EVE Search - Stacking Penalty on Cargo Expansion

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Stacking Penalty on Cargo Expansion - or Making Armor Haulers Work

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 2023	Posted - 2014.12.04 09:34:55 - [31] - Quote Komi Toran wrote: I'm very curious about that fit. Two 800mm plates, two trimarks, three hardeners, a damage control, and reactor don't get me anywhere near that. What modules are you using to make up the 80,000 EHP difference? And then what is it once you throw Slaves on it??? I believe he is overheating the hardeners. With T2 fittings, overheating, and a boosting ship (no implants), I can get the Bustard to 351,811 EHP. But with no fleet boosts, overheating or implants, it's only 178,549 EHP. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) "What if [climate change is] a big hoax and we create a better world for nothing?" -comic on Greenmonk
Komi Toran Paragon Trust The Bastion 419	Posted - 2014.12.04 09:36:30 - [32] - Quote Reaver Glitterstim wrote: I believe he is overheating the hardeners. That still leaves an 80,000 EHP gap, because I'm overheating them as well.
McChicken Combo HalfMayo The Happy Meal 94	Posted - 2014.12.04 10:53:50 - [33] - Quote Komi Toran wrote: McChicken Combo HalfMayo wrote: I've meddled with the fits for both these ships and find the Impel can score a slightly larger tank when both are using a propulsion module. I have an Impel fit at 275,000 EHP with all T2 modules, a T2 Bustard from my experience cannot match that with a prop mod fit. I'm very curious about that fit. Two 800mm plates, two trimarks, three hardeners, a damage control, and reactor don't get me anywhere near that. What modules are you using to make up the 80,000 EHP difference? And then what is it once you throw Slaves on it??? 284,500 EHP and aligns in 10s due to the MWD. 453,000 EHP with a set of Slaves. [Impel, EHP High-Sec T2] [empty high slot] [empty high slot] [empty mid slot] Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I 800mm Reinforced Steel Plates II 2x Armor Thermic Hardener II 2x Armor EM Hardener II Armor Kinetic Hardener II Armor Explosive Hardener II 2x Medium Trimark Armor Pump II 1000x Nanite Repair Paste With an extra 40 million ISK in modules (to save CPU), it looks like this instead, which is capable of the cloak-MWD maneuver. Same EHP numbers. [Impel, EHP High-Sec Cheap] [empty high slot] Improved Cloaking Device II Small Capacitor Booster II (Navy Cap Booster 400) Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I 800mm Reinforced Steel Plates II True Sansha Armor Thermic Hardener Armor Thermic Hardener II 2x True Sansha Armor EM Hardener True Sansha Armor Kinetic Hardener Armor Explosive Hardener II 2x Medium Trimark Armor Pump II 1000x Nanite Repair Paste 20x Navy Cap Booster 400 ~ Bookmarks in overview ~ Fleet improvements
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 2023	Posted - 2014.12.04 12:11:19 - [34] - Quote Komi Toran wrote: Edit: And boosting ship? Hell, let's just throw a group of 10 logi ships in there as well. If you need 2 - 2.5 billion in implants and a booster to compete with the Bustard, the Bustard wins. I was only pointing out that folks weren't being specific enough about what they used or didn't use, and that probably had something to do with the large difference in figures. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) "What if [climate change is] a big hoax and we create a better world for nothing?" -comic on Greenmonk
Komi Toran Paragon Trust The Bastion 420	Posted - 2014.12.04 16:09:08 - [35] - Quote McChicken Combo HalfMayo wrote: 284,500 EHP and aligns in 10 due to the MWD. 453,000 EHP with a set of Slaves. Very nice! Fitting saved. Only change I'd make on the first, since there's no cloak, is an AB for a 7.5 sec align time.
Andrew Indy Four Pillar Production Headshot Gaming 115	Posted - 2014.12.05 02:03:12 - [36] - Quote Reaver Glitterstim wrote: Thank you, finally someone who understands what I'm saying! P.S. I'm the OP. I was thinking that an easier fix would be to just drop the tank on the shield haulers, that way the tank would be the same and everyone can fit bulk heads ect to add to the overall EHP if you want to gain tank. Still not perfect.

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.