|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
4091
   |
Posted - 2014.10.29 16:26:24 -
[1] - Quote
The meetings. oh god the meetings.
I want a 'I survived the CSM 9 summer summit' tshirt.
Woo! CSM 9!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
4091
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 18:13:38 -
[2] - Quote
Noriko Mai wrote:What's this new dogma thing?
Dogma is the core engine for stats in Eve. How much damage do your guns do? Ask Dogma. How many shield HP do you have? Ask Dogma.
The downside is, the current version of dogma is based on the idea 'take a bunch of attributes from things, and add/multiply them together. return that'. It can't have specific values poked into it.
Brain in a Box is the name of the project to have things like your character skills all precalculated and stored in a central location, so it doesn't have to recalculate things each time you session change. Dogma needs a rewrite to be able to use the values from it.
That's being worked on.
http://youtu.be/diGYlJNpPEo?t=37m15s is part of a fanfest 2014 presentation on it.
Woo! CSM 9!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
4105
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 23:28:55 -
[3] - Quote
Dwissi wrote:Sugar Kyle wrote:Regnag Leppod wrote:
Overall though, CCP needs to decide who they want to own a POS before they make changes to them. You can't expect to create a POS system that people can call "home" then give it tiny amounts of defense, and expect your average small corp to even bother using one. If your vision is that only corps with 100+ people have a POS, fine, but it's going to need to handle the actions/needs of that many players. To say they need to be scalable is fine, but then you lose the "home" idea completely except for the high level ones, which puts us right back at having outposts.
Love the enthusiasm and the ideas, but find your foundation first please.
Yes. This is why some of us have been shaking the bushes and talking to people about POS to compose a document for CCP about how players actually use, see, and view their POS vs what metrics say about them. They are not jumping into the POS changes but looking to turn it into the homes and wanted objects that they should be. Any reason for not 'shaking those bushes ' in the public? Its simply hard to see from our side who gets to deliver input to you guys and who isnt. Doesnt look very representative when it happens without 'us' being able to see the different views and usages that are discussed and risking that some views never get listed.
Actually, we have been asking in public. The discussions with people tend to be in private, due to opsec, but the asking was public.
Woo! CSM 9!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
4107
|
Posted - 2014.10.31 03:11:13 -
[4] - Quote
Regnag Leppod wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:[quote=Dwissi]
Actually, we have been asking in public. The discussions with people tend to be in private, due to opsec, but the asking was public. Is there any one in particular that an evemail can be sent to then with such information? "opsec" is one of those issues that's kept me from being completely open about issues like this.
Pick a CSM member that you think you can trust enough 
Woo! CSM 9!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
|
|
| |
|