| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
J A Aloysiusz
Precision Strike Brigade
Easily Excited
58
   |
Posted - 2014.10.03 01:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
Apparently capital projection is a touchy subject. Who knew.
The changes in question:
http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/long-distance-travel-changes-inbound/
The related forum is full of so much flaming and mass posting in general that it's hard to get a solid idea of the "consensus" (or lack thereof).
I'd like to see some quantitative data, so...
TAKE A VOTE:
"Like" the reply that most accurately represents your opinion! |
J A Aloysiusz
Precision Strike Brigade
Easily Excited
58
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 01:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
1) I WILL QUIT EVE
(I like the way things are and I am against the proposed changes)
|
J A Aloysiusz
Precision Strike Brigade
Easily Excited
58
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 01:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
2) ItGÇÖs a good thought butGǪ
(I am for the spirit of the changes, but they are too harsh and/or unbalanced)
|
J A Aloysiusz
Precision Strike Brigade
Easily Excited
58
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 01:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
3) Dem changes be on point!
(I think they accurately address the issues present and provide a strong solution)
|
J A Aloysiusz
Precision Strike Brigade
Easily Excited
58
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 01:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
4) MAKE ALL CAPITALS BURN
(I believe the changes do not go far enough)
|
Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
Reverberation Project
924
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 09:25:00 -
[6] - Quote
5) I have more than one account and am a troll.
\m/ O.o \m/
"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
|
Althalus Stenory
Flying Blacksmiths
42
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 09:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
6) Anything that helps to stop power projection and improve 0.0 is better to the game. (Changes always afraid people). |
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
2828
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 09:50:00 -
[8] - Quote
Shouldn't #6 be "Death to anything with a jump drive"?
I say that it should be. |
El Creepo
Sex Machineguns
Happy Cartel
10
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 09:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
Like my posts because I really want more likes! |
Aakkonen
The 0rigin
Illusion of Solitude
102
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 10:22:00 -
[10] - Quote
Death to all capitals!
Bad Jokes since -09.... Fly Safe! o7 |
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
497
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 12:53:00 -
[11] - Quote
I voted for option 2, primarily because of how CCP appears to have done an end run around the CSM and presented these changes as having strong CSM approval when, in fact, the CSM had barely seen the bulk of the material until a few hours before they were released to us, and certainly not at the CSM Summit.
Overall, I think they're a step in the right direction, and pretty close to on-point. But the whole CSM thing doesn't pass my sniff test.
CCP Falcon's thoughts on suicide ganking.
Reading Comprehension: a skill so important it deserves it's own skillbook.
I want to create content, not become content. |
Ellendras Silver
The Scope
Gallente Federation
150
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 12:56:00 -
[12] - Quote
J A Aloysiusz wrote:1) I WILL QUIT EVE
(I like the way things are and I am against the proposed changes)
can i have your stuff 
Carpe noctem |
J A Aloysiusz
Precision Strike Brigade
Easily Excited
70
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 16:46:00 -
[13] - Quote
Bronson Hughes wrote:I voted for option 2, primarily because of how CCP appears to have done an end run around the CSM and presented these changes as having strong CSM approval when, in fact, the CSM had barely seen the bulk of the material until a few hours before they were released to us, and certainly not at the CSM Summit.
Overall, I think they're a step in the right direction, and pretty close to on-point. But the whole CSM thing doesn't pass my sniff test.
I would personally agree with you here. A bit of shameless self-promotion:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5077328#post5077328 |
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
4780
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 16:52:00 -
[14] - Quote
7) Replace Jump Fatigue with Thargoids.
Sovereignty and Population
New Mining Mechanics |
Ralph King-Griffin
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
5472
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 17:03:00 -
[15] - Quote
8) rablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerable
=]I[= |
Leonard Nimoy II
Dark Force Protectorate
Special Operators Federation Alliance
10
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 17:08:00 -
[16] - Quote
9) It will make null sec more interesting and makes sense for most ships - but JF and BLOPS are being nerfed too hard. |
Komi Toran
Paragon Trust
The Bastion
276
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 17:30:00 -
[17] - Quote
10) I didn't want non-T3 subcaps anyway. |
Arronicus
Bitter Lemons
Brothers of Tangra
1146
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 18:11:00 -
[18] - Quote
Posting in a Ledditor's attempt to get upvotes from all different viewpoints, thread. |
Sigras
Conglomo
919
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 07:02:00 -
[19] - Quote
Taking things like these down to a poll is making two huge assumptions:
1. The common player knows what is best for the game as a whole - Im dubious... This assumption is doubtful at best
2. If the common player knew what was best for the game was in conflict with what was best for him, he would choose what is best for the game - This assumption is known to be false because people are selfish.
TL;DR
It doesnt matter what the players want, what matters is what is best for the game. |
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers
Fidelas Constans
1430
|
Posted - 2014.10.04 07:29:00 -
[20] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:8) rablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerable
Threadzilla |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |