| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Aart Vero
LlNE ARK
0
   |
Posted - 2014.10.02 03:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
Looking to move into w-space made a new corp with a friend. Do I have to wait for 7 days before I can anchor a POS in w-space? Someone complained about it but others suggested it was a bug. Anyone know for certain? Thanks! |
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
4203
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 05:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
For a new corp, yes. I haven't tested since Oceanus was released though.
It is a "bug" in the sense that corp standing no longer matters anywhere.
If it affects you, file a bug report. |
Elena Thiesant
Sun Micro Systems
1482
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 07:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
From the Crius patch notes: ( http://community.eveonline.com/news/patch-notes/patch-notes-for-crius )
Quote:Newly created corporations now need to wait 7 days before being allowed to anchor Control Towers
So not a bug. |
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
4205
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 18:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
I still claim it is a bug, as it is a delay for the first corp standing update.
Which doesn't matter anymore. |
Elena Thiesant
Sun Micro Systems
1484
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 19:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:I still claim it is a bug, as it is a delay for the first corp standing update. Which doesn't matter anymore. CCP mentioning it in the patch notes means it is a bug they don't want to fix.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4695703 |
|
ISD Athechu
ISD STAR
268
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 19:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:I still claim it is a bug, as it is a delay for the first corp standing update. Which doesn't matter anymore. CCP mentioning it in the patch notes means it is a bug they don't want to fix.
http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/starbase-changes-for-crius/ wrote:Control Towers will no longer require faction standings to be anchored in high-security space. Moreover, Control Towers will now be anchorable in previously restricted solar systems like 0.8 and above.
http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/starbase-changes-for-crius/ wrote:Newly formed corporations will need to wait 7 days before being able to anchor Starbases. This is to inhibit players from immediately moving Starbase assets to another corporation if under a war declaration.
It's not a bug it's there to prevent people from just "POS Hopping" I guess would be the appropriate term. Standings requirement has gone away to anchor towers in empire space so it doesn't play a factor in POS towers. I have discussed this with others and based on the wording that is said in the developers blog this applies everywhere in which case you will need to wait 7 days before putting a tower up in Wormhole Space.
If you have further questions I would suggest filing a support ticket and asking the GM team.
ISD Athechu
Commander
ISD STAR (Support Training and Resources)
EVE New Citizens Q&A Resources |
|
J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds
4599
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 19:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
Sorry Atechu, though your reason might be more technically correct.
Tau's is 10 times funnier 
Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with.
Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |
Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS
IDLE EMPIRE
659
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 23:58:00 -
[8] - Quote
ISD Athechu wrote:It's not a bug it's there to prevent people from just "POS Hopping" I guess would be the appropriate term. Standings requirement has gone away to anchor towers in empire space so it doesn't play a factor in POS towers. I have discussed this with others and based on the wording that is said in the developers blog this applies everywhere in which case you will need to wait 7 days before putting a tower up in Wormhole Space.
If you have further questions I would suggest filing a support ticket and asking the GM team.
which isn't relevant in w-space, or lowsec or 0.0. and really does nothing against having multiple corps ready to go for when you end up on the receiving end of a wardec. IMO the whole take it down then put it back up is a bigger hassle then moving it to a different alt corp.
I'll join the chorus asking CCP, don't take my fancy names away from me!
In the name of the Limos, the Malkuth, and the Arbalest, so help me pod
- Mara Rinn |
|
ISD Athechu
ISD STAR
268
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 14:27:00 -
[9] - Quote
Chainsaw Plankton wrote:
which isn't relevant in w-space, or lowsec or 0.0. and really does nothing against having multiple corps ready to go for when you end up on the receiving end of a wardec. IMO the whole take it down then put it back up is a bigger hassle then moving it to a different alt corp.
It is relevant in w-space/low/null space as it applies to all levels of space not just Hi-Sec. Again this is based on the wording of the developers blog. You are correct this doesn't do anything against having multiple corporations ready to go when you end up on the receiving end of a war dec. In which case it doesn't apply since those corporations are already older then 7 days and you prepared for the eventuality of that happening.
ISD Athechu
Commander
ISD STAR (Support Training and Resources)
EVE New Citizens Q&A Resources |
|
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
4207
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 15:54:00 -
[10] - Quote
Seriously, which seems more likely to you:
A. Dig into old, easily broken, poorly written and documented code.
B. Make an excuse to announce the behavior is intended (and maybe addresses it in a future overhaul).
Sorry, I'm a pessimist, which means I'm never disappointed. |
|
|
Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS
IDLE EMPIRE
661
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 17:26:00 -
[11] - Quote
ISD Athechu wrote:Chainsaw Plankton wrote:
which isn't relevant in w-space, or lowsec or 0.0. and really does nothing against having multiple corps ready to go for when you end up on the receiving end of a wardec. IMO the whole take it down then put it back up is a bigger hassle then moving it to a different alt corp.
It is relevant in w-space/low/null space as it applies to all levels of space not just Hi-Sec. Again this is based on the wording of the developers blog. You are correct this doesn't do anything against having multiple corporations ready to go when you end up on the receiving end of a war dec. In which case it doesn't apply since those corporations are already older then 7 days and you prepared for the eventuality of that happening.
the rule does apply yes, but the apparent reason for said rule is not relevant as you are free to shoot the structure at any time in non-highsec areas.
I'll join the chorus asking CCP, don't take my fancy names away from me!
In the name of the Limos, the Malkuth, and the Arbalest, so help me pod
- Mara Rinn |
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
2865
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 05:31:00 -
[12] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:Seriously, which seems more likely to you:
A. Dig into old, easily broken, poorly written and documented code.
B. Make an excuse to announce the behavior is intended (and maybe addresses it in a future overhaul).
Sorry, I'm a pessimist, which means I'm never disappointed.
as already mentioned it was added to evade wardecs in highsec and make your pos assets 100% invulnerable via corp hopping. Standings are not even needed for anything anymore.
eve style bounties (done)
dust boarding parties
imagine there is war and everybody cloaks - join FW |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |