| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Hiply Rustic
Aliastra Gallente Federation
135
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 02:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
Gaming God wrote:yes that's true you're absolutely right that's a lot of power but i should have bin able to activate some mods ad least the tank mods then i am even not talking about getting a chance to shoot back :)
No. No you didn't even deserve a chance to turn on your tank.
If you're putting around hisec in that blingfit without bothering to run your tank constantly (and have more of a tank than you had, but that's another story) because you don't realize that you have "Gank Me" painted on both your ass and your forehead, then no...you didn't deserve a chance.
Your effectively untanked 22 billion ISK shiny target got lit up like a christmas tree and ate the alphas from 6 tornados...with predictable results. Ralph King-Griffin wrote: "Eve deliberately excludes the stupid and the weak willied." EvE: Only the stong-willied need apply.
|

Hiply Rustic
Aliastra Gallente Federation
137
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 02:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Hiply Rustic wrote:Gaming God wrote:yes that's true you're absolutely right that's a lot of power but i should have bin able to activate some mods ad least the tank mods then i am even not talking about getting a chance to shoot back :) No. No you didn't even deserve a chance to turn on your tank. If you're putting around hisec in that blingfit without bothering to run your tank constantly (and have more of a tank than you had, but that's another story) because you don't realize that you have "Gank Me" painted on both your ass and your forehead, then no...you didn't deserve a chance. Your effectively untanked 22 billion ISK shiny target got lit up like a christmas tree and ate the alphas from 6 tornados...with predictable results.
also...don't fly what you can't cheerfully afford to lose
also...HTFU
also...note to self...'edit' Rustic, not 'reply' Ralph King-Griffin wrote: "Eve deliberately excludes the stupid and the weak willied." EvE: Only the stong-willied need apply.
|

Hiply Rustic
Aliastra Gallente Federation
139
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 05:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Once you guys execute though, there is no way to stop it. 18 Nados can tear through just about any ship in highsec. "If you bring the right tool for the job, you can get the job done. That's imbalanced." These posts of yours are reaching the point of self-parody. Yawn...the important questions of course is how much it SHOULD cost to get the job done, with the optimal tools. That would determine if a rebalance is warranted.
No.
This is far too simplistic. You throw skill, communication, knowledge, and coordination out the window here and somehow arrive at wallet wars.
You don't decide balance by saying a 25 billion ISK blingboat should only be vulnerable if XX billion worth of gank is brought to the party. Well, you might...but you would be wrong. Ralph King-Griffin wrote: "Eve deliberately excludes the stupid and the weak willied." EvE: Only the stong-willied need apply.
|

Hiply Rustic
Aliastra Gallente Federation
144
|
Posted - 2014.09.14 21:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:malcovas Henderson wrote:
eh??
What you on about?
You STATED incentive to make profit ganking more common. Yet want to remove the potially biggest profit margin mechanic.
Sounds like a nerf scream to me.....
No, I want to remove an unrealistic and unwarranted ability for cheap gank ships to kill large combat ships. That has nothing to do with adjusting the risk/reward for ganking ships with a lot of loot to drop v. with little to no loot to drop
Enough already.
Tell you what; you take the Battleship New Jersey, without her escort fleet. I'll take 20 wooden-hulled PT boats captained by suicidal skippers. You do the cost-benefit analysis and get back to me, but your ship is going to the bottom. Ralph King-Griffin wrote: "Eve deliberately excludes the stupid and the weak willied." EvE: Only the strong-willied need apply.
|
| |
|