thread conforms to the rules.......but we just don't like it. Call it a troll, lock."
Kind of the forum equivalent of what happened to those perma-banned recently, except with higher stakes.
So, OP - good on you. Give em all the respect they've earned - that is, none at all.
Oh, and for the second time, IBTL. |
Remiel Pollard
Shock Treatment Ministries
4813
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 06:01:00 -
[12] - Quote
Herr Wilkus wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:You do yourselves a disservice by breaking rules to try to prove you aren't breaking rules. There is a thread already for this. IB4L. A disservice? Ha. Thats a good one. Forum rules, as currently enforced, are a joke. It more or less boils down to "Hmmm, this thread conforms to the rules.......but we just don't like it. Call it a troll, lock." Kind of the forum equivalent of what happened to those perma-banned recently, except with higher stakes. So, OP - good on you. Give em all the respect they've earned - that is, none at all. Oh, and for the second time, IBTL.
I actually agree with you. But here's the thing, one dude trolling the forums won't make a difference.
In 2011, the players made a difference.
If I don't see the possibility of any difference made, then I've literally got no reason to get behind what is, essentially, a tantrum.
I tried offering the players a way to make a difference the last time this happened, and I won't be taking the lead again. Instead, I'll just keep playing and laughing at the tantrums while I destroy newbs and carebears, completely within the bounds of the rules of the game, and see how many people I can get to quit.
There's literally nothing better to do right now, IMO. GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥ - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104 |
Aiwha
Infinite Point Nulli Secunda
782
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 06:09:00 -
[13] - Quote
Ask a GM. If you don't like their answer, escalate it to a senior GM. If you don't like their answer, play WoW. We're winning the war if it says so on CAOD! -á
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
5428
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 06:11:00 -
[14] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:You do yourselves a disservice by breaking rules to try to prove you aren't breaking rules. There is a thread already for this. IB4L. A disservice? Ha. Thats a good one. Forum rules, as currently enforced, are a joke. It more or less boils down to "Hmmm, this thread conforms to the rules.......but we just don't like it. Call it a troll, lock." Kind of the forum equivalent of what happened to those perma-banned recently, except with higher stakes. So, OP - good on you. Give em all the respect they've earned - that is, none at all. Oh, and for the second time, IBTL. I actually agree with you. But here's the thing, one dude trolling the forums won't make a difference. In 2011, the players made a difference. If I don't see the possibility of any difference made, then I've literally got no reason to get behind what is, essentially, a tantrum. I tried offering the players a way to make a difference the last time this happened, and I won't be taking the lead again. Instead, I'll just keep playing and laughing at the tantrums while I destroy newbs and carebears, completely within the bounds of the rules of the game, and see how many people I can get to quit. There's literally nothing better to do right now, IMO.
What we are looking at ultimately is the different between activism and resistance.
Bring back DEEEEP Space! |
Yarda Black
Militaris Industries Northern Coalition.
422
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 06:19:00 -
[15] - Quote
If you're looking to find the line for yourself; stop playing. Humanity and its society doesn't need you, and this game doesn't either.
If you feel harassed; file a petition. Try to supply logs or as much data as you can. And don't be a baby and leave out the context.
So... goodbye or goodluck |
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
1075
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 06:23:00 -
[16] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I actually agree with you. But here's the thing, one dude trolling the forums won't make a difference.
In 2011, the players made a difference.
If I don't see the possibility of any difference made, then I've literally got no reason to get behind what is, essentially, a tantrum.
I tried offering the players a way to make a difference the last time this happened, and I won't be taking the lead again. Instead, I'll just keep playing and laughing at the tantrums while I destroy newbs and carebears, completely within the bounds of the rules of the game, and see how many people I can get to quit.
There's literally nothing better to do right now, IMO.
Eh, good point.
With my usual seasonal lack of time, my level of 'give a F about EVE' is at a low ebb.
Not even sure why I'm posting instead of sleeping. Habit I suppose.
My distaste for their attitude and conduct has grown to the point where I consider the recent strings of CCP layoff notices to be the best 'Killmails' of all. Sad, really - Eve *was* really special.
When it comes right down to it - there is only one way to impact CCP however - hit their bottom line. Subscriptions. Just make sure you stay on the right side of the 'invisible line'.
Good luck with that.....
|
Chopper Rollins
Lantean Empire
959
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 06:24:00 -
[17] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Herr Wilkus wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:You do yourselves a disservice by breaking rules to try to prove you aren't breaking rules. There is a thread already for this. IB4L. A disservice? Ha. Thats a good one. Forum rules, as currently enforced, are a joke. It more or less boils down to "Hmmm, this thread conforms to the rules.......but we just don't like it. Call it a troll, lock." Kind of the forum equivalent of what happened to those perma-banned recently, except with higher stakes. So, OP - good on you. Give em all the respect they've earned - that is, none at all. Oh, and for the second time, IBTL. I actually agree with you. But here's the thing, one dude trolling the forums won't make a difference. In 2011, the players made a difference. If I don't see the possibility of any difference made, then I've literally got no reason to get behind what is, essentially, a tantrum. I tried offering the players a way to make a difference the last time this happened, and I won't be taking the lead again. Instead, I'll just keep playing and laughing at the tantrums while I destroy newbs and carebears, completely within the bounds of the rules of the game, and see how many people I can get to quit. There's literally nothing better to do right now, IMO. What we are looking at ultimately is the different between activism and resistance.
Not empty quotan. ITT: Customers try to realise themselves by any means other than the only one that's real; leaving.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good. |
Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
4231
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 07:36:00 -
[18] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:CCP judges things on a case by case or petition by petition basis.
As was told to me by a CSM in these very forums (and made me even question how entire nations are run) re the IZ case, if it was clearly and precisely laid out what harassment was, then some players are going to make circumventing and lawyering over it their entire game, complete with "the art of lawfare" and word games. As such when you create a system that attempts to protect people but tries to define every little nook and cranny, dubious people will game it to death. The United States Constitution and how we ended up with law books thicker than the phone book and everybody is a criminal anyway if a cop tailgates them long enough is a good example of how a system can be gamed to death.
So don't go looking for a clear definition. There won't be one.
And that's a good thing. That's quite ********. It was when the initially stated it and it is when it's said now. Will people push boundaries? Of course they will, but the reason rules should be clearly defined is so that people know where the line is so they know what they can and cannot do. When you just say "Don't be bad!" then people have no idea where they stand, so legitimate efforts to not be bad can still end up with you getting instabanned. The thing is, anyone that would game a system with strict rules still games a system with fuzzy rules, so claiming that fuzzy rules is there to protect people is ludicrous, since the only people hurt by it are those who genuinely don't intend to game it.
Funnily enough though, a lot of this came out with the E1 thing. Now if you look at that, that happened on a 3rd party service, yet quite clearly on the ToS it states
Quote:You will report out-of-game issues regarding harassment, such as threatening phone calls or correspondence, to your local law enforcement officials or Internet provider. CCP will not reveal personal information about its subscribers to unauthorized individuals. We are not responsible for actions taken by our subscribers that occur outside the jurisdiction of our game servers or web site. So even when they do have explicitly stated rules, they don't adhere to them anyway. So basically you have to guess where their invisible moving line is. The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|
Dave Stark
6912
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 07:41:00 -
[19] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Good luck, but they won't tell you. You have to keep guessing where the invisible line is, and it changes based on how hard someone cries.
i thought it changed based on # of blog followers? |
Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
6409
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 08:57:00 -
[20] - Quote
Yarda Black wrote:If you're looking to find the line for yourself; stop playing. Humanity and its society doesn't need you, and this game doesn't either.
If you feel harassed; file a petition. Try to supply logs or as much data as you can. And don't be a baby and leave out the context.
So... goodbye or goodluck "Humanity and its society doesn't need you"?
Seems more than a little extreme for posting a forum thread. |
|
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
9641
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 09:01:00 -
[21] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Good luck, but they won't tell you. You have to keep guessing where the invisible line is, and it changes based on how hard someone cries. i thought it changed based on # of blog followers?
Oh no, we took care of that. He shut it down after it became a widespread practice to tell one's victims to send him an evemail asking for reimbursement. I personally sent him about fifty people that first week, I went on a tear that I have yet to equal since. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Clean Up Local 2014.-á |
Ka'Narlist
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
209
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 09:06:00 -
[22] - Quote
Rabe Raptor wrote:According to the EULA, what is real life harassment? If you have to ask you probably doing something you shouldn't do
|
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
5555
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 09:09:00 -
[23] - Quote
Rabe Raptor wrote:According to the EULA, what is real life harassment? Having a hard time finding the definition. Is it out of client simply?
Ingame clearly isn't. Are the forums real life? Ingame voice chat? Your personal teamspeak?
Just curious. If its out of client (teamspeak) for example, are blogs, websites, etc. that say scammers use (like for fake api references) real life harassment now?
This should help clear things up. GM Hormonia's excellent post on the Magic Circle: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1034909#post1034909
If someone is using third party resources to scam you in game, that doesn't cause you real life harm in any way, shape or form. And in a game where third party resources are integral to the experience (they don't call it spreadsheets in space for nothing, sugarplum), they don't actually exit the magic circle in any other way.
If someone is harassing you over TS, through a Blog, website, etc. you should report them to the police or at least their hosting. A petition won't hurt, but CCP is unlikely to be in a position to affirmatively verify the connection between an EVE account and a blog. "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon |
Rabe Raptor
The Conference Elite CODE.
122
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 09:28:00 -
[24] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote: If someone is using third party resources to scam you in game, that doesn't cause you real life harm in any way, shape or form. And in a game where third party resources are integral to the experience (they don't call it spreadsheets in space for nothing, sugarplum), they don't actually exit the magic circle in any other way.
About 8-10 people just got blanket permabanned for scamming people using teamspeak to isk double, etc. So I was just curious.
reason: "real life harassment" Together we can make Highsec a better place! www.lawofhighsec.com
Read it, share it, learn it, quote it, memorize it,-á live it, breathe it! |
WASPY69
Hard Knocks Inc.
316
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 09:31:00 -
[25] - Quote
Not sure from which perspective the OP is implied, but my guess would be, when it reaches a personal level.
It's okay to call someone a dirty carebear and blow up his ship repeatedly for fun in game, but if that carebear in question would then acquire real life information on the ganker and proceed to make threats to him/his family, then local police should be contacted to ensure the safety of you and your family.
I also believe every case has a grey area filled with holes and is subject to opinion, but generally, I would say when the "Harassment" goes from EVE related to not EVE related then it's crossed the line. Also someone going out of their way outside the game to make someone's in-game experience miserable, is just really sad and they should visit a psychiatrist to evaluate their mental well being.
As for cases like Erotica and fake recruiting/fake super sale websites, then no, i don't believe it's against the EULA. But there's already a threadnoughts discussing those topics. And lastly, as for blogs/websites. As stated above, as long as no real life information is being leaked, and the content is just angry sperging, then I say everyone's entitled to their own opinion. |
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
5555
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 09:32:00 -
[26] - Quote
Rabe Raptor wrote:RubyPorto wrote: If someone is using third party resources to scam you in game, that doesn't cause you real life harm in any way, shape or form. And in a game where third party resources are integral to the experience (they don't call it spreadsheets in space for nothing, sugarplum), they don't actually exit the magic circle in any other way. About 8-10 people just got blanket permabanned for scamming people using teamspeak related to isk doubling, etc. reason: "real life harassment"
Assuming this is the incident(s) I'm thinking of, that wasn't all they were doing in those TS sessions.
The scam wasn't the reason they got banned, since ISK doubling is quite legal, it was their method of dressing it up that crossed the line out of the magic circle. "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon |
Miles Parabellum
Fusion Enterprises Ltd Brothers of Tangra
48
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 09:48:00 -
[27] - Quote
Griefer tears because there's a line somewhere they can't cross. No sympathy for you guys who get off on bullying. Yes, Eve is a sandbox, but normal people realize there's a limit. Those who don't get that got banned, and Eve is a better place for it. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
9646
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 09:50:00 -
[28] - Quote
Miles Parabellum wrote:Griefer tears because there's a line somewhere they can't cross. No sympathy for you guys who get off on bullying. Yes, Eve is a sandbox, but normal people realize there's a limit. Those who don't get that got banned, and Eve is a better place for it.
Please tell me how the 3 guys from Caldari Militia fit into that bullshit you just spouted. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Clean Up Local 2014.-á |
Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1627
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 09:54:00 -
[29] - Quote
Rabe Raptor wrote:According to the EULA, what is real life harassment? Having a hard time finding the definition. Is it out of client simply?
Ingame clearly isn't. Are the forums real life? Ingame voice chat? Your personal teamspeak?
Just curious. If its out of client (teamspeak) for example, are blogs, websites, etc. that say scammers use (like for fake api references) real life harassment now?
Usually forums are considered a part of the game, since you are within your character.
But if you call to that person house or send him an email (not eve mail) that crosses the line. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |
Miles Parabellum
Fusion Enterprises Ltd Brothers of Tangra
48
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 09:57:00 -
[30] - Quote
You seem emotionally very invested. Maybe you should go for a breath of fresh air. Personally, I think CCP did some much needed spring cleaning. I'm sure they have their reasons to ban the people they did. I'm also sure the people who end up permanently banned knows why - Or maybe the point is that they don't - Either way they're gone now. Good riddance.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |