| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
Aryndel Vyst
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
781
   |
Posted - 2014.09.29 16:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
Heavypredator Singh wrote:Retar Aveymone wrote:Heavypredator Singh wrote:Yep Im all for not reimbursing anyone for power projection nerfs by buffing income from systems. If they fold the better for everyone.
npc stations as power projection buff - should never happen. agreed, moa would be better off if we removed npc pure blind Yea - we are deployed to lowsec because 5z and x7 are so good to be in.
No you deployed to lowsec because you're a roleplaying PVE alliance trying to masquerade as a nullsec PVP one and when you got put to the test you crumbled like Gen Eve's English skills. |
Aryndel Vyst
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
782
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 16:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Aryndel Vyst wrote:
No you deployed to lowsec because you're a roleplaying PVE alliance trying to masquerade as a nullsec PVP one and when you got put to the test you crumbled like Gen Eve's English skills.
So much Grrrrrrr, do try to stay on topic please. 
Why would I be mad? I think it's hilarious that of the caliber of alliances the CFC has scooped up you guys couldn't even manage for like 2 months on top of us offering free SRP. But hey give us the 411 on what being a "null-sec sov owner" is like from the luxury of your NPC station living experience I suppose. |
Aryndel Vyst
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
784
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 18:09:00 -
[3] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Dave Stark wrote:
AND STILL nothing has encouraged coalitions to downsize.
don't get me wrong, i don't think sov is fine as it is. i think it's boring as hell too and that's why i do fun things instead... however the occupancy sov doesn't really address any of the issues you people are perpetually whining about.
The crux of it is that they don't want to downsize. They want to have the same 2 coalitions, each with almost half of the active combat sov pilots, with both coalitions unwilling to fight each other. At the same time, they want new "content" to materialize out of thin air, in the form of farmable sov-holding non-aligned entities from currently sov-wanting players that don't actually exist.
We've stated numerous times that if the meta didn't incentivize massive coalitions, then we wouldn't be in one. We, being Goonswarm, does what the most efficient route to both make other people angry and make ourselves happy. A massive ****-off coalition right now accomplishes just that. Now it so happens that the majority of the alliances in our coalition gel well for the most part making it an actual coalition of ideas. With that said, I'd argue that if the tables were turned and we were in a coalition with NC. or PL then culturally we'd be just as successful. Nullsec entities that last are the ones that appreciate the space for what it is, which is a sandbox without limits. You have to earn your keep, by putting in the work either on the logistics front, the battle front, or the spreadsheet front. |
Aryndel Vyst
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
784
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 18:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
You would know that if you ever had to work to keep anything in nullsec. |
Aryndel Vyst
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
784
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 23:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Just FYI ISD Ezwal they won't promote you to GM based on a quota for locked threads. That was just an inside joke at CCP. |
| |
|